Recommendations/● observation· Governance review· Priority: Next cycle

Spot-check agreements where amendment descriptions diverge from origin.

The dataset shows 50 federal agreements where the current-amendment description shares <30% keyword overlap with the original commitment. Drift is sometimes just rewriting (same scope, different vocabulary). Sometimes it indicates material scope change that should have triggered re-procurement. The recommendation is grounded in 50 pattern-detector matches across the federal corpus. Each cited match links back to specific source rows; an auditor walking the citation can verify every dollar in the headline.

Gross at stake
$0
Recoverable / prevented
$0
Indirect annual cost of inaction
$0
Confidence
75%

Monetary impact

Implementation (one-time)
$200K
Net Year-1 impact
$-200K
Recovery rate
—

Recoverable / prevention rate (2.0%) and indirect-cost rate (1.5%) are calibrated category-level defaults grounded in published auditor benchmarks. Implementation cost is a calibrated point estimate based on category complexity. Funders should refine all three with their own historical recovery data.

Risk overview

Likelihood
● low
Impact
● low
Composite
Routine
Regulatory exposure

Charity-sector regulators (CRA Charities Directorate) flag circular flows in compliance reviews; federal funders inherit reputational exposure.

Operational risk

Loops obscure the true cost of delivery and complicate program evaluation against intended outcomes.

Reputational risk

TRACE-attributed methodology is now public and citable; non-action against high-score loops is itself a media risk.

Justification & audit trail

50 cited matches · $0 at stake

The dataset shows 50 federal agreements where the current-amendment description shares <30% keyword overlap with the original commitment. Drift is sometimes just rewriting (same scope, different vocabulary). Sometimes it indicates material scope change that should have triggered re-procurement. The recommendation is grounded in 50 pattern-detector matches across the federal corpus. Each cited match links back to specific source rows; an auditor walking the citation can verify every dollar in the headline.

Key metrics
  • description_similarity
    0.000
    source: fed.grants_contributions
  • description_similarity
    0.000
    source: fed.grants_contributions
  • description_similarity
    0.000
    source: fed.grants_contributions
  • description_similarity
    0.000
    source: fed.grants_contributions
  • description_similarity
    0.000
    source: fed.grants_contributions
Source rows (5 cited)
SourceRowFieldValue
fed.grants_contributions141-2019-2020-Q2-00850description_similarity0.000
fed.grants_contributions141-2019-2020-Q3-00040description_similarity0.000
fed.grants_contributions172-2018-2019-Q3-913541description_similarity0.000
fed.grants_contributions086-2021-2022-Q2-00205description_similarity0.000
fed.grants_contributions064-2018-2019-Q2-00056description_similarity0.000

Confidence rationale. Calibrated from 50 cited matches at observation severity. Confidence increases with match volume and severity; the snapshot pipeline rebuilds nightly.

Timeline & dependencies

Start offset
+180 days
Duration
270 days
Depends on
none
Milestones
  1. D+210Background monitoring established
  2. D+360Mid-cycle review
  3. D+450Decision point

Calibrated next steps

  1. 01Read the original and current descriptions side-by-side for each match.
  2. 02Where scope materially changed, flag for procurement-rule review.
  3. 03Cross-reference with sole-source-creep — drift + value growth is a stronger signal than drift alone.
Spot-check agreements where amendment descriptions diverge f — Glassbox