The dataset shows entities the upstream entity-resolution pipeline adjudicated as RELATED to other funded entities — distinct legal registrations that share a name, structure, or governance lineage — where related-party relationships are more likely to materialise.
Detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
Glassbox surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is a calibrated read on how strongly the dataset matches the pattern definition — a starting point for review, not a verdict.
● Observation
The match meets the pattern threshold but the signal is the lower band. Normal review queue.
● Attention
The match exceeds the routine threshold. Worth a closer look — pull the source rows, walk the citation.
● Flag
The match is in the highest band of the calibrated scale. Recommend: prioritise for active review.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
17,501 matches· page 77
Live table · computed Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:16:17 GMT
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE SALVATION ARMY HALIFAX CENTRE OF HOPE / LE CONSEIL DIRECTEUR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT AU CANADA AU NOM DU CENTRE ESPOIR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT DE HALIFAX
medium
recipient · THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE SALVATION ARMY HALIFAX CENTRE OF HOPE / LE CONSEIL DIRECTEUR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT AU CANADA AU NOM DU CENTRE ESPOIR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT DE HALIFAX
The dataset shows THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE SALVATION ARMY HALIFAX CENTRE OF HOPE / LE CONSEIL DIRECTEUR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT AU CANADA AU NOM DU CENTRE ESPOIR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT DE HALIFAX (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA/ WINNIPEG MULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTRE; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY ON BEHALF OF VANCOUVER HARBOUR LIGHT; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY BARBARA MITCHELL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY CANADA WEST; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA & SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.832
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA/ WINNIPEG MULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTRE (0.85) — Both are Salvation Army Canada governing council entities acting on behalf of different local centres (Halifax Centre of Hope vs. Winnipeg Multicultural Family Centre). Same legal umbrella but different program locations — RELATED, not SAME
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY ON BEHALF OF VANCOUVER HARBOUR LIGHT (0.85) — Both are 'on behalf of' vehicles of The Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada, but represent different local units (Halifax Centre of Hope vs. Vancouver Harbour Light). Same parent legal entity, different operating locations/pro
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY BARBARA MITCHELL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE (0.82) — Both are Salvation Army governing council entities acting on behalf of different local units (Barbara Mitchell Family Resource Centre vs. Halifax Centre of Hope). Same parent structure but distinct operational locations/programs — RELATED,
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY CANADA WEST (0.82) — Both are Governing Council of The Salvation Army legal entities but represent different regional units: Entity A is the Halifax Centre of Hope (Atlantic/federal grant), Entity B is Canada West (Alberta non-profit). Same umbrella org, differ
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA & SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE (0.82) — Both share 'Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada' as legal parent, but represent different local units (Halifax Centre of Hope vs. Community Resource Centre). Same parent org, different operational entities — RELATED not SAME.
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA & SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE
medium
recipient · THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA & SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE
The dataset shows THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA & SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA/ WINNIPEG MULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTRE; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY CANADA WEST; The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, Harbour Light; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE SALVATION ARMY HALIFAX CENTRE OF HOPE / LE CONSEIL DIRECTEUR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT AU CANADA AU NOM DU CENTRE ESPOIR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT DE HALIFAX; THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY ON BEHALF OF VANCOUVER HARBOUR LIGHT; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.826
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA/ WINNIPEG MULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTRE (0.85) — Both share the same legal parent 'The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada' but represent different local program centres (Community Resource Centre vs. Winnipeg Multicultural Family Centre), making them related affiliates, not
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY CANADA WEST (0.82) — Both are legal entities under The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, but A refers to a specific Community Resource Centre (federal grant recipient) while B is the Canada West regional division. Same parent org, different reg
related entity
The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, Harbour Light (0.82) — Both are Salvation Army Canada governing council entities but represent distinct operational units: A is 'Harbour Light' (addiction/shelter ministry) while B is 'Community Resource Centre'. Same parent legal body, different programs/locatio
related entity
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA ON BEHALF OF THE SALVATION ARMY HALIFAX CENTRE OF HOPE / LE CONSEIL DIRECTEUR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT AU CANADA AU NOM DU CENTRE ESPOIR DE L'ARMÉE DU SALUT DE HALIFAX (0.82) — Both share 'Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada' as legal parent, but represent different local units (Halifax Centre of Hope vs. Community Resource Centre). Same parent org, different operational entities — RELATED not SAME.
THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC.|THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC.
medium
recipient · THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC.|THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC.
The dataset shows THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC.|THE HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON MARINA COMMITTEE INC. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — TOWN OF HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON RECREATION COMMITTEE; TOWN OF HEART'S DELIGHT - ISLINGTON; HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE|HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE; HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON HARBOUR AUTHORITY; HEART'S DELIGHT / ISLINGTON RECREATION COMMITTEE; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.744
related entity
TOWN OF HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON RECREATION COMMITTEE (0.82) — Both are community organisations in Heart's Delight-Islington, NL, but serve distinct purposes (Recreation Committee vs. Marina Committee Inc.). No shared BN. Different legal entities affiliated with the same municipality.
related entity
TOWN OF HEART'S DELIGHT - ISLINGTON (0.78) — Entity A is a marina committee (incorporated body managing a marina) in Heart's Delight-Islington; Entity B is the municipality itself. Same geographic area but distinct legal entities: committee vs. town government.
related entity
HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE|HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE (0.75) — Both share 'Heart's Delight-Islington' geographic identity but differ in purpose: A is an 'Enhancement Committee' (community development) vs B is a 'Marina Committee Inc.' (marina-specific, incorporated). Likely related community groups, no
related entity
HEART'S DELIGHT-ISLINGTON HARBOUR AUTHORITY (0.72) — Both share the Heart's Delight-Islington geographic name but differ in legal form: A is a Harbour Authority (BN 860065515, federal body), B is a Marina Committee Inc. (incorporated nonprofit). Likely related orgs managing the same marina/ha
related entity
HEART'S DELIGHT / ISLINGTON RECREATION COMMITTEE (0.65) — Both reference Heart's Delight-Islington in NL but A is a Recreation Committee while B is a Marina Committee Inc. — distinct committees/organizations sharing a geographic name, not the same legal entity.
THE HOLY TRINITY CANADIAN RUSSIAN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF WOKING, ALBERTA
medium
recipient · THE HOLY TRINITY CANADIAN RUSSIAN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF WOKING, ALBERTA
The dataset shows THE HOLY TRINITY CANADIAN RUSSIAN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF WOKING, ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — HOLY TRINITY CANADIAN RUSSIAN ORTHODOX GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH; Holy Trinity Canadian Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church of Edmonton, Alberta; HOLY TRINITY RUSSIAN GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL; HOLY TRINITY RUSSIAN ORTHODOX GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH; RUSSIAN HOLY TRINITY ORTHODOX CHURCH; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.72
related entity
HOLY TRINITY CANADIAN RUSSIAN ORTHODOX GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH (0.72) — Both are Holy Trinity Canadian Russian Orthodox churches but word order differs ('Greek Catholic' vs 'Greek Orthodox') and Entity B specifies Woking, Alberta. Different BN roots and possible doctrinal/location distinction suggest related bu
related entity
Holy Trinity Canadian Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church of Edmonton, Alberta (0.72) — Both are Holy Trinity Orthodox churches in Alberta with high name overlap, but Entity B specifies Woking, AB and adds 'Canadian Russian Greek' denomination detail. No shared BN root; likely related parish or affiliate, not identical legal e
related entity
HOLY TRINITY RUSSIAN GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL (0.72) — Same Orthodox tradition and similar name but Entity A has a CRA BN (national/urban cathedral) while Entity B specifies Woking, Alberta (rural local church). Different legal entities, likely affiliated congregations under same denomination.
related entity
HOLY TRINITY RUSSIAN ORTHODOX GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH (0.72) — Similar Orthodox church names but key differences: Entity A uses 'Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic' (CRA registered, BN 890207772), Entity B specifies 'Canadian Russian Greek Orthodox' located in Woking, Alberta, no BN. Likely affiliated loc
The Hospital for Sick Children - Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect Program
medium
recipient · The Hospital for Sick Children - Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect Program
The dataset shows The Hospital for Sick Children - Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect Program (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — WOMEN'S AUXILIARY OF THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN,; HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN FOUNDATION - BURN UNIT; THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH; HOSPITAL FOR SICK KIDS DONATION; The Hospital for Sick Children; it appears in 2 datasets (cra, fed) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
WOMEN'S AUXILIARY OF THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN, (0.88) — Entity A is the Women's Auxiliary (a separate charitable org with its own BN) supporting SickKids. Entity B is a program/division of The Hospital for Sick Children itself. Same hospital ecosystem but distinct legal entities.
related entity
HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN FOUNDATION - BURN UNIT (0.82) — Both are distinct program-level units under The Hospital for Sick Children umbrella but represent different programs (Burn Unit vs. Child Abuse/Neglect) with no shared BN. Related as affiliates of the same parent hospital, not the same lega
related entity
THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH (0.82) — Both are distinct CRA-registered entities under The Hospital for Sick Children umbrella. Entity A is a research arm; Entity B is a suspected child abuse program. Same parent hospital but different program/legal registrations — RELATED, not
related entity
HOSPITAL FOR SICK KIDS DONATION (0.75) — Both reference Hospital for Sick Children but are distinct CRA entries: A is a general donation fund, B is a specific suspected child abuse program. Likely sub-accounts or programs of the same parent hospital, not the same legal entity.
related entity
The Hospital for Sick Children (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a specific program/unit (Suspected Child Abuse) within SickKids, not a separate legal entity with its own BN. Likely a department or clinic listed separately in CRA donees, making it RELATED rather than SAME.
recipient · THE KIDNEY FOUNDATION CANADA ATLANTIC BRANCH #2
The dataset shows THE KIDNEY FOUNDATION CANADA ATLANTIC BRANCH #2 (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.87) — KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA NORTHERN ALBERTA NWT BRANCH; Kidney Foundation of Canada - SK Branch; ONTARIO BRANCH KIDNEY CANADA; KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA (MANITOBA BRANCH); KIDNEY FOUNDATION ATLANTIC BRANCH - PICTOU; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.866
related entity
KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA NORTHERN ALBERTA NWT BRANCH (0.92) — Both are regional branches of the Kidney Foundation of Canada but serve different regions (Atlantic Branch #2 vs Northern Alberta/NWT). Same national parent, different regional chapters => RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Kidney Foundation of Canada - SK Branch (0.92) — Both are regional branches of the Kidney Foundation of Canada but serve different provinces (SK vs Atlantic). Different branches/chapters of the same national org = RELATED, not SAME. No shared BN root.
related entity
ONTARIO BRANCH KIDNEY CANADA (0.92) — Both are regional branches of The Kidney Foundation of Canada (Atlantic vs Ontario). They share the same national parent but are distinct legal regional chapters, not the same organization.
related entity
KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA (MANITOBA BRANCH) (0.85) — Both are regional branches of the Kidney Foundation of Canada but different branches (Manitoba vs Atlantic). No shared BN root. Regional chapters of same national charity are RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
KIDNEY FOUNDATION ATLANTIC BRANCH - PICTOU (0.72) — Both are Atlantic Branch chapters of Kidney Foundation Canada but appear to be distinct regional chapters (Pictou vs. Branch #2). No shared BN root; different chapter designations suggest separate registrations within same parent org.
THE KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA FOOTHILLS UNIT #54
medium
recipient · THE KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA FOOTHILLS UNIT #54
The dataset shows THE KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA FOOTHILLS UNIT #54 (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.93) — KOREA VETERANS' ASSOCIATION OF CANADA LETHBRIDGE & DISTRICT UNIT #53; KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA; KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, MANITOBA UNIT 17; KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, NATIONAL CAPITAL UNIT 7; KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA UNIT 26 HAMILTON; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.926
related entity
KOREA VETERANS' ASSOCIATION OF CANADA LETHBRIDGE & DISTRICT UNIT #53 (0.95) — Both are local units of the Korea Veterans Association of Canada but are distinct chapters: Unit #54 (Foothills) and Unit #53 (Lethbridge & District). Different unit numbers and different geographic areas confirm separate legal entities und
related entity
KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (0.92) — Entity B is a specific regional chapter (Foothills Unit #54) of the national Korea Veterans Association of Canada (Entity A). Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, MANITOBA UNIT 17 (0.92) — Both are local units of the Korea Veterans Association of Canada but different chapters: Unit 17 (Manitoba) vs Unit #54 (Foothills/Alberta). Same national organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, NATIONAL CAPITAL UNIT 7 (0.92) — Both are local units of the Korea Veterans Association of Canada but different chapters: Unit 7 (National Capital) vs Unit #54 (Foothills/Alberta). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
KOREA VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA UNIT 26 HAMILTON (0.92) — Both are local units of the Korea Veterans Association of Canada but are different chapters: Unit 26 in Hamilton (ON) vs. Foothills Unit #54 in Alberta. Different unit numbers, different cities/provinces => RELATED as affiliates under same
recipient · THE MUSTARD SEED (CALGARY) STREET CHURCH
The dataset shows THE MUSTARD SEED (CALGARY) STREET CHURCH (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.75) — The Mustard Seed Street Church; MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY SUPPORT; MUSTARD SEED (NEW LIFE MISSION); The Mustard Seed Foundation; The Mustard Seed Society; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.746
related entity
The Mustard Seed Street Church (0.85) — Entity A is the Victoria BC Mustard Seed Street Church (BN 119246213); Entity B is the Calgary branch. Same brand/network but different cities and no shared BN root — likely affiliated chapters, not the same legal entity.
related entity
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITY SUPPORT (0.72) — Both share 'Mustard Seed' brand in Calgary context but are distinct legal entities: A is 'Community Support' (CRA charity), B is 'Street Church' (AB non-profit). Likely affiliates under the Mustard Seed umbrella, not the same legal org.
related entity
MUSTARD SEED (NEW LIFE MISSION) (0.72) — Both reference 'Mustard Seed' street ministry in Calgary but differ in legal name: A is 'New Life Mission' CRA charity; B is 'Calgary Street Church' non-profit. Likely affiliated orgs under the same broader Mustard Seed umbrella, not identi
related entity
The Mustard Seed Foundation (0.72) — Entity A is a CRA-registered public foundation (BN 874532518) operating broadly as The Mustard Seed Foundation. Entity B is an Alberta non-profit 'The Mustard Seed (Calgary) Street Church' with no BN—likely the operating church entity vs. t
related entity
The Mustard Seed Society (0.72) — Entity B has no BN and appears to be a distinct legal entity ('Street Church') registered separately in Alberta, while Entity A is the broader Mustard Seed Society (BN 119050102). Likely affiliated but not provably the same legal org.
The dataset shows The Nature Conservancy (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — Nature Conservancy of Canada - Alberta Region; NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA - ONTARIO REGION; Nature Conservancy of Canada - Saskatchewan Region; NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA-MANITOBA; THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA - NS; it appears in 3 datasets (ab, cra, fed) with 8 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.83
related entity
Nature Conservancy of Canada - Alberta Region (0.85) — Entity A appears to be The Nature Conservancy (US-based international org), while Entity B is Nature Conservancy Canada Alberta Region, a distinct Canadian organization. National vs. regional chapter of a related but separate legal entity.
related entity
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA - ONTARIO REGION (0.85) — Entity A is 'Nature Conservancy of Canada - Ontario Region', a Canadian charity's regional chapter. Entity B appears to be 'The Nature Conservancy', a distinct US-based organization. Different legal entities: one is Canadian (NCC), one is A
related entity
Nature Conservancy of Canada - Saskatchewan Region (0.85) — Entity A is the Saskatchewan regional chapter of Nature Conservancy of Canada (a Canadian org). Entity B is 'The Nature Conservancy', a distinct US-based organization. Different legal entities; regional chapter vs. separate national org.
related entity
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA-MANITOBA (0.82) — Entity A is the Manitoba regional chapter of Nature Conservancy of Canada (a Canadian org). Entity B appears to be 'The Nature Conservancy' — a distinct US-based international organization. Different legal entities; regional chapter vs. sep
related entity
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA - NS (0.78) — Entity A is the Nova Scotia regional chapter of Nature Conservancy of Canada (BN 119246540). Entity B appears to be 'The Nature Conservancy' (US-based org) or a different entity with no BN. Different legal entities; regional chapter vs. pos
The dataset shows THE OPTIMIST CLUB OF RED DEER (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — THE OPTIMIST FUTURES CLUB OF RED DEER; THE RED DEER OPTIMIST BOYS WORK FUND; THE RED DEER OPTIMIST D.U.T.I. FUND SOCIETY; OPTI-MRS CLUB OF RED DEER; PIPER CREEK OPTIMIST CLUB OF RED DEER; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.73
related entity
THE OPTIMIST FUTURES CLUB OF RED DEER (0.82) — Both are Optimist clubs in Red Deer but have distinct names: 'Optimist Club of Red Deer' vs 'Optimist Futures Club of Red Deer'. 'Futures' clubs are a distinct Optimist International affiliate for young adults, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE RED DEER OPTIMIST BOYS WORK FUND (0.78) — The Red Deer Optimist Boys Work Fund is likely a fundraising/charitable fund operated by the Optimist Club of Red Deer, making them related (fund vs. club) but distinct legal entities, not the same organisation.
related entity
THE RED DEER OPTIMIST D.U.T.I. FUND SOCIETY (0.78) — The D.U.T.I. Fund Society is a separate legal entity (likely a charitable fund/trust) affiliated with the Optimist Club of Red Deer, not the same org. Fund societies are typically distinct legal vehicles from their parent clubs.
related entity
OPTI-MRS CLUB OF RED DEER (0.65) — Opti-Mrs Club is likely the women's auxiliary/affiliate of the Optimist Club of Red Deer, not the same legal entity. Both are in Red Deer but distinct organizations with different names and no shared BN.
related entity
PIPER CREEK OPTIMIST CLUB OF RED DEER (0.62) — Both are Optimist Club chapters in Red Deer but 'Piper Creek' specifies a distinct geographic sub-area, suggesting a separate chapter rather than the same legal entity. No BNs to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION BRANCH 22 COLEMAN ALTA
medium
recipient · THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION BRANCH 22 COLEMAN ALTA
The dataset shows THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION BRANCH 22 COLEMAN ALTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.90) — POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO; POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6; THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, BRANCH 8, OTTAWA FOUNDATION; THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION; POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #4; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.898
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association but different numbered branches in different cities (Branch #20 Toronto vs Branch 22 Coleman AB). Same national organization, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6 (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants' Association in Canada but different local chapters: Entity A is Edmonton Branch No. 6, Entity B is Branch 22 in Coleman, Alta. Different locations/branch numbers = distinct legal entities, hence R
related entity
THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, BRANCH 8, OTTAWA FOUNDATION (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants' Association in Canada but different chapters: Branch 8 Ottawa (Entity A, CRA registered) vs Branch 22 Coleman Alta (Entity B, Alberta non-profit). Different branches, cities, BN roots — RELATED as
related entity
THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION (0.88) — Entity A is a charitable foundation (CRA registered, BN 896007572) supporting the Polish Combatants Association nationally. Entity B is a local branch (#22, Coleman AB) of the Polish Combatants Association itself — a regional chapter, not t
THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION IN LOVING MEMORY OF
medium
recipient · THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION IN LOVING MEMORY OF
The dataset shows THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION IN LOVING MEMORY OF (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION IN MEMORY OF LUCY PESTRI; Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation; PRINCESS MARGARET FOUNDATION; The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation; THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.74
related entity
PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION IN MEMORY OF LUCY PESTRI (0.82) — Both are tribute/memorial gift listings under Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation but honour different individuals ('In Loving Memory Of' vs 'In Memory Of Lucy Pestri'). Same parent org, different named funds — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a memorial/tribute fund designation ('IN LOVING MEMORY OF') associated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root. Likely a related giving vehicle rather than the same l
related entity
PRINCESS MARGARET FOUNDATION (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a memorial fund or tribute account ('IN LOVING MEMORY OF') associated with Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root; likely a related tribute/gift vehicle rather than the same
related entity
The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a memorial/tribute fund designation ('in loving memory of') within PMCF, not a separate legal entity, but has no BN and only 1 source link. Likely a gift designation rather than a distinct org; RELATED rather than SAM
related entity
THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a tribute/memorial giving designation ('IN LOVING MEMORY OF') appended to the foundation name, not a separate legal entity but also not exactly the same record. No BN on B; likely a CRA gift designation variant. RELAT
recipient · THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD MB ZONE #2
The dataset shows THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD MB ZONE #2 (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD - CANADA; THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD (CANADA); THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD CANADA; THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD INC.; THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD- CHRIST CHAPEL; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.856
related entity
THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD - CANADA (0.88) — Entity B is a regional zone/chapter (MB Zone #2) of the national RCCG Canada body (Entity A). Different BN roots (A has BN 967372567, B has none listed). Regional chapter vs. national org => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD (CANADA) (0.88) — Entity B is a regional zone chapter (MB Zone #2) of the national body Entity A. No shared BN root; regional chapter vs. national umbrella => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD CANADA (0.85) — Entity B is a regional zone/chapter (MB Zone #2) of the national body in Entity A. Different BN roots (A has 867372597, B has none listed). Regional chapter vs. national organisation => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD INC. (0.85) — Entity B is a regional zone/chapter (MB Zone #2) of the national body Entity A. Different BN roots (B has none), indicating a subordinate unit, not the same legal entity. Regional chapter vs. national org => RELATED.
related entity
THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD- CHRIST CHAPEL (0.82) — Both share the 'Redeemed Christian Church of God' brand but are distinct congregations/zones: A is 'Christ Chapel' with a registered BN; B is 'MB Zone #2' with no BN, likely a regional grouping or separate congregation.
The dataset shows THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION #231 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — The Royal Canadian Legion; Royal Canadian Legion - Forest Branch; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.85) — Entity A is the national Royal Canadian Legion organization; Entity B is branch #231, a local chapter. Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME. Different legal entities despite shared name root.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion - Forest Branch (0.82) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered/named chapters: A is Branch 176 (Forest Branch, BN 107932287), B is Branch #231. No shared BN; different branches of the same national organization => RELATED.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB (0.82) — Entity A is the provincial NB command/branch of the Royal Canadian Legion (a CRA charity with BN). Entity B is a specific local branch (#231). Same national organization but different legal levels: provincial body vs. individual numbered br
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is the generic Royal Canadian Legion Branch charity record (BN 890732140) covering multiple branches; Entity B is a specific branch (#231). Branch vs. parent umbrella registration = RELATED, not SAME. No shared BN to confirm identi
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is a generic 'Royal Canadian Legion Branch' with BN 108096512; Entity B is a specific numbered branch (#231) with no BN. Likely different local branches of the same national organization — RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION #564 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — The Royal Canadian Legion; Royal Canadian Legion - Forest Branch; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.85) — Entity A is the national Royal Canadian Legion organization; Entity B is a specific numbered branch (#564). Branch/chapter vs. national body = RELATED, not SAME. No shared BN root confirms separate legal entities.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion - Forest Branch (0.82) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered branches (BR 176/Forest Branch vs #564). No shared BN root. Distinct local chapters of the same national organization = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB (0.82) — Entity A is the Royal Canadian Legion NB provincial command (charity BN 100862816); Entity B is a specific branch #564. Provincial command vs. local branch = RELATED, not SAME. Different legal entities, no shared BN.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is the generic CRA registered umbrella entry for Royal Canadian Legion Branch (BN 890732140) with multiple sub-branches; Entity B is a specific branch #564 with no BN. Likely same national network but different legal units — prefer
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is a generic Royal Canadian Legion Branch entry (BN 108096512) with no branch number; Entity B is a specific numbered branch (#564). Likely related as branch vs. parent/umbrella, but insufficient data to confirm SAME.
The dataset shows THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.77) — THE ROYAL ALBERTA UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE; THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE HAT; Royal United Services Institute of Regina; ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE OF NEW BRUNSWICK; ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE VANCOUVER SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.766
related entity
THE ROYAL ALBERTA UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE (0.82) — Royal Alberta United Services Institute is a provincial/regional chapter of the national Royal United Services Institute. Same brand family but distinct legal entities — one Alberta-specific, one national-level. No shared BN. Prefer RELATED
related entity
THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE HAT (0.82) — Entity B is a local chapter of the Royal United Services Institute based in Medicine Hat, AB. Regional chapter vs. national/federal-level organisation — RELATED, not SAME. Different geographic scope and datasets.
related entity
Royal United Services Institute of Regina (0.75) — Entity A is the Regina chapter of the Royal United Services Institute; Entity B appears to be the national/parent body. Regional chapter vs. national organization => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE OF NEW BRUNSWICK (0.72) — Entity B 'The Royal United Services Institute' has no BN and appears only in fed grants with no geographic qualifier, possibly a national or UK body. Entity A is clearly the NB regional chapter with a CRA BN. Regional chapter vs. national/p
related entity
ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE VANCOUVER SOCIETY (0.72) — Entity A is explicitly the Vancouver Society (a regional chapter), while Entity B appears to be the national/central Royal United Services Institute. Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES MUSEUM & ARCHIVES; 2295 ROYAL CANADIAN ARMY CADETS (THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES); 2296 ROYAL CANADIAN ARMY CADETS (THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES); ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES REGIMENTAL TRUST FUND; The Royal Winnipeg Rifles Foundation; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.824
related entity
THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES MUSEUM & ARCHIVES (0.88) — The Royal Winnipeg Rifles is the regimental association; the Museum & Archives is a distinct legal charity serving a specific function. Both are CRA qualified donees but appear as separate registered entities. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
2295 ROYAL CANADIAN ARMY CADETS (THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES) (0.85) — Entity B is a specific Army Cadet corps (2295) sponsored by/affiliated with The Royal Winnipeg Rifles regiment (Entity A). They are related organisations — a cadet corps and its sponsoring regiment — not the same legal entity.
related entity
2296 ROYAL CANADIAN ARMY CADETS (THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES) (0.85) — Entity B is a numbered Army Cadet corps (2296) sponsored by/named after The Royal Winnipeg Rifles regiment (Entity A). They are affiliated but legally distinct organizations — a cadet corps vs. the regiment itself.
related entity
ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES REGIMENTAL TRUST FUND (0.82) — Entity A is the regimental trust/general fund (BN 119129310, charitable org) while Entity B is the regiment itself with no BN. Different legal entities: one is the fundraising/trust vehicle, the other is the military unit. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
The Royal Winnipeg Rifles Foundation (0.72) — Entity A (BN 803953439) is the Royal Winnipeg Rifles Foundation/Association — a registered charity. Entity B 'THE ROYAL WINNIPEG RIFLES' has no BN and appears to be the regiment itself or a separate qualified donee. Different legal entities
recipient · THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTRE
The dataset shows THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTRE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.69) — The Salvation Army Community & Family Services; THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY & RESIDENTIAL SERVICES; THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES; THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES (CALGARY); SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY CENTRE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 56 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.686
related entity
The Salvation Army Community & Family Services (0.72) — Both are Salvation Army community service units but distinct: A is 'Community & Family Services' with CRA BN 107516180; B is 'Community Services Centre' from Alberta grants only, no BN. Different program names suggest different local corps/
related entity
THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY & RESIDENTIAL SERVICES (0.72) — Both are Salvation Army units in Alberta but serve distinct functions: 'Community Services Centre' vs 'Community & Residential Services'. Different program mandates suggest separate operational units, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES (0.72) — Entity B adds 'CENTRE' suggesting a specific facility vs. Entity A which may be a broader program/division. Different datasets (fed vs. ab), no BN to confirm identity. Likely related Salvation Army units, not proven same legal entity.
related entity
THE SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY SERVICES (CALGARY) (0.65) — Both are Salvation Army community services entities but different names ('Calgary' vs 'Centre'), different datasets (CRA/fed vs AB), no shared BN root. Likely related Salvation Army units but not provably the same legal entity.
related entity
SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY CENTRE (0.62) — Both are Salvation Army community-level units but names differ: 'Community Centre' vs 'Community Services Centre'. No BNs to confirm identity. Different datasets/provinces. Likely distinct local corps/centres; prefer RELATED over SAME per r
THE SOCIETY OF EDMONTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATES
medium
recipient · THE SOCIETY OF EDMONTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATES
The dataset shows THE SOCIETY OF EDMONTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATES (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — EDMONTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA; Edmonton Symphony Society; THE EDMONTON SYMPHONY FOUNDATION; Alberta Symphony Orchestra Society; SYMPHONY 21 ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.78
related entity
EDMONTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA (0.82) — ESO is the main charity (BN 118942030, CRA). 'Society of Edmonton Symphony Orchestra Associates' is a separate non-profit support/associates group — related affiliate, not the same legal entity. Different BN roots, different legal names.
related entity
Edmonton Symphony Society (0.82) — Entity A is the Edmonton Symphony Society (registered charity, BN 118894203). Entity B is a separate associates/support society with no BN. Likely a friends/volunteer affiliate, not the same legal entity. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
THE EDMONTON SYMPHONY FOUNDATION (0.82) — Both are distinct legal entities related to Edmonton Symphony Orchestra: one is a Foundation (fundraising/endowment arm), the other is an Associates Society (membership/support group). Same ecosystem but different legal organisations.
related entity
Alberta Symphony Orchestra Society (0.72) — Both relate to Edmonton-area symphony orchestra activities but are distinct legal entities: Entity A is the Alberta Symphony Orchestra Society (CRA BN registered charity); Entity B is a separate 'Associates' society, likely a support/friend
related entity
SYMPHONY 21 ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Both are Edmonton symphony-related orgs but have different legal names and no shared BN root. 'Symphony 21' and 'Edmonton Symphony Orchestra Associates' are likely affiliated but distinct legal entities. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
recipient · THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (PTBO)
The dataset shows THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (PTBO) (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — SOCIETE DE ST. VINCENT DE PAUL; SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL ALL SAINT; SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY FAMILY; ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF KINGSTON; St. Vincent de Paul Society; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.812
related entity
SOCIETE DE ST. VINCENT DE PAUL (0.82) — Both are St. Vincent de Paul Society chapters but distinct: A is likely a French-named Quebec/regional chapter; B is explicitly Peterborough (Ptbo) Ontario chapter. Same federation, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL ALL SAINT (0.82) — Both are local St. Vincent de Paul chapters: A is Peterborough (PTBO), B is 'All Saints' parish. Same federation, different local chapters/locations. No shared BN. Prefer RELATED over DIFFERENT due to common parent organization.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY FAMILY (0.82) — Both are local chapters of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul but distinct entities: A is the Peterborough council, B is the Holy Family parish conference. Same federation, different legal organisations.
related entity
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF KINGSTON (0.82) — Both are local chapters of St. Vincent de Paul Society but in different cities: Kingston (Entity A, BN 119204154) vs. Peterborough/PTBO (Entity B, no BN). Different geographic chapters = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
St. Vincent de Paul Society (0.78) — Both are St. Vincent de Paul Society entities but Entity B specifies '(PTBO)' indicating Peterborough chapter. No shared BN root. Regional chapter vs. broader entity => RELATED, not SAME.
THE SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-STAR OF THE SEA CONFERENC
medium
recipient · THE SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-STAR OF THE SEA CONFERENC
The dataset shows THE SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL-STAR OF THE SEA CONFERENC (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL - ST BASIL CONFERENCE; SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ST. DOMINICS CONFERENCE; SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL, ST. TERESA'S CONFERENCE INC.; SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL - HOLY NAME OF MARY CONFERENC; SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL ST. MARY STAR OF THE SEA; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL - ST BASIL CONFERENCE (0.85) — Both are local conferences of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul but distinct chapters: St. Basil Conference (BN 890562341, Lethbridge) vs. Star of the Sea Conference (no BN). Different conferences = RELATED affiliates, not SAME entity.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ST. DOMINICS CONFERENCE (0.85) — Both are local conferences of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul but named after different parishes (St. Dominic's vs. Star of the Sea). Same parent federation, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL, ST. TERESA'S CONFERENCE INC. (0.85) — Both are local conferences of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul but different named conferences (St. Teresa's vs. Star of the Sea). Different BN roots (A has 835534587, B has none). Same umbrella org, distinct legal entities.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL - HOLY NAME OF MARY CONFERENC (0.82) — Both are local conferences of the Society of St. Vincent de Paul but different named conferences (Holy Name of Mary vs Star of the Sea). No shared BN root. Same national federation, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
SOCIETY OF ST.VINCENT DE PAUL ST. MARY STAR OF THE SEA (0.62) — Both are St. Vincent de Paul 'Star of the Sea' units but A names a full parish society ('St. Mary Star of the Sea') while B names a conference chapter. Likely related local SVdP units, not the same legal entity. No BN to confirm. Prefer REL
recipient · THE ST. ALBERT CLUB OF COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL
The dataset shows THE ST. ALBERT CLUB OF COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF CALGARY; COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF EDMONTON; COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF FORT MCMURRAY; Cosmopolitan International Club of Red Deer; STURGEON VALLEY COSMOPOLITAN CLUB; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.824
related entity
COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF CALGARY (0.85) — Both are local chapters of Cosmopolitan International but in different cities (St. Albert vs. Calgary). Same parent organization, different local clubs. Rules indicate different cities => usually DIFFERENT/RELATED; as chapters of a common p
related entity
COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF EDMONTON (0.85) — Both are local clubs of Cosmopolitan International but in different cities (Edmonton vs. St. Albert). They are affiliate chapters of the same international organization, not the same legal entity.
related entity
COSMOPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL CLUB OF FORT MCMURRAY (0.85) — Both are local chapters of Cosmopolitan International but in different cities (Fort McMurray vs. St. Albert). Same parent organization, different local clubs. Per rules: different cities => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Cosmopolitan International Club of Red Deer (0.85) — Both are local clubs of Cosmopolitan International but in different cities (Red Deer vs St. Albert). Same franchise/network but distinct legal chapter organisations. Per rules: different cities => RELATED not SAME.
related entity
STURGEON VALLEY COSMOPOLITAN CLUB (0.72) — Both are local Cosmopolitan International clubs in the St. Albert/Sturgeon Valley area and may overlap geographically, but they have distinct legal names suggesting separate club charters. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.844
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the same parent organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Cherry Grove). Same religious body, different chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Five Rivers). These are separate legal entities/chapters under a common umbrella — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Strathcona). Different chapters/branches of the same religious body — RELATED, not SAME legal entities.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the parent organization 'THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN' but are distinct congregations (Boreal Reef vs. Flurbian). Same umbrella/parent body, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the same parent organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Cherry Grove). Same religious body, different chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same overarching religious organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Foundation vs. Cherry Grove). Different chapters/branches = RELATED, not SAME legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same religious organization name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations: Cherry Grove vs Strathcona. These are sibling/affiliate congregations, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same religious organization name 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs Cherry Grove). These are separate legal non-profits under a common umbrella — affiliate/chapter relationship,
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Five Rivers). These are separate legal entities/chapters under a common umbrella — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the same religious organization name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct congregations: 'Foundation Congregation' vs 'Five Rivers Congregation'. These are sibling/affiliate congregations under the same umbrella, no
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs Strathcona). These are separate legal non-profit registrations representing different chapters/affiliates, not the same entity.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same religious organization name 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs Cherry Grove). These are separate legal non-profits under a common umbrella — affiliate/chapter relationship,
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same overarching religious organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Foundation vs. Cherry Grove). Different chapters/branches = RELATED, not SAME legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the same religious organization name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct congregations: 'Foundation Congregation' vs 'Five Rivers Congregation'. These are sibling/affiliate congregations under the same umbrella, no
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct congregations: Foundation Congregation vs. Strathcona Congregation. Likely affiliated local assemblies of the same religious body, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same overarching organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but represent distinct congregations (Boreal Reef vs Foundation), analogous to regional chapters of a common body — prefer RELATED over SAME.
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.844
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Boreal Reef vs Strathcona). Different chapters/branches of the same religious body — RELATED, not SAME legal entities.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same religious organization name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations: Cherry Grove vs Strathcona. These are sibling/affiliate congregations, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Same parent organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs Strathcona). These are separate legal non-profit registrations representing different chapters/affiliates, not the same entity.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but are distinct congregations: Foundation Congregation vs. Strathcona Congregation. Likely affiliated local assemblies of the same religious body, not the same legal entity.
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION)
medium
recipient · THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION)
The dataset shows THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION); "THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION); THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.826
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (BOREAL REEF CONGREGATION) (0.85) — Both share the parent organization 'THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN' but are distinct congregations (Boreal Reef vs. Flurbian). Same umbrella/parent body, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (CHERRY GROVE CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' parent organization name but are distinct local congregations (Flurbian vs Cherry Grove). Likely affiliated religious bodies under a common umbrella, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (FIVE RIVERS CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share parent org 'THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN' but parenthetical suffixes indicate distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs. Flurbian). Consistent with regional chapters of the same religious body — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same temple name but represent distinct congregations: 'Foundation Congregation' vs 'Flurbian Congregation'. Likely affiliated bodies under the same religious organisation, not the same legal entity.
The dataset shows THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA ARCHIVES (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — The United Church of Canada; The United Church of Canada; THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA; United Church of Canada; UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.82
related entity
The United Church of Canada (0.82) — The United Church of Canada Archives is a distinct archival institution affiliated with The United Church of Canada, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root; B is a specialized sub-unit/affiliate, not the parent denomination itself.
related entity
The United Church of Canada (0.82) — The United Church of Canada Archives is a distinct archival institution affiliated with The United Church of Canada but operates as a separate entity with no shared BN. Parent/subsidiary relationship; prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (0.82) — Archives is a distinct operational unit/department of the United Church of Canada, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root. Parent/subsidiary relationship; prefer RELATED per rules when in doubt between SAME and RELATED.
related entity
United Church of Canada (0.82) — The United Church of Canada Archives is a distinct archival institution affiliated with but not the same legal entity as the United Church of Canada. No shared BN root; archives are typically a subsidiary/affiliate unit, not the parent deno
related entity
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (0.82) — The United Church of Canada Archives is a distinct operational unit/department of the United Church of Canada, not the same legal entity. Archives units typically have separate grant recipients status. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION CALGARY CHAPTER LEBANESE CANADIAN SOCIETY
medium
recipient · THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION CALGARY CHAPTER LEBANESE CANADIAN SOCIETY
The dataset shows THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION CALGARY CHAPTER LEBANESE CANADIAN SOCIETY (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — THE EDMONTON CHAPTER OF THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION.; WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION - BRITISH COLUMBIA COUNCIL; THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION SOCIETY OF EDMONTON; CALGARY LEBANESE CANADIAN CULTURAL UNION INSTITUTE; THE LEBANESE CANADIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY OF CALGARY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
THE EDMONTON CHAPTER OF THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION. (0.92) — Both are chapters of the World Lebanese Cultural Union but in different cities (Calgary vs Edmonton). Same parent organization, different regional chapters = RELATED, not SAME legal entities.
related entity
WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION - BRITISH COLUMBIA COUNCIL (0.88) — Both are regional chapters of the World Lebanese Cultural Union but in different provinces (BC vs. Calgary/Alberta). Different BN roots, different geographic scope — classic regional chapter vs. regional chapter: RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE WORLD LEBANESE CULTURAL UNION SOCIETY OF EDMONTON (0.85) — Both are chapters of the World Lebanese Cultural Union but in different cities (Calgary vs Edmonton). Same parent organization, different regional chapters/legal entities. Different cities rule applies.
related entity
CALGARY LEBANESE CANADIAN CULTURAL UNION INSTITUTE (0.72) — Both are Calgary-based Lebanese-Canadian cultural organizations sharing 'Lebanese Canadian' and 'Cultural Union' keywords. Entity B appears to be a local chapter of the World Lebanese Cultural Union; Entity A is a distinct institute. Likely
recipient · THOMPSON, LAURA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP)
The dataset shows THOMPSON, LAURA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — KUNY, PATRICK (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); NAUTA, ALEX (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP); NELSON, JANELLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); SEHGAL, TWINKLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); HUI, JACE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.744
related entity
KUNY, PATRICK (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.75) — Both are grant recipients linked to Pioneer Hi-Bred Production but different legal entities (Company vs LP) and different individual contacts (Kuny/Thompson). Likely same corporate family but distinct legal forms, so RELATED not SAME.
related entity
NAUTA, ALEX (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP) (0.75) — Both records reference the same company 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production LP' but represent different individual grant recipients (Alex Nauta vs. Laura Thompson). They share the same parent org but are distinct recipient records.
related entity
NELSON, JANELLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.75) — Both reference 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but with different legal suffixes (Company vs LP) and different individual names (Nelson, Janelle vs Thompson, Laura). Likely related entities within the same corporate family, not identical legal
related entity
SEHGAL, TWINKLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.75) — Both entities are grant recipients associated with Pioneer Hi-Bred Production (Company vs LP), but represent different named individuals (Sehgal/Twinkle vs Thompson/Laura) and slightly different legal entity forms. Likely same parent org, d
related entity
HUI, JACE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.72) — Both reference 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but A names a 'Company' and B names an 'LP' (limited partnership) — likely related but distinct legal entities. Different individuals listed suggest different grant recipients under same corporate
The dataset shows TIM HORTONS 2211 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.69) — TIM HORTONS SIPS RESTAURANTS LTD.; TIM HORTONS 6646107 CANADA INC.; 1779785 ALBERTA INC TIM HORTONS; TIM HORTONS 1666330 ALBERTA LTD.; TIM HORTONS T.H. CHESTERMERE LTD.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.694
related entity
TIM HORTONS SIPS RESTAURANTS LTD. (0.75) — Entity A is a specific Tim Hortons franchise location (#2211); Entity B is a named legal franchisee company (Sips Restaurants Ltd.). They may operate the same location but are legally distinct: one is a trade name/location, the other is the
related entity
TIM HORTONS 6646107 CANADA INC. (0.72) — Both are Tim Hortons entities in AB but appear distinct: A is a numbered franchise location (store #2211), B is a numbered Canada Inc. legal entity (6646107). Likely franchisee corp vs. store location — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
1779785 ALBERTA INC TIM HORTONS (0.70) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta company operating a Tim Hortons franchise; Entity B appears to be a specific Tim Hortons outlet (store #2211). Likely same franchisee or related but no BN to confirm SAME; prefer RELATED.
related entity
TIM HORTONS 1666330 ALBERTA LTD. (0.65) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd) operating as Tim Hortons; Entity B appears to be a specific Tim Hortons store/franchise (location #2211). Likely related franchisees but no evidence they are the same legal entity
related entity
TIM HORTONS T.H. CHESTERMERE LTD. (0.65) — Both are Tim Hortons-related Alberta entities but differ structurally: A is a named legal corporation (T.H. Chestermere Ltd.), B is a numbered franchise location (2211). Likely different franchisees or a location vs. its operator corp. Insu
The dataset shows TIM HORTONS 3670 1530433 ALBERTA LTD. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.71) — TIM HORTONS; TIM HORTONS E.I.W.M. HOLDINGS LTD.; BEAUMONT TIM HORTONS; TIM HORTONS STETTLER; TIM HORTONS VALLEYVIEW; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.71
related entity
TIM HORTONS (0.85) — Entity B is '1530433 Alberta Ltd.' operating as 'Tim Hortons 3670' — a franchisee corporate entity, legally distinct from Entity A (Tim Hortons corporate, BN 762699726). Same brand, different legal entities.
related entity
TIM HORTONS E.I.W.M. HOLDINGS LTD. (0.75) — Both are distinct Tim Hortons franchise holding entities in Alberta. 'E.I.W.M. Holdings Ltd.' and '1530433 Alberta Ltd.' are separate legal corporations, likely different franchisee holding companies sharing the Tim Hortons brand but not th
related entity
BEAUMONT TIM HORTONS (0.65) — Both are Tim Hortons locations in Alberta but Entity B is a specific numbered company (1530433 Alberta Ltd.) operating store #3670, while Entity A is a general 'Beaumont Tim Hortons' reference. Likely different franchisee legal entities or
related entity
TIM HORTONS STETTLER (0.65) — Both are Tim Hortons franchise entities in Alberta but Entity A is a location-named entity (Stettler) while Entity B is a numbered Alberta company (1530433 Alberta Ltd., store #3670). Likely different franchisees/legal entities; no shared B
related entity
TIM HORTONS VALLEYVIEW (0.65) — Both are Tim Hortons entities in Alberta but A is a location-named entry (Valleyview) while B is a numbered Alberta Ltd franchise operator (#3670, 1530433 Alta Ltd). Likely related franchisees but no evidence they are the same legal entity.
The dataset shows TIM HORTONS COALDALE & TABER (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — 1779785 ALBERTA INC TIM HORTONS; TIM HORTONS 1317518 ALBERTA LTD.; TIM HORTONS 1549326 ALBERTA LTD.; TIM HORTONS TABER 1223847 ALBERTA LTD.; TIM HORTONS 1666330 ALBERTA LTD.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.734
related entity
1779785 ALBERTA INC TIM HORTONS (0.75) — Both are Tim Hortons franchise entities in Alberta but have different legal identities: A is a numbered company (1779785 Alberta Inc), B refers to specific locations (Coaldale & Taber). Likely different franchisees or related but not same l
related entity
TIM HORTONS 1317518 ALBERTA LTD. (0.75) — Both are Tim Hortons franchise entities in Alberta but legally distinct: A is a numbered company (1317518 Alberta Ltd), B is a trade-name for Coaldale & Taber locations. Likely same owner/franchisee but different legal registrations.
related entity
TIM HORTONS 1549326 ALBERTA LTD. (0.75) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta Ltd (1549326) operating a Tim Hortons franchise; Entity B is a trade-name style reference to Tim Hortons locations in Coaldale & Taber. Likely same operator but not confirmed—different legal identifiers, prefe
related entity
TIM HORTONS TABER 1223847 ALBERTA LTD. (0.72) — Entity A is a specific Alberta numbered company (1223847 Alberta Ltd) operating Tim Hortons in Taber. Entity B covers both Coaldale & Taber locations, suggesting a different operator or broader franchise entity. Same franchisee brand but li
related entity
TIM HORTONS 1666330 ALBERTA LTD. (0.70) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd.) operating a Tim Hortons franchise. Entity B appears to be a trade name for Tim Hortons locations in Coaldale & Taber. Likely same franchise owner but cannot confirm without BN or
TORONTO NORTH CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION - HESPERUS VILLAGE (HESPERUS FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY)
medium
recipient · TORONTO NORTH CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION - HESPERUS VILLAGE (HESPERUS FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY)
The dataset shows TORONTO NORTH CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION - HESPERUS VILLAGE (HESPERUS FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.76) — LONDON CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION; TORONTO NORTH CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION; CPA ONTARIO - TORONTO & YORK REGION; HESPERUS FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY OF ONTARIO; Hesperus Fellowship Village; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.76
related entity
LONDON CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION (0.82) — Both are regional CPA Ontario Association chapters (London vs Toronto North/Hesperus Village), sharing parent affiliation but different geographic chapters/locations. Regional chapters are RELATED, not SAME legal entities.
related entity
TORONTO NORTH CPA ONTARIO ASSOCIATION (0.82) — B is a specific project/site (Hesperus Village / Hesperus Fellowship Community) operated under the Toronto North CPA Ontario Association umbrella — a sub-unit or program, not the same legal entity. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
CPA ONTARIO - TORONTO & YORK REGION (0.72) — Both are CPA Ontario regional associations but represent distinct geographic chapters: Toronto & York Region vs Toronto North (Hesperus Village). Same provincial body umbrella but different legal chapter entities.
related entity
HESPERUS FELLOWSHIP COMMUNITY OF ONTARIO (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a program/project name (Hesperus Village) under a CPA Ontario association umbrella, referencing Hesperus Fellowship Community in parentheses. Different legal entity from registered charity A (BN 118956705). Parent/aff
related entity
Hesperus Fellowship Village (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a federal grant recipient label combining 'Toronto North CPA Ontario Association' with 'Hesperus Village' as a project/location, not the same legal entity as the CRA-registered charity BN 861132637. No shared BN; diff
recipient · TOWN OF CARMAN-BOYNE RIVER UKULELE GROUP
The dataset shows TOWN OF CARMAN-BOYNE RIVER UKULELE GROUP (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN MINOR BALL; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN POOL; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN FARMERS MARKET; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.778
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN MINOR BALL (0.82) — Both are CRA qualified donees administered under Town of Carman but represent distinct community programs (Minor Ball vs Boyne River Ukulele Group). Same municipal umbrella, different activities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN POOL (0.82) — Both are CRA qualified donees under 'Town of Carman' umbrella but represent distinct programs/groups (Carman Pool vs Boyne River Ukulele Group). Same municipal parent, different operational units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL (0.75) — Both are CRA qualified donees under the Town of Carman umbrella but represent distinct community organizations (Carman Community Hall vs. Boyne River Ukulele Group). Same municipal parent, different legal entities/programs.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN FARMERS MARKET (0.75) — Both are CRA qualified donees under the Town of Carman umbrella but represent distinct programs/groups (Farmers Market vs. Boyne River Ukulele Group). Same municipal parent, different operational entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS (0.75) — Both are municipal programs/groups under Town of Carman listed as CRA qualified donees, but they are distinct community programs (Wellness Connections vs. Boyne River Ukulele Group), likely separate municipal initiatives sharing the same mu
recipient · TOWN OF CARMAN - MIDLAND NURSERY SCHOOL
The dataset shows TOWN OF CARMAN - MIDLAND NURSERY SCHOOL (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN POOL; Town of Carman; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS; MIDLAND NURSERY SCHOOL; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.782
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN POOL (0.85) — Both are CRA qualified donees under the Town of Carman municipal umbrella but represent distinct facilities/programs (Carman Pool vs. Midland Nursery School). Same parent municipality, different legal registrations and purposes.
related entity
Town of Carman (0.82) — Entity B 'Town of Carman - Midland Nursery School' is a program/facility operated under the Town of Carman, not the same legal entity. Likely a subsidiary/affiliated body of the municipality, not an identical organisation.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL (0.82) — Both are facilities/programs under Town of Carman umbrella but are distinct legal CRA qualified donees: Carman Community Hall vs. Midland Nursery School. Same municipal parent, different organizations. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS (0.82) — Both are CRA qualified donees under 'TOWN OF CARMAN' umbrella but represent distinct programs/organizations (Carman Wellness Connections vs. Midland Nursery School). Same municipal parent, different legal entities.
related entity
MIDLAND NURSERY SCHOOL (0.60) — Entity A names the nursery school as operated by/under the Town of Carman, suggesting a municipal umbrella. Entity B appears as a standalone charity. Likely same program but possibly different legal registrants. Prefer RELATED over SAME giv
The dataset shows TSUUT'INA MENS' SHELTER (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — Tsuut'ina Nation; TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE; Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department; TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH; TSUUT'INA RECREATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.784
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation (0.85) — Tsuut'ina Nation is a First Nation government; Tsuut'ina Mens' Shelter is a separate facility/program operated within or affiliated with the Nation. Same community but distinct legal/operational entities.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE (0.82) — Both are distinct programs/facilities of the Tsuut'ina Nation but serve different purposes (men's shelter vs. daycare). Same Nation affiliation makes them RELATED, not SAME legal entities.
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department (0.75) — Both entities belong to the Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct departments/programs: one is the Education Department (federal grants), the other a Men's Shelter (Alberta grants). Same nation, different organizational units.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH (0.75) — Both are Tsuut'ina Nation entities but serve distinct functions: a men's shelter vs. a health department. Likely affiliated under Tsuut'ina Nation governance but are separate organizational units, not the same legal entity.
related entity
TSUUT'INA RECREATION (0.75) — Both entities are associated with the Tsuut'ina Nation but serve distinct purposes: one is a recreation body (CRA charity), the other a men's shelter (AB grants). Same community, different organizations. RELATED as affiliates of Tsuut'ina N
The dataset shows TSUUT'INA NATION CONSULTATION (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department; Tsuut'ina Nation; TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE; TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH; TSUUT'INA RECREATION; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.812
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department (0.85) — Both belong to Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct departments/units: one is the Consultation office, the other the Education Department. Same parent nation, different functional entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation (0.82) — Entity B 'Tsuut'ina Nation Consultation' appears to be a specific consultation department/function of Tsuut'ina Nation (Entity A), not the same legal entity. Single source link, no BN, 'Consultation' suffix implies a sub-unit or program.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE (0.82) — Both belong to Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct departments/programs: one is a Consultation office (fed grants), the other a Daycare (AB grants). Same parent nation, different functional units => RELATED.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH (0.82) — Both are departments/divisions of Tsuut'ina Nation but serve distinct functions: Consultation vs Health. Same First Nation umbrella, different operational units. RELATED as affiliate departments, not the same legal entity.
related entity
TSUUT'INA RECREATION (0.75) — Both relate to Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct departments/programs: 'Recreation' is a CRA-registered charity for recreational services; 'Nation Consultation' is a fed grants recipient for consultation activities. Same nation, different f
The dataset shows Tsuut'ina Nation Culture Museum (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — Tsuut'ina Nation; TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE; Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department; TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH; TSUU T'INA MUSEUM ASSOCIATION; it appears in 2 datasets (ab, fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.806
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation (0.85) — Tsuut'ina Nation Culture Museum is a specific cultural institution operated by/under Tsuut'ina Nation, not the nation itself. One is the governing body, the other a subsidiary department/facility. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION DAYCARE (0.82) — Both entities belong to Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct operational units: one is a Culture Museum, the other a Daycare. Same parent nation, different programs/departments. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Tsuut'ina Nation Education Department (0.82) — Both are departments/units of Tsuut'ina Nation but serve distinct functions: Culture Museum vs. Education Department. Same parent nation, different operational entities. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
TSUUT'INA NATION HEALTH (0.82) — Both belong to Tsuut'ina Nation but are distinct departments: A is the Culture Museum, B is the Health department. Same parent nation, different functional units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TSUU T'INA MUSEUM ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Both relate to Tsuut'ina Nation's cultural/museum activities but differ in name structure: A is 'Museum Association' (non-profit/association), B is 'Nation Culture Museum' (government entity). Likely related but distinct legal bodies.
The dataset shows TSUU T'INA NATION - FOOD BANK (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.77) — TSUU T'INA HEALTHY LIVING; TSUU T'INA NATION BAND €“ STONEY CORRECTIONS SOCIETY; TSUU T'INA NA HI NA A'NA FOUNDATION; TSUU T'INA NATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; TSUU T'INA NATION FNDF; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.768
related entity
TSUU T'INA HEALTHY LIVING (0.82) — Both are Tsuu T'ina Nation entities but serve distinct purposes: 'Healthy Living' vs 'Food Bank'. No shared BN, different program mandates. Likely affiliated under the same First Nation but are separate legal/charitable registrations.
related entity
TSUU T'INA NATION BAND €“ STONEY CORRECTIONS SOCIETY (0.82) — Both entities are associated with Tsuu T'ina Nation but serve distinct functions: A is a Food Bank charity (CRA), B is Stoney Corrections Society (AB business). Same Nation, different legal organizations. RELATED.
related entity
TSUU T'INA NA HI NA A'NA FOUNDATION (0.75) — Both entities are associated with the Tsuu T'ina Nation but are distinct organizations: A is a food bank (CRA charity), B is a foundation (AB non-profit). Different names, types, and datasets. Likely affiliated under same Nation but not the
related entity
TSUU T'INA NATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (0.75) — Both entities belong to Tsuu T'ina Nation but serve distinct purposes: A is a food bank (CRA charity) and B is a community association (AB non-profit). Same nation, different legal organisations. RELATED as affiliates under the same First N
related entity
TSUU T'INA NATION FNDF (0.70) — Both relate to Tsuu T'ina Nation but serve distinct functions: A is a CRA-registered food bank charity; B is 'FNDF' (First Nations Development Fund) receiving AB grants. Same nation, different legal entities/programs.
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CLIN D'OEIL (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - FILLES CLIN D'OEIL; PUBLICATIONS TVA II INC. - CLIN D'OEIL SHOPPING (LES); TVA Publications Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 18 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.786
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine brands (Canadian Living vs. Clin d'Oeil). Same parent company, different publication units — RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.82) — Entity A is 'Publications Groupe TVA-Hearst Inc.' (a joint venture/subsidiary), Entity B is 'TVA Publications Inc.' operating the Clin d'Oeil brand. Both are TVA publishing affiliates but distinct legal entities with different names and no
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - FILLES CLIN D'OEIL (0.82) — Both are divisions/publications of TVA Publications Inc., but 'Clin d'Oeil' and 'Filles Clin d'Oeil' are distinct magazine titles/brands. Same parent company, different publication units — RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS TVA II INC. - CLIN D'OEIL SHOPPING (LES) (0.72) — Both involve 'Clin d'Oeil' magazine brand but legal entities differ: 'Publications TVA II Inc.' vs 'TVA Publications Inc.' — likely related corporate entities (same TVA media group) but distinct legal names suggest different subsidiaries/af
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.72) — Entity B appears to be TVA Publications Inc. operating under or funding specifically its 'Clin d'Oeil' magazine/division. The dash notation suggests a subdivision or program, not a separate legal entity, but rules prefer RELATED over SAME w
recipient · TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - DÉCORATION CHEZ-SOI
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - DÉCORATION CHEZ-SOI (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); TVA Publications Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both share parent 'TVA Publications Inc.' but represent distinct magazine titles (Canadian Gardening vs. Décoration Chez-Soi). Same legal parent, different publication/grant recipients — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are TVA Publications Inc. branded publications (Canadian Living and Décoration Chez-Soi), same parent company but distinct magazine titles/divisions listed separately in fed grants. Parent/affiliate relationship, not same legal entity
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS (0.82) — Both are TVA Publications Inc. magazine titles (Côté Jardins and Décoration Chez-Soi), same parent legal entity but listed as distinct grant recipients representing different publication brands, not the same legal record.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.75) — Entity A is 'Publications Groupe TVA-Hearst Inc.' (a joint venture/subsidiary), Entity B is 'TVA Publications Inc.' operating a specific magazine. Related corporate entities under TVA group, but distinct legal organizations.
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.72) — Entity B appears to be TVA Publications Inc. operating under or funding a specific magazine/brand 'Décoration Chez-Soi', suggesting a division/publication of the parent company rather than the same legal entity.
recipient · TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - DERNIÈRE HEURE
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - DERNIÈRE HEURE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); TVA Publications Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 18 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.804
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both are publication divisions of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine brands (Canadian Gardening vs. Dernière Heure). Same parent legal entity, different operating units/titles. RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are divisions/imprints of TVA Publications Inc. but represent different magazine brands (Canadian Living vs. Dernière Heure). Same parent legal entity, different operating units. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS (0.82) — Both are divisions/publications of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine titles (Côté Jardins vs Dernière Heure). Same parent company, different publication units — RELATED rather than SAME legal entity.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.75) — Entity A is a joint venture (Groupe TVA + Hearst), Entity B is TVA Publications Inc. operating 'Dernière Heure' magazine. Both are TVA publishing affiliates but distinct legal entities with different names and structures.
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.75) — Entity B 'TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - DERNIÈRE HEURE' appears to be a specific publication/division (Dernière Heure magazine) of TVA Publications Inc., not a separate legal entity but a branded sub-unit. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
recipient · TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - ESPACE PARENTS.CA
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - ESPACE PARENTS.CA (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); TVA Publications Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.792
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.82) — Both are divisions/publications of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct publication brands (Canadian Gardening vs. Espace Parents.ca). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.82) — Both are TVA Publications Inc. divisions/brands (Canadian Living and EspaceParents.ca), so same parent legal entity but recorded as distinct publication brands in fed grants. Prefer RELATED over SAME as they represent different publication
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS (0.82) — Both are TVA Publications Inc. divisions/publications (Côté Jardins and EspaceParents.ca), same parent legal entity but listed as distinct grant recipients representing different editorial brands/projects.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.75) — Entity A is 'Publications Groupe TVA-Hearst Inc.' (joint venture/subsidiary), Entity B is 'TVA Publications Inc.' operating 'EspaceParents.ca'. Both are TVA publishing affiliates but distinct legal entities with different names and structur
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.75) — Entity B appears to be TVA Publications Inc. operating a specific web property/brand (EspaceParents.ca), suggesting a trade name or project rather than a fully separate legal entity, but also not clearly 'DBA' phrasing. Prefer RELATED per r
recipient · TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - LES IDÉES DE MA MAISON
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - LES IDÉES DE MA MAISON (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); TVA Publications Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 18 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.81
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both are publication brands under TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine titles (Canadian Gardening vs. Les Idées de Ma Maison). Same parent company, different editorial/grant recipients — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both share parent legal entity TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine brands/divisions (Canadian Living vs. Les Idées de ma Maison). Same parent company, different publication trade names — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct magazine titles (Côté Jardins vs. Les Idées de Ma Maison). Same parent company, different editorial products — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.75) — Entity A is a joint venture (TVA-Hearst) publisher; Entity B is TVA Publications Inc. operating a specific magazine brand. Both are in the TVA publishing family but appear to be distinct legal entities with different corporate structures.
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.75) — Entity B 'TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - LES IDÉES DE MA MAISON' appears to be TVA Publications Inc. operating a specific publication/brand (Les Idées de Ma Maison), suggesting a division or trade name rather than a fully identical legal entity. P
recipient · TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - RÉNOVATION BRICOLAGE
The dataset shows TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - RÉNOVATION BRICOLAGE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING; TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS; TVA Publications Inc; PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 9 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both are magazine titles published under TVA Publications Inc., same parent legal entity but different publication brands (Canadian Gardening vs. Rénovation Bricolage). Same parent company, different operating divisions/titles => RELATED.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are divisions/magazines of TVA Publications Inc. but represent distinct publication brands (Canadian Living vs. Rénovation Bricolage). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TVA PUBLICATIONS INC. - CÔTÉ JARDINS (0.82) — Both are TVA Publications Inc. divisions/titles (Côté Jardins and Rénovation Bricolage are distinct magazine brands). Same parent company but different publication units, not the same legal entity record.
related entity
TVA Publications Inc (0.75) — Entity B appears to be TVA Publications Inc. operating under or funding a specific publication/brand 'Rénovation Bricolage', not a pure DBA/O/A synonym but a program-level distinction. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS GROUPE TVA-HEARST INC. (LES) (0.72) — Entity A is a joint venture 'Groupe TVA-Hearst Inc.' (publisher), Entity B is 'TVA Publications Inc.' operating 'Rénovation Bricolage' magazine — related TVA publishing entities but distinct legal companies with different corporate structur
recipient · Ultra Electronics Maritime Systems Inc
The dataset shows Ultra Electronics Maritime Systems Inc (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.; ULTRA ELECTRONICS TCS, INC.|ULTRA ELECTRONICS TCS, INC.; ULTRA ELECTRONICS CANADA DEFENCE INC.; ATTWOOD, NOAH (ULTRA ELECTRONICS MARITIME SYSTEMS); MACDONALD, SHAMUS (ULTRA ELECTRONICS MARITIME SYSTEMS); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 10 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC. (0.92) — Both are distinct Canadian subsidiaries of UK-based Ultra Electronics group: Forensic Technology and Maritime Systems are separate legal entities with different business lines, sharing only the Ultra Electronics parent brand.
related entity
ULTRA ELECTRONICS TCS, INC.|ULTRA ELECTRONICS TCS, INC. (0.88) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Ultra Electronics group. TCS Inc. (BN 838964401) and Maritime Systems Inc. (no BN) share the Ultra Electronics brand but are separate subsidiaries with different names, BNs, and operational focuses
related entity
ULTRA ELECTRONICS CANADA DEFENCE INC. (0.82) — Both are Ultra Electronics subsidiaries but with distinct legal names: 'Canada Defence Inc' vs 'Maritime Systems Inc'. Different legal entities under the same UK parent (Ultra Electronics). Parent/subsidiary or sibling affiliates, not the s
related entity
ATTWOOD, NOAH (ULTRA ELECTRONICS MARITIME SYSTEMS) (0.75) — Entity A appears to be an individual (Noah Attwood) affiliated with Ultra Electronics Maritime Systems, not the company itself. The parenthetical format suggests a person+employer pairing, not a legal entity name. RELATED: individual associ
related entity
MACDONALD, SHAMUS (ULTRA ELECTRONICS MARITIME SYSTEMS) (0.72) — Entity A appears to be an individual (Shamus MacDonald) affiliated with Ultra Electronics Maritime Systems, not the company itself. The parenthetical indicates employer/affiliation, not a trade name or bilingual variant. A is a person, B is
The dataset shows UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - AFGHANISTAN (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — The United Church of Canada; The United Church of Canada; THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA; United Church of Canada; UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.82
related entity
The United Church of Canada (0.82) — Entity B 'United Church of Canada - Afghanistan' appears to be a specific program/appeal fund of the United Church of Canada, not a separate legal entity. No BN root for B; name suggests a designated fund. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules
related entity
The United Church of Canada (0.82) — Entity B appears to be a geographic program/mission arm (Afghanistan) of the national United Church of Canada, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root; likely a related operational unit or project, not the same registrant.
related entity
THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (0.82) — Entity A is 'United Church of Canada - Afghanistan', a specific program/mission arm, while B is the national legal entity. No shared BN. Afghanistan suffix indicates a distinct operational unit/project, not the same legal org. Prefer RELATE
related entity
United Church of Canada (0.82) — Entity B 'United Church of Canada - Afghanistan' appears to be a designated gift fund or project of the United Church of Canada, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root; B has no BN. Likely a sub-fund/program, so RELATED not SAME.
related entity
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA (0.82) — Entity A is a CRA qualified donee specifically for Afghanistan operations; Entity B is the national United Church of Canada org with BN 872937693. Afghanistan branch is a subsidiary/affiliate of the national body, not the same legal entity.
recipient · United Church of Canada - Ukraine Crisis Fund
The dataset shows United Church of Canada - Ukraine Crisis Fund (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — United Church of Canada - Ukraine Appeal; United Church of Canada - Ukraine Relief; United Church of Canada - Ukraine Relief; UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - UKRAINE SUPPORT; UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA , PHILANTHROPY UNITE-UKRAINE; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.7
related entity
United Church of Canada - Ukraine Appeal (0.72) — Both are United Church of Canada fundraising appeals but differ: A is 'Ukraine Appeal' (BN 198192435), B is 'Ukraine Crisis' with no BN. Different campaign names and no shared BN root; likely separate qualified donee registrations for disti
related entity
United Church of Canada - Ukraine Relief (0.72) — Both are United Church of Canada Ukraine-related charities but have different program names (Relief vs Crisis) and Entity B has no BN root. Likely separate CRA-registered funds/appeals under the same parent church, not the same legal entity
related entity
United Church of Canada - Ukraine Relief (0.72) — Both are United Church of Canada relief initiatives but one targets 'Ukraine Relief' (BN 108107435) and the other 'Ukraine Crisis' with no BN. Different program names and no shared BN root; likely separate fundraising designations, not the
related entity
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - UKRAINE SUPPORT (0.72) — Both are United Church of Canada Ukraine-related funds but have different names (Support vs Crisis/Emergency Response), Entity A has a BN root while B has none, suggesting distinct fundraising accounts or campaigns under the same parent org
related entity
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA , PHILANTHROPY UNITE-UKRAINE (0.62) — Both involve United Church of Canada and Ukraine relief, but names differ: 'Ukraine Crisis' vs 'Philanthropy Unite-Ukraine' suggest distinct fundraising streams or campaigns, not clearly the same legal entity or account. No BN to confirm. P
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY ON BEHALF OF VANCOUVER HARBOUR LIGHT (0.82) — Both are legal vehicles of The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada but represent distinct operating units (Community Resource Centre vs. Vancouver Harbour Light). Same parent legal entity, different program/location — RELATED
dataset sources
fed
source link count
2
entity type
organization
confidence
0.7
related entity
RUSSIAN HOLY TRINITY ORTHODOX CHURCH (0.72) — Both are Russian/Greek Orthodox churches with 'Holy Trinity' in the name, but Entity B specifies Woking, Alberta and adds 'Canadian Greek' to the name. No shared BN root. Likely related congregations, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #4 (0.85) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association but different numbered branches (#4 vs #22 Coleman Alta), indicating separate local chapters of the same national organization. Different branches = RELATED, not SAME.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
"THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN" (FOUNDATION CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same overarching organization 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' but represent distinct congregations (Boreal Reef vs Foundation), analogous to regional chapters of a common body — prefer RELATED over SAME.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the 'Temple of God's Gift to Man' parent organization name but are distinct local congregations (Flurbian vs Cherry Grove). Likely affiliated religious bodies under a common umbrella, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share parent org 'THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN' but parenthetical suffixes indicate distinct local congregations (Five Rivers vs. Flurbian). Consistent with regional chapters of the same religious body — RELATED, not SAME.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the same temple name but represent distinct congregations: 'Foundation Congregation' vs 'Flurbian Congregation'. Likely affiliated bodies under the same religious organisation, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (THE FLURBIAN CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the parent name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but differ by congregation: 'Flurbian' vs 'Strathcona'. These are distinct local congregations of the same religious organization — related affiliates, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE TEMPLE OF GOD'S GIFT TO MAN (STRATHCONA CONGREGATION) (0.82) — Both share the parent name 'The Temple of God's Gift to Man' but differ by congregation: 'Flurbian' vs 'Strathcona'. These are distinct local congregations of the same religious organization — related affiliates, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE LEBANESE CANADIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY OF CALGARY (0.72) — Entity B appears to be the Calgary chapter of the World Lebanese Cultural Union (WLCU), a global federation, while Entity A is an independent Lebanese-Canadian cultural society in Calgary. Both serve Calgary's Lebanese community but are dis
