The dataset shows entities the upstream entity-resolution pipeline adjudicated as RELATED to other funded entities — distinct legal registrations that share a name, structure, or governance lineage — where related-party relationships are more likely to materialise.
Detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
Glassbox surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is a calibrated read on how strongly the dataset matches the pattern definition — a starting point for review, not a verdict.
● Observation
The match meets the pattern threshold but the signal is the lower band. Normal review queue.
● Attention
The match exceeds the routine threshold. Worth a closer look — pull the source rows, walk the citation.
● Flag
The match is in the highest band of the calibrated scale. Recommend: prioritise for active review.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
17,501 matches· page 73
Live table · computed Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:16:17 GMT
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE, FILIALE 204
medium
recipient · LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE, FILIALE 204
The dataset shows LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE, FILIALE 204 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE VAL-D'OR FILIALE 076; LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 41, (DANVILLE-WINDSOR); LÉGION CANADIENNE; Légion royale canadienne succ. 44, Shawinigan; LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE BEAUHARNOIS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.858
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE VAL-D'OR FILIALE 076 (0.92) — Both are local branches of the Royal Canadian Legion but different branches: filiale 076 (Val-d'Or) vs. filiale 204. Different branch numbers = different legal chapters. RELATED as affiliates under the same national organization.
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 41, (DANVILLE-WINDSOR) (0.92) — Both are branches of the Royal Canadian Legion but different numbered branches (204 vs. 41 Danville-Windsor). Same national organization, different local chapters/affiliates — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
LÉGION CANADIENNE (0.85) — Entity A is the national Royal Canadian Legion (CRA qualified donee), Entity B is a specific local branch/filiale (204). National org vs. regional chapter = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Légion royale canadienne succ. 44, Shawinigan (0.85) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered affiliates: Entity A is Branch 44 (Shawinigan, CRA BN confirmed), Entity B is Branch 204 (no BN). Different branches = RELATED affiliates under the same national organisation.
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE BEAUHARNOIS (0.75) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches in or near Beauharnois, QC, but Entity B specifies 'Filiale 204' (Branch 204) while Entity A uses the city name. Likely the same local branch named two ways, but without BN or explicit match, prefer R
The dataset shows Légion Royale Canadienne, Filiale 61 (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE FILIALE 34 ARRAS CHAMBLY QUÉBEC; LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 172, BAY CHALEUR; LÉGION CANADIENNE; LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 41, (DANVILLE-WINDSOR); LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE BEAUHARNOIS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.852
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE FILIALE 34 ARRAS CHAMBLY QUÉBEC (0.92) — Both are branches (filiales) of the Royal Canadian Legion but different numbered branches: Filiale 061 vs Filiale 34 Arras (Chambly, QC). Same parent organization, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 172, BAY CHALEUR (0.92) — Both are local branches of the Royal Canadian Legion (French: Légion Royale Canadienne) but different numbered branches: Branch 61 vs. Branch 172 (Bay Chaleur). Same national organization, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
LÉGION CANADIENNE (0.85) — Entity A is the national Canadian Legion (CRA qualified donee), Entity B is a specific local branch (Filiale 061). National organization vs. regional chapter => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE SUCC. 41, (DANVILLE-WINDSOR) (0.85) — Both are local branches (filiales/succursales) of the Royal Canadian Legion but with different branch numbers (61 vs 41) and different locations. Same parent organization, different local chapters.
related entity
LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE DE BEAUHARNOIS (0.72) — Entity A is 'Légion Royale Canadienne de Beauharnois' (named by city), Entity B is 'Filiale 61' (branch number). They may be the same local branch, but naming conventions differ—one uses city, other uses branch number. No BN to confirm. Pre
LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIAN REGIONAL COUNCIL (LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE)
medium
recipient · LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIAN REGIONAL COUNCIL (LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE)
The dataset shows LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIAN REGIONAL COUNCIL (LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE) (business) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE; LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIAN REGIONAL COUNCIL; LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIGENOUS SOCIETY; LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION; LESSER SLAVE LAKE REGIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.78
related entity
LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE (0.82) — Lakeshore Regional Police Service is a policing unit operated under the Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council. Entity B names the parent council with the police service in parentheses; they are distinct legal entities — parent/subsidiar
related entity
LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIAN REGIONAL COUNCIL (0.82) — Entity B is a specific operational unit (Lakeshore Regional Police Service) administered under Entity A (Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council), not the same legal entity. No shared BN. Treat as parent/subsidiary relationship.
related entity
LESSER SLAVE LAKE INDIGENOUS SOCIETY (0.82) — Both are Lesser Slave Lake Indigenous/Indian organizations but serve distinct roles: A is a general indigenous society (non-profit), B is the Indian Regional Council operating a police service. Different legal entities sharing geographic/co
related entity
LAKESHORE REGIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Entity A is a police association (union/employee group); Entity B is the Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council operating the Lakeshore Regional Police Service. Related as the association likely represents members of that police service,
related entity
LESSER SLAVE LAKE REGIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Entity A is a police association (employee/union body) for the Lesser Slave Lake Regional Police. Entity B is the Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council operating the Lakeshore Regional Police Service — the governing body. Same geographi
The dataset shows LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — 1950 - 1956 LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY; 1957-61 LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY; LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION; LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE FUNDRAISING SOCIETY; THE 1940'S LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.85
related entity
1950 - 1956 LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY (0.85) — Entity A is a reunion society for former LCI students (1950-1956), a separate non-profit org formed by alumni. Entity B is the school itself. Related as alumni org vs. institution, but legally distinct entities.
related entity
1957-61 LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY (0.85) — Entity A is a reunion society for former students of Lethbridge Collegiate Institute (1957-61 cohort), a distinct non-profit org. Entity B is the school itself. They share a name but are legally separate organisations: alumni group vs. educ
related entity
LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (0.85) — Alumni Association is a separate non-profit org affiliated with Lethbridge Collegiate Institute (the school), not the same legal entity. Classic alumni body vs. parent institution relationship => RELATED.
related entity
LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE FUNDRAISING SOCIETY (0.85) — Entity A is a fundraising society (non-profit) distinct from Entity B (the school itself). These are related but legally separate organisations: the society supports the institute but is not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE 1940'S LETHBRIDGE COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE REUNION SOCIETY (0.85) — Entity A is a reunion society for 1940s alumni of Lethbridge Collegiate Institute; Entity B is the school itself. They share a name but are legally distinct organizations — alumni society vs. the institution.
The dataset shows LEUNG, ALDEN (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — CHU, VALERIE (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.); CLARK, AMANDA (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.); GIBBARD, EVAN (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.); PARK, GILYOUNG (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.); VIROGIN BIOTECH CANADA LTD.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.806
related entity
CHU, VALERIE (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.) (0.82) — Both records share 'Virogin Biotech Ltd.' but represent different named individuals (Chu, Valerie vs. Leung, Alden) as grant recipients. Same company affiliation but different people/records — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
CLARK, AMANDA (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.) (0.82) — Both records reference Virogin Biotech Ltd. but represent different named individuals (Clark, Amanda vs. Leung, Alden) as grant recipients. Same underlying company but different recipient persons — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
GIBBARD, EVAN (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.) (0.82) — Both records reference Virogin Biotech Ltd. but represent different named individuals (Evan Gibbard vs. Alden Leung) as grant recipients. Same company, different people — RELATED via shared employer, not the same legal entity record.
related entity
PARK, GILYOUNG (VIROGIN BIOTECH LTD.) (0.82) — Both records reference Virogin Biotech Ltd. as the affiliated company, but represent different individual grant recipients (Alden Leung vs. GilYoung Park). Same company, different people — RELATED via shared employer, not SAME entity.
related entity
VIROGIN BIOTECH CANADA LTD. (0.75) — Entity A names an individual (Alden Leung) affiliated with 'Virogin Biotech Ltd.' while Entity B is 'Virogin Biotech Canada Ltd.' — similar but distinct legal names, no shared BN, possibly related companies or name variants but not confirme
The dataset shows LI, JORDAN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — KOVACS, MITCHELL (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); ROY-STANG, DOMINIC (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); SMITH, MICHAEL (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); WISE, LAUREN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); ESPIAL GROUP INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.83
related entity
KOVACS, MITCHELL (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both reference Espial Group Inc. as the affiliated company, but represent different individual grant recipients (Mitchell Kovacs vs. Jordan Li). Same parent company, different persons — RELATED via shared employer/organization.
related entity
ROY-STANG, DOMINIC (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both records reference Espial Group Inc. but represent different individuals (Li, Jordan vs Roy-Stang, Dominic) acting as grant recipients under that company. Same parent company, different named contacts — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
SMITH, MICHAEL (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both entities share 'Espial Group Inc.' as the affiliated company but represent different individual grant recipients (Jordan Li vs. Michael Smith). Same company affiliation but different people — RELATED via shared employer, not SAME entit
related entity
WISE, LAUREN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both records share the same employer 'Espial Group Inc.' but represent different individuals (Li, Jordan vs. Wise, Lauren). They are related via the same company but are distinct grant recipient entities.
related entity
ESPIAL GROUP INC. (0.75) — Entity B 'Li, Jordan (Espial Group Inc.)' represents an individual (Jordan Li) affiliated with Espial Group Inc., not the company itself. The company in parentheses is the employer/affiliation, not an alternate name. These are distinct enti
recipient · LIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDE WALK
The dataset shows LIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDE WALK (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — LIONS CLUB OF CANADA GUIDE DOGS; Lions Foundation of Canada Dog Guides; LION'S FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDES; LIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDES; WALK FOR GUIDE DOGS; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.7
related entity
LIONS CLUB OF CANADA GUIDE DOGS (0.72) — Both relate to Lions Canada dog guide programs but differ in legal name ('Club' vs 'Foundation'), BN roots differ (A has BN 118837040, B has none), and 'Dog Guide Walk' suggests a fundraising event entity vs. the main charity. Likely affili
related entity
Lions Foundation of Canada Dog Guides (0.72) — Entity B 'DOG GUIDE WALK' appears to be a fundraising event/program name under Lions Foundation of Canada, not a separate legal entity. No shared BN root. Likely a campaign, not the same legal org. RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
LION'S FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDES (0.72) — Entity B 'Dog Guide Walk' appears to be a fundraising event/program of Entity A (Lions Foundation of Canada Dog Guides), not the same legal entity. No shared BN root; B has no BN. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
related entity
LIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADA DOG GUIDES (0.72) — Entity B 'DOG GUIDE WALK' appears to be a fundraising event/program of Entity A, not the same legal org. No shared BN root; B has only 1 source link and no BN. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
WALK FOR GUIDE DOGS (0.62) — Both appear linked to guide dog walking fundraising events, possibly both tied to Lions Foundation of Canada, but different names, no shared BN, and could be distinct registered charities or campaigns. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
The dataset shows LI, RUI (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — MUKHERJEE, ABHISHEK (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); THIRUGNANAM, SERAN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); WISE, LAUREN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); ESPIAL GROUP INC.; PATEL, URVA (ESPIAL GROUP INC.); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
MUKHERJEE, ABHISHEK (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both records reference Espial Group Inc. as the employer/org, but represent different individual grant recipients (Li, Rui vs. Mukherjee, Abhishek). Same company, different people — RELATED via shared parent org.
related entity
THIRUGNANAM, SERAN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both records reference Espial Group Inc. but represent different named individuals (Li, Rui vs. Thirugnanam, Seran) associated with that company. They share the same corporate affiliate but are distinct grant recipient entries.
related entity
WISE, LAUREN (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.85) — Both entities share 'Espial Group Inc.' as the employer/organisation but represent different individuals (Li, Rui vs. Wise, Lauren). Same company, different grant recipients — RELATED via shared parent org, not SAME entity.
related entity
ESPIAL GROUP INC. (0.82) — Entity B 'Li, Rui (Espial Group Inc.)' appears to be an individual (Li Rui) affiliated with Espial Group Inc., not the company itself. Person+employer format suggests a grant recipient individual, not the same legal org.
related entity
PATEL, URVA (ESPIAL GROUP INC.) (0.82) — Both records reference Espial Group Inc. as the employer/org, but represent different individual grant recipients (Li, Rui vs. Patel, Urva). Same corporate affiliate but distinct legal recipient entities in the grants data.
The dataset shows Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta Inc (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — LITTLE CAESARS BONNYVILLE; O/A LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA - SPRUCE GROVE; LITTLE CAESARS NORTHMOUNT; Little Caesars Pizza; LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF ALBERTA INC. (102 - 10903 23 AVENUE - EDMONTON); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 9 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.718
related entity
LITTLE CAESARS BONNYVILLE (0.75) — Entity A is a specific location/franchise 'Little Caesars Bonnyville' while Entity B is the Alberta corporate entity 'Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta Inc.' — likely franchisor vs. franchisee or parent vs. location. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
O/A LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA - SPRUCE GROVE (0.75) — Entity A is a single franchise location O/A Little Caesars Pizza in Spruce Grove; Entity B is the Alberta corporate franchisee operating multiple Edmonton locations. Same brand/franchisor but distinct legal operating entities at different l
related entity
LITTLE CAESARS NORTHMOUNT (0.72) — Entity A is a single location 'Northmount' likely operating as a franchise or DBA under Entity B (Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta Inc), a multi-location Alberta company. Different legal entities; A is likely a franchisee or location of B.
related entity
Little Caesars Pizza (0.72) — Entity A is a St. Albert franchise location (O/A Little Caesars St. Albert, BN 842430456); Entity B is a distinct Alberta corporate entity 'Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta Inc.' with no BN. Likely franchisor vs. franchisee or separate legal
related entity
LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA OF ALBERTA INC. (102 - 10903 23 AVENUE - EDMONTON) (0.65) — Both share the legal name 'Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta Inc.' but have different addresses (102-10903 23 Ave vs 240-6655 178 St, Edmonton). Likely same legal entity with multiple locations, but address differences and no BN to confirm —
recipient · LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT MOUNT ROYAL INC.
The dataset shows LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT MOUNT ROYAL INC. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARE INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION #2; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT MOUNT ROYAL; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 20 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.79
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC. (0.88) — Same 'Little Einsteins Childcare' brand but distinct legal incorporations at different locations (Sherwood vs Mount Royal). No shared BN root. Likely affiliated childcare centres under same operator but separate legal entities.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC. (0.82) — Both share 'Little Einsteins Childcare' brand but B is a distinct legal entity ('at Mount Royal Inc.') likely a separate location/franchise. No shared BN. Different legal names suggest related but not same organisation.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARE INC. (0.78) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' brand and childcare sector but are distinct legal entities: one is 'Daycare Inc.' and the other is 'Childcare at Mount Royal Inc.' — different legal names, no shared BN, likely affiliated but separate corporati
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION #2 (0.75) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' brand but are legally distinct: A is a community foundation (#2), B is a childcare operator at Mount Royal. Foundation vs. operating childcare company; likely affiliated under same brand but not the same legal
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT MOUNT ROYAL (0.72) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' and 'Mount Royal' but differ structurally: A is a 'Community Foundation' (non-profit foundation), B is a childcare operating company ('Inc.'). Likely related org vs. its foundation arm, not the same legal entit
recipient · LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC.
The dataset shows LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT MOUNT ROYAL INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT CASTLEDOWN INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS OSC AT KEHEEWIN INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT SHERWOOD; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 18 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT MOUNT ROYAL INC. (0.88) — Same 'Little Einsteins Childcare' brand but distinct legal incorporations at different locations (Sherwood vs Mount Royal). No shared BN root. Likely affiliated childcare centres under same operator but separate legal entities.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT CASTLEDOWN INC. (0.85) — Same 'Little Einsteins Childcare' brand but different legal entities: 'at Sherwood' vs 'at Castledown' indicate distinct locations/corporations. Likely affiliated under same operator but separate legal registrations.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS OSC AT KEHEEWIN INC. (0.82) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' brand but are distinct legal incorporations: one operates at Sherwood, the other at Keheewin. Different locations and different legal names suggest affiliated but separate entities under a common brand.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC. (0.72) — Both are childcare orgs sharing 'Little Einsteins Childcare' but A adds 'AT SHERWOOD' suggesting a specific location/branch. Likely related (same operator, different location entity) rather than identical legal orgs. No BN to confirm.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT SHERWOOD (0.72) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' and 'Sherwood' but A is a community foundation (non-profit) and B is a childcare inc. (for-profit/operator). Likely foundation affiliated with the childcare operator, not the same legal entity.
The dataset shows LITTLE EINSTEINS OSC AT KEHEEWIN INC. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE @ MAYFIELD INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC.; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION #2; LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT KEHEEWIN; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 13 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.778
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE AT SHERWOOD INC. (0.82) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' brand but are distinct legal incorporations: one operates at Sherwood, the other at Keheewin. Different locations and different legal names suggest affiliated but separate entities under a common brand.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE @ MAYFIELD INC. (0.82) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' brand but are distinct legal entities: one is a childcare at Mayfield, the other an OSC at Keheewin. Different locations/programs suggest affiliated but separate incorporated orgs under a common brand.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS CHILDCARE INC. (0.78) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' branding but are distinct legal entities: one is a general childcare inc., the other is an OSC (out-of-school care) at a specific location (Keheewin). Likely affiliated but separately incorporated.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION #2 (0.75) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' branding but are distinct legal entities: A is a community foundation (#2), B is an out-of-school care incorporated entity at Keheewin. Likely affiliated under same brand/network but not the same legal org.
related entity
LITTLE EINSTEINS DAYCARES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AT KEHEEWIN (0.72) — Both share 'Little Einsteins' and 'Keheewin' but differ structurally: A is a 'Community Foundation' (non-profit/charity), B is 'OSC Inc.' (Out-of-School Care, incorporated company). Likely affiliated but distinct legal entities.
The dataset shows LITTLE STEPS CHILDCARE FOUNDATION (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — LITTLE STEPS ACADEMY INC.; Little Steps Daycare & OSC Ltd.; Little Steps Development Centre Ltd; LITTLE STEPS PRESCHOOL LTD; VALLEYVIEW LITTLE STEPS EARLY LEARNING SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 42 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.72
related entity
LITTLE STEPS ACADEMY INC. (0.72) — Both share 'Little Steps' and childcare/academy context, suggesting affiliation. 'Childcare Foundation' (non-profit/charity) and 'Academy Inc.' (operating company) are likely related but legally distinct entities—foundation vs. operating co
related entity
Little Steps Daycare & OSC Ltd. (0.72) — Both involve 'Little Steps' childcare in AB but are distinct legal entities: A is a non-profit foundation, B is a for-profit Ltd. company (Blue Sky Daycare). Likely affiliated operators, not the same legal organisation.
related entity
Little Steps Development Centre Ltd (0.72) — Both share 'Little Steps' branding but are distinct legal entities: A is a non-profit childcare foundation (no BN), B is a company (Ltd, BN 836476317). Different legal structures and names suggest foundation vs. operating company relationsh
related entity
LITTLE STEPS PRESCHOOL LTD (0.72) — Both share 'Little Steps' and childcare/preschool focus in AB, suggesting affiliation. But 'Foundation' (non_profit) vs 'Preschool Ltd' (company) are distinct legal entities — likely related org vs operational arm.
related entity
VALLEYVIEW LITTLE STEPS EARLY LEARNING SOCIETY (0.72) — Both share 'Little Steps' and childcare/early learning focus in Alberta, suggesting affiliation. But different legal names—one is a 'Foundation', other is 'Valleyview...Society'—indicate distinct entities, possibly regional chapter or affil
The dataset shows LIU, OU (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — CHAU, ALBERT (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.); LAW, JACOB (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.); WHYTE, GRAHAM (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.); MUNIYAPPAN, ARTHI (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.); CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.786
related entity
CHAU, ALBERT (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.) (0.82) — Both records reference Cadex Electronics Inc. but list different named individuals (Albert Chau vs. Ou Liu) as grant recipients. They share the same company but are distinct recipient entries, not the same legal entity record.
related entity
LAW, JACOB (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.) (0.82) — Both records reference Cadex Electronics Inc. but represent different individuals (Jacob Law vs. Ou Liu) listed as grant recipients within the same company. Same employer/company, different people — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
WHYTE, GRAHAM (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.) (0.82) — Both records reference Cadex Electronics Inc. but represent different named individuals (Liu Ou vs. Whyte Graham) as grant recipients/contacts. Same company, different people — RELATED rather than SAME distinct legal entities.
related entity
MUNIYAPPAN, ARTHI (CADEX ELECTRONICS INC.) (0.75) — Both records reference Cadex Electronics Inc. but represent different individual grant recipients (Liu Ou vs. Muniyappan Arthi) within that company. Same employer/company but distinct persons, so RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
CADEX ELECTRONICS INC. (0.72) — Entity B names an individual (Liu, Ou) affiliated with Cadex Electronics Inc., not the legal entity itself. Person-in-parentheses format suggests a grant recipient record for an individual, not the company. RELATED rather than SAME.
L'NUEY (EPEKWITK ASSEMBLY OF COUNCILS INC.) FOR ABEGWEIT FIRST NATION AND LENNOX ISLAND FIRST NATION
medium
recipient · L'NUEY (EPEKWITK ASSEMBLY OF COUNCILS INC.) FOR ABEGWEIT FIRST NATION AND LENNOX ISLAND FIRST NATION
The dataset shows L'NUEY (EPEKWITK ASSEMBLY OF COUNCILS INC.) FOR ABEGWEIT FIRST NATION AND LENNOX ISLAND FIRST NATION (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — Lennox Island First Nation; Abegweit First Nation; LENNOX ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION|LENNOX ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; Epekwitk Assembly of Councils Inc. (L'nuey); Epekwitk Assembly of Councils; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.812
related entity
Lennox Island First Nation (0.92) — Entity B is L'Nuey/Epekwitk Assembly of Councils acting as an umbrella body FOR both Abegweit First Nation AND Lennox Island First Nation. Lennox Island First Nation is a member/beneficiary, not the same legal entity. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Abegweit First Nation (0.82) — Entity B is L'Nuey/Epekwitk Assembly of Councils acting on behalf of Abegweit FN and Lennox Island FN — a distinct intermediary/umbrella body. Entity A is Abegweit First Nation Wellness (BN 121629844). Different legal entities; B references
related entity
LENNOX ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION|LENNOX ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.82) — Entity A is Lennox Island Development Corporation (BN 804064749), a corporate arm of Lennox Island First Nation. Entity B is L'Nuey/Epekwitk Assembly of Councils representing BOTH Abegweit and Lennox Island First Nations jointly. Different
related entity
Epekwitk Assembly of Councils Inc. (L'nuey) (0.78) — Entity B names L'nuey acting specifically 'for Abegweit First Nation and Lennox Island First Nation' — a distinct grant recipient role/vehicle, not the same legal entity as L'nuey/Epekwitk Assembly of Councils Inc. itself. Prefer RELATED pe
related entity
Epekwitk Assembly of Councils (0.72) — Entity B is L'Nuey, a rights and title organization operating under/for Epekwitk Assembly of Councils Inc. on behalf of two First Nations — a distinct legal vehicle/program, not the same legal entity as EAC itself.
LOCAL #104 (DESMARAIS) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #104 (DESMARAIS) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #104 (DESMARAIS) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL 20/20 OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WABASCA-DESMARAIS METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.88
related entity
LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #104 (Desmarais) vs Local 1001 (Calgary). Different local numbers and different geographic locations confirm separate legal entities under a common parent body.
related entity
LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #120 (Anzac) and Local #104 (Desmarais) — different numbers, different communities. Same parent org but separate legal locals, so RELATED not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #104 (Desmarais) and Local #9 (Oyen) — different numbers, different communities, so separate legal entities under a common parent umbrella.
related entity
LOCAL 20/20 OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.82) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Métis association in Alberta but with different local numbers (104 Desmarais vs 20/20), different locations, and different names (Metis Association of Alberta vs Metis Nation of Alberta Association).
LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — LOCAL #20 (GRANDE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement; PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT SOCIETY; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 137 PADDLE PRAIRIE; PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.792
related entity
LOCAL #20 (GRANDE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different locations (Grande Prairie #20 vs Paddle Prairie #141). Same parent organization, different legal locals — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement (0.82) — Entity A is the Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement (a formal Métis settlement/government body with BN). Entity B is a local chapter of the Métis Association of Alberta. Related community organizations but distinct legal entities with different
related entity
PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT SOCIETY (0.78) — Both are Paddle Prairie Métis organizations but legally distinct: A is the Metis Settlement Society (local governance body under Alberta Metis Settlements Act); B is a local chapter (#141) of the Metis Association of Alberta, a separate pro
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 137 PADDLE PRAIRIE (0.72) — Both are Paddle Prairie Métis local councils but bear different local numbers (137 vs 141) and different parent org names (Metis Nation of Alberta Association vs Metis Association of Alberta), suggesting distinct registrations or different
LOCAL #171 (GRANDE CACHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #171 (GRANDE CACHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #171 (GRANDE CACHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — LOCAL 14 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #18 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #1984 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; Mountain Métis Nation Association (Métis Nation of Alberta Local Council #1994 of Grande Cache); it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.878
related entity
LOCAL 14 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (Grande Cache #171 vs Calgary #14). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #18 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (Calgary #18 vs Grande Cache #171). Same parent organization, different legal locals. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #171 in Grande Cache and Local 1001 in Calgary. Different local numbers and different cities; they share a parent organization but are separate legal entities.
related entity
LOCAL #1984 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #171 (Grande Cache) vs Local #1984. Different local numbers = different legal entities, but both affiliated to the same parent association.
LOCAL #177 (HINTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.
medium
recipient · LOCAL #177 (HINTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.
The dataset shows LOCAL #177 (HINTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA. (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — LOCAL #44 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #100 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.; LOCAL #5 (H.O.P.E.) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #97 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; HINTON METIS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 1988 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.846
related entity
LOCAL #44 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (Edson Local #44 vs Hinton Local #177). Same parent federation, different legal locals — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #100 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA. (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (Hinton #177 vs Edmonton #100). Different local numbers and locations indicate separate legal entities under a common parent body.
related entity
LOCAL #5 (H.O.P.E.) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #177 (Hinton) and Local #5 (H.O.P.E.) are different numbered locals with different names/locations, making them related affiliates not the same entity.
related entity
LOCAL #97 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.82) — Both are distinct local chapters of Métis associations in Alberta but different locals (177 Hinton vs 97 Edmonton), different cities, and slightly different parent org names (Metis Association of Alberta vs Metis Nation of Alberta Associati
LOCAL #1905 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #1905 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #1905 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #176 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.; LOCAL # 71 (PARKLAND) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #333 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.892
related entity
LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #120 (Anzac) and Local #1905 (St. Paul) — different numbered locals in different communities, so RELATED as affiliates under the same parent organization.
related entity
LOCAL #176 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA. (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (St. Paul #1905 vs Edson #176). Different local numbers and locations = separate legal entities under a common parent. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL # 71 (PARKLAND) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #1905 (St. Paul) and Local #71 (Parkland) — different numbers, different regions. Same parent federation but separate legal locals; RELATED not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (St. Paul #1905 vs Oyen #9). Same parent organization, different legal locals. RELATED not SAME.
LOCAL #1987 (LAC LA BICHE CENTRE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #1987 (LAC LA BICHE CENTRE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #1987 (LAC LA BICHE CENTRE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — LOCAL # 107 (LAC LA BICHE & EAST) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL # 114 (LAC LA BICHE MISSION) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LAC LA BICHE METIS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION #51; Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association; Métis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #2097 Lac La Biche; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.778
related entity
LOCAL # 107 (LAC LA BICHE & EAST) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta in the Lac La Biche area but have different local numbers (107 vs 1987) and different geographic designations (East vs Centre), indicating separate affiliated locals.
related entity
LOCAL # 114 (LAC LA BICHE MISSION) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are local chapters of Metis Association of Alberta in Lac La Biche, but different local numbers (#114 Mission vs #1987 Centre) and different location descriptors, indicating distinct affiliated chapters, not the same legal entity.
related entity
LAC LA BICHE METIS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION #51 (0.75) — Both are Métis organizations in Lac La Biche but have distinct legal identities: A is 'Metis Community Association #51', B is 'Local #1987 of the Metis Association of Alberta' — different numbering, different parent body. Likely related cha
related entity
Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (0.72) — Both are Métis organizations in Lac La Biche but have distinct identities: A is 'Triple 7' local, B is Local #1987 under Métis Association of Alberta. Different local numbers/names suggest separate chapters, not the same legal entity.
LOCAL #2001 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #2001 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #2001 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — LOCAL # 114 (LAC LA BICHE MISSION) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #115 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC LA BICHE METIS DISTRICT; LAC LA BICHE METIS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION #51; Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.786
related entity
LOCAL # 114 (LAC LA BICHE MISSION) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are distinct Métis Association of Alberta locals in Lac La Biche area but with different local numbers (#114 'Mission' vs #2001). Different local numbers indicate separate registered chapters, not the same legal entity.
related entity
LOCAL #115 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.82) — Both are locals of the Metis Association of Alberta based in Lac La Biche, but they carry different local numbers (#2001 vs #115), indicating distinct chartered local chapters of the same parent organization.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC LA BICHE METIS DISTRICT (0.82) — Both represent Métis interests in Lac La Biche. Entity A is a local chapter of the historic Metis Association of Alberta; Entity B is the successor Otipemisiwak Métis Government district council — successor/rebranded body, not identical leg
related entity
LAC LA BICHE METIS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION #51 (0.72) — Both are Métis organizations in Lac La Biche but have different legal names and numbering (#2001 vs #51). Entity A is a local of the Métis Association of Alberta; Entity B is a separate community association. Likely affiliated but distinct
LOCAL #228 (SMITH) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION
medium
recipient · LOCAL #228 (SMITH) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION
The dataset shows LOCAL #228 (SMITH) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — LOCAL 20/20 OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394; LOCAL #1984 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #649 (ARMIT) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.884
related entity
LOCAL 20/20 OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (Local 20/20 vs Local #228 Smith). Same parent organization but different numbered locals = separate legal entities, so RELATED not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394 (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (Local 394 vs Local 228 Smith). Same parent organization but different numbered locals = separate legal entities. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #1984 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Métis Nation of Alberta (formerly Métis Association of Alberta) — different local numbers (#1984 vs #228 Smith), different communities. Same parent federation but separate legal entities.
related entity
LOCAL #649 (ARMIT) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.85) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association/Nation of Alberta — different local numbers (#649 Armit vs #228 Smith) and different communities. They share a parent federation but are separate legal entities.
LOCAL #299(GRANDE PRAIRIE ALTA) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
medium
recipient · LOCAL #299(GRANDE PRAIRIE ALTA) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL #299(GRANDE PRAIRIE ALTA) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — LOCAL #1969 (GRANDE CACHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #214 (CHIPEWYAN PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; METIS ASSOCIATION LOCAL #474 HINTON, ALTA. ZONE 4; Métis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #1990 of Grande Prairie; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.886
related entity
LOCAL #1969 (GRANDE CACHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different locations (Grande Prairie Local #299 vs Grande Cache Local #1969). Same parent org, different locals — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #214 (CHIPEWYAN PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but different locals: #299 (Grande Prairie) vs #214 (Chipewyan Prairie). Same parent federation, different regional units => RELATED.
related entity
LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #299 (Grande Prairie) vs Local #601 (Paddle Prairie). Different local numbers and different locations indicate separate legal entities under the same parent umbrel
related entity
METIS ASSOCIATION LOCAL #474 HINTON, ALTA. ZONE 4 (0.85) — Both are local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but different numbered locals in different cities (Grande Prairie Local #299 vs Hinton Local #474). Same parent federation, distinct legal entities.
Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association
medium
recipient · Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association
The dataset shows Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC LA BICHE METIS DISTRICT; LOCAL # 107 (LAC LA BICHE & EAST) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #115 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #1987 (LAC LA BICHE CENTRE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #2001 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.74
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC LA BICHE METIS DISTRICT (0.82) — Entity A is Local #777 of the Metis Nation of Alberta (a local chapter/association). Entity B is the Otipemisiwak Metis Government District Council for Lac La Biche — a successor/restructured governing body. Same geographic area but distinc
related entity
LOCAL # 107 (LAC LA BICHE & EAST) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Métis organizations in Lac La Biche but appear to be distinct entities: A is 'Local Triple 7' (likely Local 777), B is 'Local #107'. Different local numbers suggest separate chapters, possibly under same parent Métis Association of
related entity
LOCAL #115 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Métis local organizations in Lac La Biche but have different local numbers (Triple 7 vs #115) and different parent affiliations. Likely distinct locals or same local at different eras/names—prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #1987 (LAC LA BICHE CENTRE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Métis organizations in Lac La Biche but have distinct identities: A is 'Triple 7' local, B is Local #1987 under Métis Association of Alberta. Different local numbers/names suggest separate chapters, not the same legal entity.
The dataset shows LONDON DRUGS (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — THE LONDON DRUGS FOUNDATION; London Drugs Limited #38 Lethbridge Town Square; LONDON DRUGS 34; LONDON DRUGS 45; LONDON DRUGS ON LINE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 20 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.738
related entity
THE LONDON DRUGS FOUNDATION (0.85) — Entity A is a registered public foundation (CRA BN 890276926) created to support charitable activities. Entity B is London Drugs the retail company receiving AB grants. Foundation is affiliated with but legally separate from the retail corp
related entity
London Drugs Limited #38 Lethbridge Town Square (0.75) — Entity B is a specific store location (London Drugs Limited #38, Lethbridge Town Square) — a legal entity or branch of the London Drugs corporate chain. Entity A is the broader trade name. Prefer RELATED over SAME as B appears to be a disti
related entity
LONDON DRUGS 34 (0.72) — LONDON DRUGS 34 appears to be a specific store location/branch of London Drugs chain. Same brand but different legal/operational entities — store number suffix suggests a distinct outlet. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
related entity
LONDON DRUGS 45 (0.72) — LONDON DRUGS 45 appears to be a specific store/branch number of London Drugs retail chain. Entity A is the broader brand/organization; Entity B is a specific location unit. Parent vs. store-level relationship => RELATED.
related entity
LONDON DRUGS ON LINE (0.65) — Both reference London Drugs brand but 'London Drugs On Line' appears to be a distinct online/e-commerce channel or separate legal entity, not simply a trade name variant. No BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
LOUGHEED, OLIVIA (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC)
medium
recipient · LOUGHEED, OLIVIA (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC)
The dataset shows LOUGHEED, OLIVIA (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — REUSCH, TAYLOR (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC); RIZK, HUSSAIN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC); MICHELINI, ALEXANDRIA (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC); NESBITT, RYAN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC); PATEL, PUJAN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
REUSCH, TAYLOR (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (0.85) — Both records share 'Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC' but represent different named individuals (Olivia Lougheed vs. Taylor Reusch) acting as grant recipients. Same company, different people — RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
RIZK, HUSSAIN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (0.85) — Both records represent different individuals (Olivia Lougheed and Hussain Rizk) who are grant recipients associated with the same company Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC. Same company, different people — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MICHELINI, ALEXANDRIA (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (0.82) — Both records share 'Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC' but represent different individual grant recipients (Olivia Lougheed vs. Alexandria Michelini). Same employer/org, different people. RELATED via shared corporate affiliation, not
related entity
NESBITT, RYAN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (0.82) — Both records share 'Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC' but represent different named individuals (Olivia Lougheed vs. Ryan Nesbitt) — likely lobbyists/reps for the same company. Same org, different persons; prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
PATEL, PUJAN (LABORIE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC) (0.75) — Both records share the same legal entity 'Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC' but represent different individual grant recipients (Olivia Lougheed vs Pujan Patel). Same company, different people — RELATED not SAME.
recipient · LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT MILITARY MUSEUM
The dataset shows LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT MILITARY MUSEUM (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL; THE LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT MUSEUM FOUNDATION; EDMONTON REGIMENT HISTORICAL SOCIETY; THE 49TH BATTALION THE LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT ASSOCIATION; 15 FIELD REGIMENT MUSEUM SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.718
related entity
LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL (0.75) — Both relate to the Loyal Edmonton Regiment but differ: A is the Advisory Council (charity, has BN), B is the Military Museum (no BN, fed grants). Likely affiliated organizations sharing regimental heritage but distinct legal entities.
related entity
THE LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT MUSEUM FOUNDATION (0.75) — Entity A is the registered charitable Foundation (BN 119242980) supporting the museum; Entity B appears to be the museum itself with no BN. Foundation vs. operating museum = RELATED, not SAME legal entity.
related entity
EDMONTON REGIMENT HISTORICAL SOCIETY (0.72) — Both relate to the Loyal Edmonton Regiment but appear distinct: A is a historical society/associates group (CRA charity BN 893738054), B is a military museum receiving federal grants. Likely affiliated but different legal entities with diff
related entity
THE 49TH BATTALION THE LOYAL EDMONTON REGIMENT ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Both relate to the Loyal Edmonton Regiment but are distinct entities: A is a military museum (grant recipient), B is the 49th Battalion veterans/regimental association (non-profit). Museum and association are separate legal orgs, likely aff
related entity
15 FIELD REGIMENT MUSEUM SOCIETY (0.65) — Both are Edmonton military museums but distinct: 15 Field Regiment Museum Society (CRA charity) vs Loyal Edmonton Regiment Military Museum (fed grants). Different regiments, likely separate legal entities sharing similar military museum man
recipient · LU, DYLAN (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.)
The dataset shows LU, DYLAN (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — CHEUNG, MANDY (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.); GILL, IVAN (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.); WANG, MINXING (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.); Evident Point Software Corporation; MCSAVANEY, SHANICE (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
CHEUNG, MANDY (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.) (0.85) — Both records share 'Evident Point Software Corp.' but represent different individual grant recipients (Mandy Cheung vs. Dylan Lu). Same company affiliate, different people — RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
GILL, IVAN (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.) (0.85) — Both records reference Evident Point Software Corp. but represent different named individuals (Ivan Gill vs. Dylan Lu) as grant recipients. Same company, different contact persons — RELATED rather than SAME distinct legal entities.
related entity
WANG, MINXING (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.) (0.85) — Both entries share 'Evident Point Software Corp.' but represent different named individuals (Lu, Dylan vs. Wang, Minxing) as grant recipients. Same company, different people/contacts — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Evident Point Software Corporation (0.82) — Both records reference Evident Point Software Corp. but represent different individual grant recipients (Brooks-Gauthier, Jordan vs. Lu, Dylan). Same underlying company, different people/records. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
MCSAVANEY, SHANICE (EVIDENT POINT SOFTWARE CORP.) (0.82) — Both records share 'Evident Point Software Corp.' but represent different named individuals (Lu Dylan vs McSavaney Shanice) listed as grant recipients under that company. Same company, different people/grants — RELATED not SAME.
recipient · LUPTON, JULIA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP)
The dataset shows LUPTON, JULIA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION LP) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — LUPTON, JULIA; HUI, JACE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); NGUYEN, ALISA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); RANGER, ADRIENNE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); SEHGAL, TWINKLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.726
related entity
LUPTON, JULIA (0.75) — Entity B names Julia Lupton acting on behalf of Pioneer Hi-Bred Production LP, suggesting a representative/agent role rather than the same standalone individual. The LP is a distinct legal entity; Julia Lupton is likely an employee or agent
related entity
HUI, JACE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.72) — Both share 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but differ in legal suffix (Company vs LP) and named individuals (Hui, Jace vs Lupton, Julia). Likely related entities within the Pioneer Hi-Bred umbrella but not the same legal entity.
related entity
NGUYEN, ALISA (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.72) — Both records reference 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but with different individual names (Lupton vs Nguyen) and slightly different entity suffixes (LP vs Company). Likely same parent org but different grant recipients or divisions — RELATED
related entity
RANGER, ADRIENNE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.72) — Both reference 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but with different individual names (Lupton vs Ranger) and slightly different org suffixes (LP vs Company). Likely same parent org but different grant recipients/contacts — RELATED rather than SAM
related entity
SEHGAL, TWINKLE (PIONEER HI-BRED PRODUCTION COMPANY) (0.72) — Both reference 'Pioneer Hi-Bred Production' but different individuals (Lupton vs Sehgal) and slightly different legal names (LP vs Company). Likely same parent org but different grant recipients/contacts. RELATED rather than SAME.
recipient · LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA - EPIPHANY OFFERINGS
The dataset shows LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA - EPIPHANY OFFERINGS (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY; EPIPHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH INC; EPIPHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH; Church of the Epiphany, Incorporated Synod of the Diocese of Huron; EPIPHANY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.778
related entity
CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY (0.82) — Entity A is a standalone CRA-registered charity (BN 890042849). Entity B is a designated offering/fund of Lutheran Church Canada, not the same legal org. Shared 'Epiphany' is coincidental; different denominations and structures.
related entity
EPIPHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH INC (0.82) — Entity B 'LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA - EPIPHANY OFFERINGS' appears to be a national denomination's offering/fund program, not the same legal entity as Entity A, a distinct incorporated local congregation with its own BN (137703682). RELATED via
related entity
EPIPHANY LUTHERAN CHURCH (0.78) — Entity B is 'Lutheran Church Canada - Epiphany Offerings', a qualified donee account under the national Lutheran Church Canada umbrella, not the same legal entity as the local Epiphany Lutheran Church (BN 107307043). Different BN roots; par
related entity
Church of the Epiphany, Incorporated Synod of the Diocese of Huron (0.75) — Entity B is 'Lutheran Church Canada - Epiphany Offerings', a qualified donee program under Lutheran Church Canada, not the same legal entity as Entity A 'Church of the Epiphany' (BN 118862721). Different BN roots, different legal structures
related entity
EPIPHANY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH (0.72) — Entity B is 'Lutheran Church Canada - Epiphany Offerings', a qualified donee listing under the national Lutheran Church Canada umbrella, not the same legal entity as the local Epiphany Evangelical Lutheran Church (BN 107307068). Different B
recipient · MACDONALD, MATTHEW (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION)
The dataset shows MACDONALD, MATTHEW (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — LIU, HENG (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION); ROUX, LOUIS (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION); SOLLAZZO, ANNA (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION); TEJANI, NAIM (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION); TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORP.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.824
related entity
LIU, HENG (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION) (0.85) — Both records share 'Tantalus Systems Corporation' but represent different individuals (Liu Heng vs MacDonald Matthew) as grant recipients. Same parent company, different people/grants. RELATED via shared employer, not SAME entity.
related entity
ROUX, LOUIS (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION) (0.85) — Both records reference Tantalus Systems Corporation but represent different individual contacts (Matthew MacDonald vs Louis Roux). Same underlying company, different named recipients — RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
SOLLAZZO, ANNA (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION) (0.85) — Both records share 'Tantalus Systems Corporation' but represent different named individuals (MacDonald vs Sollazzo) as grant recipients. They are related via the same parent company but are distinct recipient records.
related entity
TEJANI, NAIM (TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORPORATION) (0.85) — Both records share 'Tantalus Systems Corporation' but represent different named individuals (MacDonald vs Tejani) acting as grant recipients. Same company, different contact persons — RELATED rather than SAME distinct legal entities.
related entity
TANTALUS SYSTEMS CORP. (0.72) — Entity B appears to be an individual (Matthew MacDonald) with employer Tantalus Systems Corporation in parentheses — a person+org composite record, not the legal entity itself. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
recipient · Magic Mountain Child Development Centre Ltd
The dataset shows Magic Mountain Child Development Centre Ltd (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — Magic Mountain Child Development Centre (Kings Heights) Ltd; MAGIC MOUNTAIN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE LTD. (2868 MAIN STREET S - AIRDRIE); MAGIC MOUNTAIN DAY CARE LTD.; MAGIC MOUNTAIN LTD.|MAGIC MOUNTAIN LTD.; MAGIC MOUNTAIN E.C.S. SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 415 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.726
related entity
Magic Mountain Child Development Centre (Kings Heights) Ltd (0.82) — Entity A is specifically the 'Kings Heights' location of Magic Mountain Child Development Centre Ltd, while Entity B includes a 'Sierra Springs' location variant. These appear to be separate legal entities (different Ltd. incorporations) un
related entity
MAGIC MOUNTAIN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE LTD. (2868 MAIN STREET S - AIRDRIE) (0.72) — Both share 'Magic Mountain Child Development Centre Ltd' but Entity B adds 'Sierra Springs' suggesting a different location/branch. Entity A is at 2868 Main St S Airdrie; B likely a Sierra Springs location. Same company, different sites — R
related entity
MAGIC MOUNTAIN DAY CARE LTD. (0.72) — Both share 'Magic Mountain' childcare branding in Alberta but differ: A is 'Day Care Ltd', B is 'Child Development Centre Ltd' with 'Sierra Springs' location qualifier. Likely sibling locations under same operator, not identical legal entit
related entity
MAGIC MOUNTAIN LTD.|MAGIC MOUNTAIN LTD. (0.72) — Entity A is a legal company (BN 103453403) named Magic Mountain Ltd. Entity B appears to be an operating child development centre (Sierra Springs location) possibly run by or under Magic Mountain Ltd., but different legal identity/name. Pre
related entity
MAGIC MOUNTAIN E.C.S. SOCIETY (0.65) — Both share 'Magic Mountain' branding in childcare/ECS space in Alberta. Entity A is a non-profit ECS society; Entity B appears to be a child development centre (Sierra Springs location). Likely affiliated but distinct legal entities — prefe
MAILLET, LARA-ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE
medium
recipient · MAILLET, LARA-ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE
The dataset shows MAILLET, LARA-ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.76) — THERRIEN, MARIE-CHRISTINE-ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE; BOURGEOIS, ISABELLE
ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE; CHARBONNEAU, ÉTIENNE
ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE; MAILLET, LARA; RIOUX OUIMET, HUBERT (ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.764
related entity
THERRIEN, MARIE-CHRISTINE-ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE (0.82) — Both records represent different individuals (Maillet, Lara vs Therrien, Marie-Christine) affiliated with the same institution, École nationale d'administration publique. Same org, different named grant recipients — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
BOURGEOIS, ISABELLE
ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE (0.75) — Both records reference École nationale d'administration publique but with different individual names (Bourgeois, Isabelle vs. Maillet, Lara), suggesting different grant recipients affiliated with the same institution. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CHARBONNEAU, ÉTIENNE
ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE (0.75) — Both entities share 'École nationale d'administration publique' but are linked to different individual researchers (Charbonneau vs. Maillet). Same institution, different grant recipients/researchers. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MAILLET, LARA (0.75) — Entity B appears to be Lara Maillet in her capacity as an employee/researcher at École nationale d'administration publique. Same individual but B is tied to a specific institutional affiliation, making them RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
RIOUX OUIMET, HUBERT (ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE) (0.75) — Both records reference École nationale d'administration publique but represent different named individuals (Maillet, Lara vs. Rioux Ouimet, Hubert) associated with the institution. Same parent org, different grant recipients.
The dataset shows Massey Vanier Bursary (English) (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.75) — Massey Vanier Bursary - French Student; BEDFORD DISTRICT 21, MASSEY VANIER BURSARY FUND; Massey Vanier Scholarship and Bursary Fund; MASSEY VANIER SCHOLARSHIP - ENGLISH; THE FRIENDS OF MASSEY VANIER; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.752
related entity
Massey Vanier Bursary - French Student (0.88) — Both are Massey Vanier Bursary funds but explicitly distinguished by language stream (English vs. French student). No shared BN. These are separate designated funds/trusts under the same umbrella, not bilingual names for one entity.
related entity
BEDFORD DISTRICT 21, MASSEY VANIER BURSARY FUND (0.72) — Both involve 'Massey Vanier Bursary' but Entity B is specifically 'Bedford District 21' — a distinct regional/district fund, not the same legal entity as the general English bursary. Likely affiliated but separate organisations.
related entity
Massey Vanier Scholarship and Bursary Fund (0.72) — Both reference 'Massey Vanier' bursary programs but Entity A has a BN root and covers scholarship+bursary; Entity B is English-language bursary only with no BN, suggesting a separate or sub-fund account rather than the same legal entity.
related entity
MASSEY VANIER SCHOLARSHIP - ENGLISH (0.72) — Both are Massey Vanier English-language CRA qualified donees but one is a Scholarship and the other a Bursary — likely distinct funds/programs under a common foundation, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE FRIENDS OF MASSEY VANIER (0.72) — Both relate to Massey Vanier but are distinct entities: A is a registered public foundation (BN 850085051) supporting Massey-Vanier school; B is a qualified donee bursary fund with no BN. Different legal structures and purposes.
The dataset shows MCCOURT, TREVOR (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — HUNT, KEVIN (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC); PERNA, DAVID (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC); JANSEN, LELAND (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC); WELLS, ERIC (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC); ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
HUNT, KEVIN (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC) (0.85) — Both records reference Zaber Technologies Inc but with different individual names (Hunt, Kevin vs McCourt, Trevor). These are different people associated with the same company — RELATED via shared employer, not the same legal entity.
related entity
PERNA, DAVID (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC) (0.85) — Both records reference Zaber Technologies Inc but represent different individual grant recipients (McCourt, Trevor vs Perna, David). Same company, different people — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
JANSEN, LELAND (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC) (0.82) — Both records share 'Zaber Technologies Inc' as the employer/org but represent different named individuals (Jansen, Leland vs McCourt, Trevor). Same company, different grant recipients — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
WELLS, ERIC (ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC) (0.82) — Both records reference Zaber Technologies Inc but represent different named individuals (McCourt, Trevor vs Wells, Eric) as grant recipients. Same company, different people/contacts — RELATED rather than SAME distinct legal entities.
related entity
ZABER TECHNOLOGIES INC. (0.75) — Entity B appears to be an individual (Trevor McCourt) acting as a grant recipient on behalf of Zaber Technologies Inc., not the legal entity itself. Person-as-recipient wrapper vs. the company => RELATED, not SAME.
MCLAUGHLIN IAN AND PHYLLIS AND PATRICK AND FREDERICK
medium
recipient · MCLAUGHLIN IAN AND PHYLLIS AND PATRICK AND FREDERICK
The dataset shows MCLAUGHLIN IAN AND PHYLLIS AND PATRICK AND FREDERICK (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — Frederick McLaughlin; McLaughlin Ian George and Phyllis June; MCLAUGHLIN PATRICK; MCLAUGHLIN FREDERICK AND IAN; MCLAUGHLIN IAN AND PATRICK AND PHYLLIS; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 13 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.718
related entity
Frederick McLaughlin (0.82) — Entity B is a multi-person group grant recipient (Ian, Phyllis, Patrick, AND Frederick McLaughlin), likely a family farming operation. Entity A is Frederick McLaughlin individually. Related family members, not the same legal entity.
related entity
McLaughlin Ian George and Phyllis June (0.75) — Entity B includes Ian and Phyllis (Entity A's members) plus Patrick and Frederick — likely a family farming operation or partnership that expanded. Related but not the same legal entity due to additional named individuals.
related entity
MCLAUGHLIN PATRICK (0.75) — Entity B names a family group (Ian, Phyllis, Patrick, Frederick McLaughlin) while Entity A is solely Patrick McLaughlin. Patrick appears in both but B is a multi-person family grant recipient, not the same legal entity as A alone.
related entity
MCLAUGHLIN FREDERICK AND IAN (0.65) — Both names share McLaughlin Frederick and Ian as members, but Entity B includes additional individuals (Phyllis, Patrick). Likely overlapping family farming/grant recipients but not identical legal entities. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
MCLAUGHLIN IAN AND PATRICK AND PHYLLIS (0.62) — Both are Alberta grant recipients sharing Ian, Patrick, and Phyllis McLaughlin, but B adds 'Frederick'. Different member composition suggests distinct legal partnerships/groups, not the same entity. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
The dataset shows MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. - L'ÉCHO ABITIBIEN (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. - LE CANADA FRANÇAIS; Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C. - Les Affaires Plus; MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. - LA FRONTIÈRE; MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. / TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P.; CORPORATION SUN MÉDIA - L'ÉCHO ABITIBIEN; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.812
related entity
MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. - LE CANADA FRANÇAIS (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications under the same legal entity 'Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C.' but represent distinct newspaper titles (Le Canada Français vs L'Écho Abitibien), making them related imprints of the same parent partnership, no
related entity
Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C. - Les Affaires Plus (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications under Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C. legal entity but represent different publications (Les Affaires Plus vs L'Écho Abitibien). Same parent company, different operational units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. - LA FRONTIÈRE (0.82) — Both are divisions/publications of Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C. but represent distinct newspaper titles (La Frontière vs L'Écho Abitibien). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C. / TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. (0.82) — Both share the legal entity 'MÉDIAS TRANSCONTINENTAL S.E.N.C.' but A is a specific publication division (L'ÉCHO ABITIBIEN) while B is the broader parent/general partnership entity operating multiple titles. Division vs. parent => RELATED.
related entity
CORPORATION SUN MÉDIA - L'ÉCHO ABITIBIEN (0.72) — Both refer to L'Écho Abitibien newspaper but under different legal parent entities: Sun Média Corporation vs. Médias Transcontinental S.E.N.C. These are distinct legal owners of the same publication — likely a succession/acquisition, making
MEDICINE HAT AERIE NO 2112 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES
medium
recipient · MEDICINE HAT AERIE NO 2112 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES
The dataset shows MEDICINE HAT AERIE NO 2112 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — ALBERTA/SASKATCHEWAN PROVINCIAL AERIE OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIE 2100 LETHBRIDGE; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES - CALGARY HERITAGE AERIE 2098; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 4241 EDMONTON CLUB; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIE 3475 CLUB; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.892
related entity
ALBERTA/SASKATCHEWAN PROVINCIAL AERIE OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES (0.92) — Entity A is the provincial governing body (Alberta/Saskatchewan) of the Fraternal Order of Eagles; Entity B is a local chapter/aerie (No. 2112) in Medicine Hat. Same fraternal organization but parent/regional vs. local chapter — RELATED.
related entity
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIE 2100 LETHBRIDGE (0.92) — Both are local Aeries of the Fraternal Order of Eagles in Alberta but different chapters: Aerie 2112 in Medicine Hat vs Aerie 2100 in Lethbridge. Different cities, different aerie numbers = distinct legal entities, but affiliated under the
related entity
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES - CALGARY HERITAGE AERIE 2098 (0.92) — Both are local Aeries of the Fraternal Order of Eagles in Alberta, but different numbered chapters in different cities (Medicine Hat #2112 vs Calgary Heritage #2098). Same parent fraternal organization, different legal local chapters.
related entity
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 4241 EDMONTON CLUB (0.85) — Both are local chapters (aeries) of the Fraternal Order of Eagles but in different cities (Edmonton #4241 vs Medicine Hat #2112). Same parent fraternal organization, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIE 3475 CLUB (0.85) — Both are local Aeries (chapters) of the Fraternal Order of Eagles in Alberta, but they have different Aerie numbers (3475 vs 2112) and likely different locations, making them distinct legal entities under the same national fraternal organiz
MEDICINE HAT CHAPTER SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBERSHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA
medium
recipient · MEDICINE HAT CHAPTER SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBERSHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA
The dataset shows MEDICINE HAT CHAPTER SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBERSHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.92) — SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, EDMONTON CHAPTER; SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION & ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBERSHOP QUARTET SINGING - LETHBRIDGE CHAPTER; ST. JOHN'S NEWFOUNDLAND CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, CORP.; THE GREATER VANCOUVER (BRITISH COLUMBIA) CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA; THE LANGLEY BRITISH COLUMBIA, CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THEPRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.92
related entity
SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, EDMONTON CHAPTER (0.92) — Both are local chapters of SPEBSQSA but in different cities (Medicine Hat vs Edmonton). Same parent organization, different regional chapters = RELATED not SAME.
related entity
SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION & ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBERSHOP QUARTET SINGING - LETHBRIDGE CHAPTER (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the same barbershop singing organization (SPEBSQSA) but in different cities (Lethbridge vs Medicine Hat). Different regional chapters = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
ST. JOHN'S NEWFOUNDLAND CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, CORP. (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the same Barbershop Quartet Singing in America society, but different chapters in different cities (St. John's NL vs Medicine Hat AB) with different BN roots. Regional chapters = RELATED, not SAME.
recipient · MEMORIAL SALEM UNITED CHURCH OF MEDICINE HAT
The dataset shows MEMORIAL SALEM UNITED CHURCH OF MEDICINE HAT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.65) — SALEM UNITED CHURCH; SALEM UNITED CHURCH; Salem United Church; SALEM UNITED CHURCH; SALEM UNITED CHURCH; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.646
related entity
SALEM UNITED CHURCH (0.72) — Both are United Church congregations sharing 'Salem' but Entity B is 'Memorial Salem United Church of Medicine Hat' — a distinct named congregation likely in Medicine Hat, AB. No shared BN; different full legal names suggest related but sep
related entity
SALEM UNITED CHURCH (0.65) — Entity B has a fuller name 'Memorial Salem United Church of Medicine Hat' suggesting a specific congregation, while Entity A 'Salem United Church' has a CRA BN but no city. No shared BN root; likely related congregations under United Church
related entity
Salem United Church (0.62) — Names overlap (Salem United Church) but Entity B specifies 'Memorial Salem' in Medicine Hat, AB, while Entity A has a CRA BN with no city specified. Different names and no shared BN; likely related congregations, not same legal entity.
related entity
SALEM UNITED CHURCH (0.62) — Entity B includes 'Memorial' prefix and 'of Medicine Hat' suffix, suggesting a distinct but related congregation. No shared BN root; different datasets. Likely same United Church community but possibly a different legal entity or former/mer
related entity
SALEM UNITED CHURCH (0.62) — Entity B is 'Memorial Salem United Church of Medicine Hat' — a distinct named congregation in a specific city. Entity A has a CRA BN but no city. Different full legal names, no shared BN. Likely related United Church congregations, not the
recipient · MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND LIBRARIES
The dataset shows MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND LIBRARIES (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND - MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY PRESS; ADAMS, KI (MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND); LAU, JAMES (MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND); Memorial University of Newfoundland; MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.826
related entity
MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND - MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY PRESS (0.85) — Both are units of Memorial University of Newfoundland but represent distinct operational divisions: Libraries vs. Memorial University Press. Same parent institution, different departments/units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
ADAMS, KI (MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND) (0.82) — Entity A is a named individual researcher (Adams, Ki) at Memorial University of Newfoundland — a grant recipient. Entity B is the Memorial University of Newfoundland Libraries — a distinct organisational unit. Both relate to MUN but are not
related entity
LAU, JAMES (MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND) (0.82) — Entity A is an individual researcher (James Lau) affiliated with Memorial University of Newfoundland. Entity B is the MUN Libraries department. Both relate to MUN but are distinct entities: one is a person/grant recipient, the other an inst
related entity
Memorial University of Newfoundland (0.82) — Libraries is a department/unit of Memorial University of Newfoundland, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root for B. Parent/subsidiary relationship: university contains its libraries division.
related entity
MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR (0.82) — Memorial University Libraries is a department/unit of Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, not the same legal entity. No shared BN. Parent-subsidiary/affiliate relationship; prefer RELATED over SAME.
recipient · MERIT HOTEL & SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 5 CORPORATION
The dataset shows MERIT HOTEL & SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 5 CORPORATION (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — FRANKLIN HOTEL AND SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 6 CORPORATION; RADISSON HOTEL AND SUITES FORT MCMURRAY TREIT HOLDINGS 8 CORPORATION; VANTAGE INN AND SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 9 CORPORATION; TREIT HOLDINGS 3 CORPORATION; MERIT HOTEL; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
FRANKLIN HOTEL AND SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 6 CORPORATION (0.85) — Both are TREIT Holdings numbered corporations (5 and 6) operating hotels in Alberta, suggesting they are sibling entities under a common TREIT holding structure, not the same legal entity. Different hotel brands and different numbered corpo
related entity
RADISSON HOTEL AND SUITES FORT MCMURRAY TREIT HOLDINGS 8 CORPORATION (0.85) — Both share 'TREIT HOLDINGS' naming pattern suggesting common parent/fund family, but are distinct numbered corporations (8 vs 5) operating different hotel brands in likely different locations. Affiliate entities, not the same legal org.
related entity
VANTAGE INN AND SUITES TREIT HOLDINGS 9 CORPORATION (0.85) — Both are TREIT Holdings corporations operating Alberta hotels but with different numbers (5 vs 9) and different hotel brands (Merit Hotel & Suites vs Vantage Inn and Suites), indicating separate legal entities within the same TREIT corporat
related entity
TREIT HOLDINGS 3 CORPORATION (0.82) — Both share 'TREIT HOLDINGS' branding but are numbered differently (3 vs 5) and B includes 'MERIT HOTEL & SUITES' trade name. Likely affiliated entities under same TREIT group but distinct legal corporations.
related entity
MERIT HOTEL (0.72) — Both share 'Merit Hotel' branding but Entity B includes a distinct legal entity name 'TREIT HOLDINGS 5 CORPORATION', suggesting a property holding company vs. the operating hotel. Likely related but not the same legal entity.
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 137 PADDLE PRAIRIE
medium
recipient · METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 137 PADDLE PRAIRIE
The dataset shows METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 137 PADDLE PRAIRIE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 1885; Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement; PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT SOCIETY; LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.786
related entity
THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 1885 (0.85) — Both are distinct Metis Nation of Alberta local councils but with different council numbers/names: Council 137 (Paddle Prairie) vs Council 1885. Same parent organization (MNA) but separate legal local chapters.
related entity
Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement (0.82) — Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement is the formal government settlement entity (BN 128552890, multi-dataset). Entity B is a local Métis Nation of Alberta council chapter in the same community — related but legally distinct organisations.
related entity
PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT SOCIETY (0.82) — Both are distinct Métis organizations in Paddle Prairie, AB. The Settlement Society is a land-governance body under Alberta Metis Settlements Act; Local Council 137 is a Metis Nation of Alberta chapter. Related but legally separate entities
related entity
LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Paddle Prairie Métis local councils but bear different local numbers (137 vs 141) and different parent org names (Metis Nation of Alberta Association vs Metis Association of Alberta), suggesting distinct registrations or different
related entity
LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Métis local councils in Paddle Prairie but have different local numbers (601 vs 137) and different parent body names (Metis Association of Alberta vs Metis Nation of Alberta Association), suggesting distinct registered locals, poss
Metis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council St. Albert - Sturgeon County
medium
recipient · Metis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council St. Albert - Sturgeon County
The dataset shows Metis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council St. Albert - Sturgeon County (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL # 1896 OF ST. PAUL; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL #214 OF CHARD; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 222 OF COLD LAKE; THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 1885; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 2359 ST. ALBERT; it appears in 2 datasets (ab, fed) with 7 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.86
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL # 1896 OF ST. PAUL (0.92) — Both are distinct Metis Nation of Alberta local councils but with different council numbers and locations: Local 1904 (St. Albert-Sturgeon County) vs Local 1896 (St. Paul). Same parent org, different chapters.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL #214 OF CHARD (0.92) — Both are distinct Metis Nation of Alberta Association local councils but in different locations (St. Albert-Sturgeon County Local 1904 vs. Chard Local #214). Same parent org, different chapters => RELATED.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 222 OF COLD LAKE (0.92) — Both are distinct local councils under the Metis Nation of Alberta Association but serve different geographic areas: St. Albert/Sturgeon County (Local 1904) vs. Cold Lake (Local 222). Different locations = different legal entities, related
related entity
THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 1885 (0.82) — Both are Metis Nation of Alberta Association local councils, but different chapters: A is Local 1904 St. Albert-Sturgeon County; B is Local Council 1885. Same parent association, different regional locals — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL COUNCIL 2359 ST. ALBERT (0.72) — Both are Metis Nation of Alberta local councils in St. Albert area, but Entity A is 'Local 1904 St. Albert-Sturgeon County' and Entity B is 'Local Council 2359 St. Albert' — different council numbers suggest distinct local chapters, not the
The dataset shows MÉTIS NATION OF ALBERTA - LOCAL #845 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.93) — Métis Nation of Alberta Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA - LOCAL 780; Métis Nation of Alberta; MÉTIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 125; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 492; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.932
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935 (0.95) — Both are local chapters of Métis Nation of Alberta but with different local numbers (1935 vs 845), different BNs, and distinct legal identities. Same parent organization, different subordinate chapters => RELATED.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA - LOCAL 780 (0.95) — Both are local chapters of Métis Nation of Alberta but with different local numbers (780 vs 845), making them distinct regional units under the same parent organization — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta (0.92) — Entity B is a local chapter (#845) of Entity A (Métis Nation of Alberta). Regional chapter vs. parent organization — RELATED per rules. They are not the same legal entity.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 125 (0.92) — Both are local chapters of Métis Nation of Alberta but with different local numbers (125 vs 845), making them distinct legal entities under the same parent organisation. Per rules, regional chapter vs. national => RELATED.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 492 (0.92) — Both are local chapters of Métis Nation of Alberta but different numbered locals (492 vs 845). No shared BN root. Same parent organization, different regional units => RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows METIS NATION OF ALBERTA - LOCAL 87 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.91) — Metis Nation of Alberta - Fort McMurray Metis Local 1935; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 492; Métis Nation of Alberta Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 1990; METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.912
related entity
Metis Nation of Alberta - Fort McMurray Metis Local 1935 (0.95) — Both are local chapters of Metis Nation of Alberta but different numbered locals (1935 vs 87), different BN roots (A has BN 872171368, B has none). Distinct regional chapters = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 492 (0.95) — Both are Metis Nation of Alberta locals but different numbered chapters (492 vs 87). Different BN roots (A has BN 900015801, B has none). Regional chapters of same parent org = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935 (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of Métis Nation of Alberta — Local 1935 (Fort McMurray, BN 870661907) vs Local 87. Different local numbers, different BNs, different geographic chapters. Same parent org but separate legal entities.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA LOCAL 1990 (0.92) — Both are local chapters of Metis Nation of Alberta but have different local numbers (1990 vs 87), different BN roots (A has BN 866874258, B has none), indicating distinct legal entities under the same parent organization.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394 (0.82) — Both are local chapters of Metis Nation of Alberta but different numbered locals (87 vs 394), making them distinct legal entities under the same provincial association. RELATED as regional chapters of same parent body.
The dataset shows MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 2 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.96) — MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO (REGION 3); MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 7; MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9; METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4; Métis Nation of Ontario; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.956
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO (REGION 3) (0.97) — Both are regional bodies of Métis Nation of Ontario but distinct units: Region 2 vs Region 3. Same parent org, different regional chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 7 (0.97) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but distinct units (Region 2 vs Region 7). Same parent organisation, different regional bodies — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9 (0.97) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but represent distinct geographic regions (Region 2 vs. Region 9). Same parent organization, different regional entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4 (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but different regions (Region 4 vs Region 2). Same parent organization, distinct regional entities. Regional chapter vs regional chapter => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Métis Nation of Ontario (0.92) — Entity B is a regional chapter (Region 2) of the Métis Nation of Ontario. Regional chapters are sub-units, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root. Per rules, regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED.
The dataset shows MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO (REGION 3) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.93) — MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 2; MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 7; MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9; METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4; Métis Nation of Ontario; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.928
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 2 (0.97) — Both are regional bodies of Métis Nation of Ontario but distinct units: Region 2 vs Region 3. Same parent org, different regional chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 7 (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but represent different numbered regions (Region 3 vs Region 7). Same parent organization, distinct regional entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9 (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but different numbered regions (Region 3 vs Region 9). Same parent organization, distinct regional affiliates — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4 (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but different regions (Region 4 vs Region 3). Same parent organization, distinct regional entities. Per rules, regional chapter vs. national/sibling => RELATED.
related entity
Métis Nation of Ontario (0.85) — Entity B is a regional chapter (Region 3) of the Métis Nation of Ontario, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root. Regional chapter vs. provincial organization => RELATED per rules.
The dataset shows MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 7 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 5 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.94) — MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 2; MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO (REGION 3); METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4; MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9; Métis Nation of Ontario; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.53 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
5
avg related confidence
0.94
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 2 (0.97) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but distinct units (Region 2 vs Region 7). Same parent organisation, different regional bodies — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO (REGION 3) (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but represent different numbered regions (Region 3 vs Region 7). Same parent organization, distinct regional entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
METIS NATION OF ONTARIO - REGION 4 (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but different numbered regions (Region 4 vs Region 7), making them distinct legal entities under the same parent organization — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO – REGION 9 (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of Métis Nation of Ontario but different numbered regions (7 vs 9), making them distinct legal/administrative units under the same parent organization — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Métis Nation of Ontario (0.88) — Entity B is a regional chapter (Region 7) of the Métis Nation of Ontario. Regional subdivisions are distinct organisational units subordinate to the parent body, so RELATED not SAME. No shared BN root confirms separation.
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WABASCA-DESMARAIS METIS DISTRICT (0.82) — Both relate to Métis community in Desmarais area. Entity A is a local chapter of the historic Metis Association of Alberta; Entity B is the modern Otipemisiwak Metis Government district council for Wabasca-Desmarais. Successor/reorganized b
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION (0.72) — Entity A is a local chapter (#141) of the Metis Association of Alberta in Paddle Prairie; Entity B is the Paddle Prairie Metis Settlement Association — related by geography/community but distinct legal organisations with different mandates
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Mountain Métis Nation Association (Métis Nation of Alberta Local Council #1994 of Grande Cache) (0.72) — Both are Grande Cache Métis locals but under different umbrella bodies and different local numbers (#171 Métis Association of Alberta vs #1994 Métis Nation of Alberta). Likely predecessor/successor or separate registration periods, not conf
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
HINTON METIS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 1988 OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.62) — Both are Hinton Métis local chapters of Métis Association of Alberta but carry different local numbers (1988 vs 177), suggesting distinct registered locals or possibly the same org under different numbering systems at different times. Prefe
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
LOCAL #333 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.75) — Both are St. Paul Métis locals but have different local numbers (#1905 vs #333) and slightly different parent org names (Metis Association of Alberta vs Metis Nation of Alberta Association), suggesting distinct locals or different eras of t
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #2097 Lac La Biche (0.72) — Both are Métis local councils in Lac La Biche but have different local numbers (#2097 vs #1987) and different parent org names (Métis Nation of Alberta Association vs Metis Association of Alberta), suggesting distinct historical entities or
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Local #777 (Lac La Biche) of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (0.72) — Both are Métis local organisations in Lac La Biche but have distinct identities: A is 'Triple 7' local, B is Local #2001 under Métis Association of Alberta. Likely separate chartered locals, not same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
LOCAL #9 (OYEN) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.82) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Nation of Alberta (different local numbers and towns: #9 Oyen vs #228 Smith). Same parent federation but separate legal entities at different locations.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta Association Local Council #1990 of Grande Prairie (0.82) — Both are Métis local councils in Grande Prairie but have different local numbers (#299 vs #1990) and different parent org names (Métis Association of Alberta vs Métis Nation of Alberta Association). Likely historical predecessor/successor o
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
LOCAL #2001 (LAC LA BICHE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both are Métis local organisations in Lac La Biche but have distinct identities: A is 'Triple 7' local, B is Local #2001 under Métis Association of Alberta. Likely separate chartered locals, not same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
2
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
THE GREATER VANCOUVER (BRITISH COLUMBIA) CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the same SPEBSQSA organization but in different cities (Greater Vancouver vs. Medicine Hat) with different BN roots and different datasets. Same parent organization, different legal entities.
related entity
THE LANGLEY BRITISH COLUMBIA, CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY FOR THEPRESERVATION AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF BARBER SHOP QUARTET SINGING IN AMERICA, INC. (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the same parent organization (SPEBSQSA) but in different cities (Langley BC vs Medicine Hat AB), different BN roots, different datasets. Regional chapters of same parent => RELATED, not SAME.
