The dataset shows entities the upstream entity-resolution pipeline adjudicated as RELATED to other funded entities — distinct legal registrations that share a name, structure, or governance lineage — where related-party relationships are more likely to materialise.
Detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
At-a-glance
50 of 17,501 matches on this page · filtering clear filter ×
Glassbox surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is a calibrated read on how strongly the dataset matches the pattern definition — a starting point for review, not a verdict.
● Observation
The match meets the pattern threshold but the signal is the lower band. Normal review queue.
● Attention
The match exceeds the routine threshold. Worth a closer look — pull the source rows, walk the citation.
● Flag
The match is in the highest band of the calibrated scale. Recommend: prioritise for active review.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
Live table · computed Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:16:17 GMT
MONTREAL CHALLENGER LEAGUE
medium
recipient · MONTREAL CHALLENGER LEAGUE
The dataset shows MONTREAL CHALLENGER LEAGUE (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — BURNABY CHALLENGER LEAGUE; SOUTH DELTA CHALLENGER LEAGUE; DES LAURENTIDES CHALLENGER LEAGUE; PARKLAND CHALLENGER LEAGUE; CORRIDOR CHALLENGER LEAGUE; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.785
related entity
BURNABY CHALLENGER LEAGUE (0.85) — Both are 'Challenger League' charities (adapted sports/recreation) but in different cities: Montreal vs. Burnaby. Same brand/network but distinct legal entities in different provinces. No shared BN. Likely regional affiliates.
related entity
SOUTH DELTA CHALLENGER LEAGUE (0.85) — Both are regional chapters of the Challenger League (inclusive sports for disabled youth) but serve different cities: Montreal vs. South Delta (BC). Same program brand, different legal entities in different provinces.
related entity
DES LAURENTIDES CHALLENGER LEAGUE (0.82) — Both are regional chapters of the Challenger League program (disability sports) but serve different geographic areas: Montreal vs. Des Laurentides. No shared BN root. Same program brand, different legal entities => RELATED.
related entity
PARKLAND CHALLENGER LEAGUE (0.82) — Both are regional chapters of the Challenger League (baseball for people with disabilities) — Montreal vs Parkland. Same program type but different geographic locations, likely affiliated chapters under a national umbrella, not the same leg
related entity
CORRIDOR CHALLENGER LEAGUE (0.72) — Both are 'Challenger League' sports organizations in Quebec but with different geographic identifiers (Montreal vs. Corridor region). Likely affiliated regional chapters of the same league network, not the same legal entity.
recipient · MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL COUNCIL FUNDRAISING SOCIETY
The dataset shows MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL COUNCIL FUNDRAISING SOCIETY (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL; MOTHER TERESA HIGH SCHOOL; MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC.; MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC.; FRIENDS OF MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL SOCIETY OF SYLVAN LAKE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.792
related entity
MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL (0.85) — The Fundraising Society is a separate legal entity formed to support Mother Teresa School, not the school itself. Parent/affiliate relationship: school council fundraising body vs. the school as grant recipient.
related entity
MOTHER TERESA HIGH SCHOOL (0.82) — Entity A is Mother Teresa High School (a CRA charity/school), Entity B is its associated school council fundraising society (a separate non-profit). Same school name basis but distinct legal organisations with different purposes.
related entity
MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC. (0.82) — A is Mother Teresa Middle School Inc. (CRA charity, BN 821193604, Regina SK). B is a separate Alberta non-profit fundraising society associated with a Mother Teresa School council. Different legal entities, different provinces, different BN
related entity
MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC. (0.82) — Entity A is a registered CRA charity (the school itself, BN 821193804). Entity B is a separate fundraising society for the school council — a distinct legal body supporting the same school but not the same organisation.
related entity
FRIENDS OF MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL SOCIETY OF SYLVAN LAKE (0.72) — Both relate to Mother Teresa School in Sylvan Lake but are distinct societies: A is a 'Friends of School' society, B is a 'School Council Fundraising Society'. Different legal names, no shared BN, likely separate registered organizations wi
recipient · MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL PARENT COUNCIL ASSOCIATION
The dataset shows MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL PARENT COUNCIL ASSOCIATION (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — MOTHER TERESA HIGH SCHOOL; MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC.; MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC.; MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL; FRIENDS OF MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL SOCIETY OF SYLVAN LAKE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.787
related entity
MOTHER TERESA HIGH SCHOOL (0.82) — Entity A is a Catholic high school (CRA charity); Entity B is its parent council association (AB non-profit). Same school name but different legal organizations — parent council is an affiliated body, not the school itself.
related entity
MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC. (0.82) — Entity A is the incorporated school (CRA charity, BN 821193604, Regina SK). Entity B is the parent council association for a school of similar name (Alberta, no BN). Separate legal entities; parent council is an affiliate/associated body, n
related entity
MOTHER TERESA MIDDLE SCHOOL INC. (0.82) — Both relate to Mother Teresa School but are distinct legal entities: A is the school itself (CRA charity, BN 821193804); B is the parent council association (AB non-profit, no BN). Parent council is affiliated but not the same org.
related entity
MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL (0.82) — Entity A is the parent council association (non-profit body of parents) for Entity B, a school. They share the 'Mother Teresa School' name but are legally distinct organisations — one is the school, the other its parent council.
related entity
FRIENDS OF MOTHER TERESA SCHOOL SOCIETY OF SYLVAN LAKE (0.72) — Both are non-profits linked to Mother Teresa School in Sylvan Lake area, but one is a 'Friends of School Society' and the other a 'Parent Council Association' — distinct organizations with different mandates and legal identities.
The dataset shows MST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — CHINIKI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; COAST SALISH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; NCH'KAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; NUPQU DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; VIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.703
related entity
CHINIKI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.72) — MST Development Corporation represents the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations joint venture; Chiniki Development Corporation serves the Chiniki First Nation. Both are Indigenous development corporations but distinct legal entiti
related entity
COAST SALISH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.72) — MST Development Corporation is the joint venture entity of Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh nations; Coast Salish Development Corporation is a related but distinct entity. Both operate in Coast Salish territory but are separate legal
related entity
NCH'KAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.72) — MST Development Corporation and Nch'Kay Development Corporation are both Indigenous economic development corporations associated with the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh (MST) partnership, but they are distinct legal entities with di
related entity
NUPQU DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.72) — Both are 'Development Corporations' likely tied to the MST (Musqueam, Squamish, Tsleil-Waututh) partnership; Nupqu is a Ktunaxa entity. Different BN roots, different Indigenous groups, likely affiliates not same legal entity.
related entity
VIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (0.72) — VIVE Development Corporation and MST Development Corporation share 'Development Corporation' suffix and similar federal grants activity, suggesting possible affiliation (e.g. MST Nations joint venture), but different names and no shared BN
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING - SOUTHERN ALBERTA
medium
recipient · NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING - SOUTHERN ALBERTA
The dataset shows NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING - SOUTHERN ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING/NATIONAL CAPITAL; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING ONTARIO; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING -- VANCOUVER CHAPTER; National Association of Teachers of Singing - Alberta North Chapter; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING, ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.885
related entity
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING/NATIONAL CAPITAL (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of the same national association (NATS) but represent different geographic regions: National Capital vs. Southern Alberta. Different BN roots, different provinces — regional chapters are RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING ONTARIO (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of the same national organization (NATS) but represent different provinces: Ontario vs. Southern Alberta. Different BN roots (A has BN, B has none). Regional chapters are RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING -- VANCOUVER CHAPTER (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of NATS but in different cities/provinces (Vancouver vs. Southern Alberta). Different BN roots (A has BN, B has none). Same parent association, different legal entities — chapter vs. chapter = RELATED.
related entity
National Association of Teachers of Singing - Alberta North Chapter (0.88) — Both are regional Alberta chapters of the National Association of Teachers of Singing but cover different geographic areas (Southern Alberta vs. North Central Alberta), making them distinct affiliated chapters of the same national body.
related entity
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF SINGING, ALBERTA (0.85) — Entity A is the Alberta-wide chapter of NATS; Entity B is specifically the Southern Alberta chapter. Both are regional affiliates of the same national org but represent distinct geographic chapters, not the same legal entity.
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN-CANADIANS, CALGARY DISTRICT
medium
recipient · NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN-CANADIANS, CALGARY DISTRICT
The dataset shows NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN-CANADIANS, CALGARY DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - EDMONTON DISTRICT; NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - EDMONTON DISTRICT - CHARITABLE FOUNDATION; NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - TORONTO; NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS; CALGARY ITALIAN CULTURAL CENTRE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.842
related entity
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - EDMONTON DISTRICT (0.92) — Both are district chapters of the National Congress of Italian Canadians but serve different cities (Edmonton vs Calgary). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - EDMONTON DISTRICT - CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (0.92) — Both are district-level chapters of the National Congress of Italian Canadians but in different cities (Edmonton vs Calgary) and one is a charitable foundation. Different local entities under the same national umbrella => RELATED.
related entity
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS - TORONTO (0.92) — Both are district/chapter entities of the National Congress of Italian Canadians but in different cities (Toronto vs Calgary). Same umbrella organization, different regional chapters => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF ITALIAN CANADIANS (0.82) — Calgary District chapter shares the national congress name but is a distinct regional entity with no BN, different city, and separate Alberta non-profit registration. National vs. regional chapter => RELATED, not SAME.
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, CALGARY SECTION
medium
recipient · NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, CALGARY SECTION
The dataset shows NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, CALGARY SECTION (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.94) — NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA - EDMONTON SECTION; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, VANCOUVER SECTION; THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, TORONTO SECTION; THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA- WINNIPEG SECTION INC.; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.94
related entity
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA - EDMONTON SECTION (0.95) — Both are sections of the same national organisation but serve different cities (Edmonton vs Calgary). Different city sections are distinct legal entities per rules. No shared BN root. RELATED as regional chapters of National Council of Jewi
related entity
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, VANCOUVER SECTION (0.95) — Both are sections of the same national organisation (NCJW of Canada) but represent different cities: Vancouver (BN 107761744) vs. Calgary (no BN). Different regional chapters => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA, TORONTO SECTION (0.95) — Both are sections of the National Council of Jewish Women of Canada but in different cities (Toronto vs Calgary). Different BN roots (A has 107761736, B has none). Regional chapters of same national org => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA- WINNIPEG SECTION INC. (0.95) — Both are sections of the same national Jewish women's organization but represent different cities (Winnipeg vs. Calgary). Different BN roots (A has CRA BN, B has none). Regional chapters of same parent body => RELATED, not SAME.
NATION HURONNE-WENDAT, DIRECTION DU CDFM HURON-WENDAT
medium
recipient · NATION HURONNE-WENDAT, DIRECTION DU CDFM HURON-WENDAT
The dataset shows NATION HURONNE-WENDAT, DIRECTION DU CDFM HURON-WENDAT (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — Conseil de la Nation Huronne-Wendat; MUSÉE HURON-WENDAT; NATION HURONNE-WENDAT; Conseil de la Nation Wendat; Corporation du Musée de la Nation Wendat; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.79
related entity
Conseil de la Nation Huronne-Wendat (0.82) — Entity B is a specific directorate (CDFM Huron-Wendat) within the Huron-Wendat Nation, not the governing council itself. No shared BN. Likely a sub-unit or department, making them RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
MUSÉE HURON-WENDAT (0.82) — Both are part of the Huron-Wendat Nation but are distinct entities: A is the Musée Huron-Wendat (a museum), B is the Nation huronne-wendat's CDFM direction (a community development/training body). Same nation, different organizational units
related entity
NATION HURONNE-WENDAT (0.82) — B is a specific directorate (CDFM Huron-Wendat) within Nation Huronne-Wendat, not the same legal entity. It is a sub-unit/department of A, making them RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
Conseil de la Nation Wendat (0.78) — Both relate to the Huron-Wendat Nation but Entity A is the governing council (Conseil de la Nation Wendat) while Entity B is a specific directorate/department (CDFM - Centre de formation). These are parent/sub-unit, not the same legal entit
related entity
Corporation du Musée de la Nation Wendat (0.78) — Entity B is a directional unit (CDFM huron-wendat) of Nation Huronne-Wendat, not the museum corporation. No shared BN. B appears to be an administrative arm of the Nation, while A is a distinct chartered charitable museum corporation.
The dataset shows Newman Navy League Cadet Corps (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY LEAGUE CADETS; THE NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA (HALIFAX BRANCH); CALGARY BRANCH, NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA; NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA NL DIVISION; NAVY LEAGUE OF ONTARIO FOUNDATION; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.83
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY LEAGUE CADETS (0.85) — Both are Navy League Cadet corps under the Navy League of Canada, but 'Newman' identifies a specific local corps while Entity A appears to be a generic/national body. Same program family, different local chapters — RELATED.
related entity
THE NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA (HALIFAX BRANCH) (0.85) — Entity A is the Halifax Branch of Navy League of Canada (registered charity, BN 808353809). Entity B is a specific Navy League Cadet Corps unit (Newman). Same national body affiliation but different legal entities: branch vs. cadet corps.
related entity
CALGARY BRANCH, NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA (0.82) — Both relate to Navy League of Canada in Calgary context, but Entity A is the Calgary Branch (registered charity BN 891181349) while Entity B is a Newman Navy League Cadet Corps unit — a corps sponsored by the branch, not the same legal enti
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA NL DIVISION (0.82) — Entity A is the Navy League of Canada NL (Newfoundland) Division, a regional chapter. Entity B is Newman Navy League Cadets, a local cadet corps affiliated with the Navy League. Different BN roots, different levels of organisation; chapter
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF ONTARIO FOUNDATION (0.82) — Navy League of Ontario Foundation (public foundation, BN 888447273) likely funds or supports Navy League cadet corps units like Newman Navy League Cadets, but they are distinct legal entities with different BN roots and roles.
recipient · NL & LAB ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING
The dataset shows NL & LAB ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.76) — Association for Community Living; STRAITS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING; HOPE ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING; 81351 NL & LAB INC; ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY LIVING; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.763
related entity
Association for Community Living (0.82) — Entity B is explicitly the Newfoundland & Labrador provincial chapter; Entity A lacks geographic qualifier and likely refers to a different regional or national body. Same movement, but distinct legal organisations — regional chapter vs. ot
related entity
STRAITS ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (0.82) — Both are Associations for Community Living in NL/Labrador but Entity A is a regional/local chapter (Strait of Belle Isle area) while Entity B appears to be the provincial association. Regional chapter vs. provincial body => RELATED.
related entity
HOPE ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING (0.78) — Entity A is a local/regional charity (BN: 118962489) named 'Hope Association for Community Living'; Entity B is 'NL & Lab Association for Community Living', a provincial-level body in Newfoundland & Labrador. Both are in the community livin
related entity
81351 NL & LAB INC (0.72) — Entity A is '81351 NL & Lab Inc' (a numbered company, BN 764743688). Entity B is 'NL & Lab Association for Community Living' (no BN, association). Likely related—numbered co may be a chapter/affiliate of the association—but distinct legal e
related entity
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY LIVING (0.72) — Entity B specifies a Newfoundland & Labrador provincial chapter; Entity A is generic/unspecified. Likely regional affiliate vs. national or another provincial body. No BNs to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
The dataset shows Northern News Services Limited (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.78) — NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - DEH CHO DRUM; NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - INUVIK DRUM; NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - NUNAVUT NEWS NORTH; NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - KIVALLIQ NEWS; NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - NEWS NORTH NWT/YK; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 10 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.775
related entity
NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - DEH CHO DRUM (0.82) — Entity B is a specific publication/division (Deh Cho Drum) operated by the same parent legal entity (Northern News Services Limited). Division/trade-name of parent, but listed distinctly in grants data, so RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - INUVIK DRUM (0.82) — Entity B 'NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - INUVIK DRUM' is a named publication/division of Entity A, the parent legal entity. 'Inuvik Drum' is a specific newspaper title operated by Northern News Services Limited, making them parent/divisio
related entity
NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - NUNAVUT NEWS NORTH (0.82) — Entity B is a named publication/division (Nunavut News North) of Entity A (Northern News Services Limited). The suffix indicates a specific newspaper title operated by the parent company, making this a parent-division relationship, not a si
related entity
NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - KIVALLIQ NEWS (0.75) — Entity B appears to be a specific publication/division (Kivalliq News) of Entity A (Northern News Services Limited). This is a parent-division relationship, not the same legal entity, so RELATED is preferred over SAME.
related entity
NORTHERN NEWS SERVICES LIMITED - NEWS NORTH NWT/YK (0.72) — Entity B appears to be a specific publication/division (News North NWT/YK) of the legal entity Northern News Services Limited (Entity A). The suffix denotes a named product/regional outlet, suggesting division-level relationship rather than
The dataset shows NORTH STAR LODGE 7-063 SONS OF NORWAY (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — EIDSVOLD LODGE 7-003 SONS OF NORWAY; SONS OF NORWAY FOUNDATION IN CANADA; SONS OF NORWAY LEIF ERIKSON LODGE FUND; VIKING LODGE 7-0871 SONS OF NORWAY; POLARSTJERNA LODGE NO. 394 SONS OF NORWAY; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.84
related entity
EIDSVOLD LODGE 7-003 SONS OF NORWAY (0.92) — Both are distinct local lodges of Sons of Norway (different lodge numbers: 7-063 vs 7-003, different lodge names). They are sibling chapters under the same fraternal organization, not the same legal entity.
related entity
SONS OF NORWAY FOUNDATION IN CANADA (0.85) — Entity A is the national foundation (Sons of Norway Foundation in Canada, BN 892070640). Entity B is a local lodge chapter (North Star Lodge 7-063). Same fraternal organization family but distinct legal entities: national foundation vs. reg
related entity
SONS OF NORWAY LEIF ERIKSON LODGE FUND (0.85) — Both are Sons of Norway lodges but different chapters: 'North Star Lodge 7-063' vs 'Leif Erikson Lodge Fund' — distinct lodge names indicate separate local chapters/funds, not the same legal entity.
related entity
VIKING LODGE 7-0871 SONS OF NORWAY (0.85) — Both are distinct local lodges of Sons of Norway (a fraternal organization) with different lodge names and numbers (7-063 vs 7-0871). Same parent organization but separate legal chapters, not the same entity.
related entity
POLARSTJERNA LODGE NO. 394 SONS OF NORWAY (0.82) — Both are local lodges of Sons of Norway fraternal organization but have different lodge names, numbers (7-063 vs 394), and different datasets (CRA charity vs AB non-profit). They are sibling chapters, not the same entity.
NORTH-WEST CANADIAN COUNCIL B'NAI B'RITH CAMP SERVICE LEAGUE
medium
recipient · NORTH-WEST CANADIAN COUNCIL B'NAI B'RITH CAMP SERVICE LEAGUE
The dataset shows NORTH-WEST CANADIAN COUNCIL B'NAI B'RITH CAMP SERVICE LEAGUE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.75) — B'NAI B'RITH JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMP INC.; Camp B'nai B'rith of Ottawa Incorporated; B'NAI B'RITH FOUNDATION OF MOUNT ROYAL LODGE; B'nai B'rith Youth Organization of Canada; Camp B'nai Brith Inc.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.753
related entity
B'NAI B'RITH JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMP INC. (0.82) — Both are B'nai B'rith camp-related orgs but distinct legal entities: A is B'nai B'rith Jewish Community Camp Inc (BN 123703209, CRA charity); B is a North-West Canadian Council camp service league (no BN, AB non-profit). Likely affiliated/s
related entity
Camp B'nai B'rith of Ottawa Incorporated (0.82) — Both are B'nai B'rith camp-related orgs but distinct legal entities: A is Ottawa-based charity with CRA BN; B is a North-West Canadian Council camp service league in Alberta with no BN. Different regions, different legal names, no shared BN
related entity
B'NAI B'RITH FOUNDATION OF MOUNT ROYAL LODGE (0.72) — Both are B'nai B'rith affiliated organizations but serve different purposes: A is a charitable foundation for a specific lodge (Mount Royal), B is a camp service league for the North-West Canadian Council. Different legal entities, differen
related entity
B'nai B'rith Youth Organization of Canada (0.72) — Both share B'nai B'rith branding but are distinct legal entities: A is the national youth org (CRA registered, BN root 130907819); B is a regional Alberta camp service league with no BN. Different scope, category, and jurisdiction.
related entity
Camp B'nai Brith Inc. (0.72) — Both relate to B'nai Brith camp operations but are distinct legal entities: A is a registered CRA charity (BN 889794379), B is a North-West Canadian Council camp service league with no BN. Likely regional affiliate/predecessor, not the same
recipient · Northwest Territories Department of Justice
The dataset shows Northwest Territories Department of Justice (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — Government of the Northwest Territories; NORTHWEST TERRITORIES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COURT SERVICES | MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE DES TERRITOIRES DU NORD-OUEST, SERVICES DES TRIBUNAUX; DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF NORTH WEST TERRITORIES; Government of Northwest Territories, Department of Justice, Community Justice Division; GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES FLMM SECRETARIAT; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 19 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.83
related entity
Government of the Northwest Territories (0.85) — GNWT Department of Justice is a department/ministry of the Government of Northwest Territories (Entity A), not a separate legal entity. Departments are sub-units, not the same legal organisation. Prefer RELATED (parent/subsidiary).
related entity
NORTHWEST TERRITORIES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COURT SERVICES | MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE DES TERRITOIRES DU NORD-OUEST, SERVICES DES TRIBUNAUX (0.85) — Entity B is 'Court Services', a specific division/branch of the NWT Dept of Justice (Entity A). It is a sub-unit, not the same legal entity. Parent-subsidiary/division relationship applies.
related entity
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF NORTH WEST TERRITORIES (0.82) — Both are departments of the Government of Northwest Territories but serve different mandates: Justice vs. Environmental & Natural Resources. Same territorial government parent, but distinct legal/administrative departments — RELATED not SAM
related entity
Government of Northwest Territories, Department of Justice, Community Justice Division (0.82) — Entity A is the Community Justice Division subdivision of Entity B (NWT Dept of Justice). A is a specific program division, B is the parent department. Division vs. department = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
GOVERNMENT OF NORTHWEST TERRITORIES FLMM SECRETARIAT (0.82) — Entity A is the NWT Dept of Justice (federal grants recipient). Entity B is the NWT FLMM Secretariat (Forum of Labour Market Ministers), a different departmental unit of the same territorial government. Same parent government, different fun
Okotoks Lodge No. 31 of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada
medium
recipient · Okotoks Lodge No. 31 of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada
The dataset shows Okotoks Lodge No. 31 of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.94) — Echo Bay Elks Lodge No. 535 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of Canada, Incorporated; THE BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF CANADA, LODGE NO. 117,; The Grand Lodge of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the Dominion of Canada; BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS HANNA LODGE NO 451; BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS LAC LA BICHE LODGE NO 470; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 7 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.935
related entity
Echo Bay Elks Lodge No. 535 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of Canada, Incorporated (0.95) — Both are local lodges of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada but are distinct chapters: Echo Bay Lodge No. 535 (BN 132707498, fed) vs. Okotoks Lodge No. 31 (no BN, ab). Different lodge numbers, cities, and BN roots confirm
related entity
THE BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF CANADA, LODGE NO. 117, (0.95) — Both are local lodges of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada, but different lodge numbers (117 vs. 31) and different locations, making them distinct chapters of the same fraternal organization.
related entity
The Grand Lodge of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the Dominion of Canada (0.95) — Entity A is Okotoks Lodge No. 31, a local chapter of the Elks of Canada. Entity B is the Grand Lodge, the national governing body. Same fraternal order but different legal entities: local chapter vs. national parent organization.
related entity
BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS HANNA LODGE NO 451 (0.92) — Both are local lodges of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada, but different numbered lodges in different cities (Okotoks Lodge 31 vs Hanna Lodge 451). Same fraternal order, different legal chapters.
related entity
BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS LAC LA BICHE LODGE NO 470 (0.92) — Both are local lodges of the same fraternal order (Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of Canada) but are distinct chapters in different cities (Okotoks Lodge No.31 vs. Lac La Biche Lodge No.470). Different lodge numbers and locations =
recipient · OLSON, MATTHEW (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS)
The dataset shows OLSON, MATTHEW (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — PATCH, JACOB (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); BÉRARD, FLORENCE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); HUGHES, KEVIN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); TREMBLAY, PHILIPPE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); BELANGER, NICOLE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.802
related entity
PATCH, JACOB (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records represent different individuals (Olson Matthew vs Patch Jacob) affiliated with the same company Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. Same org, different persons — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
BÉRARD, FLORENCE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.82) — Both records represent different individuals (Florence Bérard, Matthew Olson) affiliated with the same company Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. They are related via that employer but are distinct grant recipient entries, not the same legal
related entity
HUGHES, KEVIN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.82) — Both records reference Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions but represent different named individuals (Kevin Hughes vs. Matthew Olson). Same parent company, different persons/contacts. RELATED as affiliates of the same organisation, not the sam
related entity
TREMBLAY, PHILIPPE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.82) — Both records share 'Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions' as the employer/organization, but represent different named individuals (Olson, Matthew vs Tremblay, Philippe). Same company, different grant recipients/contacts — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
BELANGER, NICOLE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.75) — Both records share 'Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions' as the parent organization but represent different named individuals (Nicole Belanger vs. Matthew Olson). These are different grant recipient entries under the same company, not the same
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Crown Law Office
medium
recipient · Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Crown Law Office
The dataset shows Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Crown Law Office (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.87) — Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Indigenous Justice Division; MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO - OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF FRENCH LANGUAGE; ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION | MINISTÈRE DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DE L’ONTARIO, DIVISION DES SERVICES JUDICIAIRES; Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division; ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION, CIVIL, FAMILY POLICY AND PROGRAMS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.872
related entity
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Indigenous Justice Division (0.92) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but are distinct organizational units: Indigenous Justice Division vs Crown Law Office. Same parent ministry, different sub-units. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO - OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF FRENCH LANGUAGE (0.88) — Both are offices within Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but serve distinct functions: Crown Law Office (legal counsel) vs. Office of the Coordinator of French Language Services. Same parent ministry, different sub-units => RELATED.
related entity
ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION | MINISTÈRE DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DE L’ONTARIO, DIVISION DES SERVICES JUDICIAIRES (0.88) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of Attorney General but distinct units: Entity A is Crown Law Office (civil/criminal litigation), Entity B is Court Services Division (court administration). Same parent ministry, different functional
related entity
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division (0.88) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but represent distinct organizational units: Crown Law Office (legal counsel) vs. Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division (victim services). Same parent ministry, different divi
related entity
ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION, CIVIL, FAMILY POLICY AND PROGRAMS (0.85) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of Attorney General but distinct units: A is Crown Law Office (litigation/legal counsel), B is Court Services Division Civil/Family Policy & Programs. Same parent ministry, different operational divisi
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Indigenous Justice Division
medium
recipient · Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Indigenous Justice Division
The dataset shows Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Indigenous Justice Division (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Crown Law Office; Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division; ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION | MINISTÈRE DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DE L’ONTARIO, DIVISION DES SERVICES JUDICIAIRES; MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO - OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF FRENCH LANGUAGE; ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION, CIVIL, FAMILY POLICY AND PROGRAMS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.878
related entity
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Crown Law Office (0.92) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but are distinct organizational units: Indigenous Justice Division vs Crown Law Office. Same parent ministry, different sub-units. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division (0.92) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but serve distinct mandates: Indigenous Justice Division vs. Victims and Vulnerable Persons Division. Same parent ministry, different operational units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION | MINISTÈRE DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DE L’ONTARIO, DIVISION DES SERVICES JUDICIAIRES (0.88) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but distinct divisions: Indigenous Justice Division vs. Court Services Division. Same parent ministry, different operational units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO - OFFICE OF THE COORDINATOR OF FRENCH LANGUAGE (0.85) — Both are divisions/offices of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General but serve distinct functions: Indigenous Justice Division vs. Office of the Coordinator of French Language. Same parent ministry, different operational units — RELATED n
ORDER OF AHEPA, AURORA BOREALIS CHAPTER NO. C.J.10
medium
recipient · ORDER OF AHEPA, AURORA BOREALIS CHAPTER NO. C.J.10
The dataset shows ORDER OF AHEPA, AURORA BOREALIS CHAPTER NO. C.J.10 (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — CANADIAN ORDER OF AHEPA; GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA; GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT NO 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA; GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT NO. 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA - CHARITABLE FOUNDATION; OMIROU OTHISTA CHAPTER CJII, OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.797
related entity
CANADIAN ORDER OF AHEPA (0.85) — Entity A is the national Canadian Order of AHEPA (CRA charity). Entity B is a specific local chapter (Aurora Borealis Chapter No. C.J.10) registered in Alberta. Chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA (0.82) — Both are AHEPA-affiliated organizations but distinct legal entities: A is a CRA-registered district body (District 26, Golden West) with BN 890119924; B is a specific Alberta chapter (Aurora Borealis C.J.10). Regional chapter vs. district b
related entity
GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT NO 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA (0.82) — Both belong to the Order of AHEPA fraternal organization but are distinct units: A is a CRA-registered district (No. 26), B is a local chapter (Aurora Borealis C.J.10) with no BN. Different BNs, different levels of the hierarchy.
related entity
GOLDEN WEST DISTRICT NO. 26 OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA - CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (0.82) — Both are Order of AHEPA affiliates but legally distinct: A is the Golden West District No.26 charitable foundation (CRA-registered, BN 890199243); B is a separate local chapter (Aurora Borealis No. C.J.10) with no BN. Regional chapter vs. d
recipient · PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION
The dataset shows PADDLE PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; PADDLE PRAIRIE FARM CORPORATION; Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement; PADDLE PRAIRIE SETTLEMENT AND AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.703
related entity
LOCAL #141 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Entity A is a local chapter (#141) of the Metis Association of Alberta in Paddle Prairie; Entity B is the Paddle Prairie Metis Settlement Association — related by geography/community but distinct legal organisations with different mandates
related entity
LOCAL #601 (PADDLE PRAIRIE) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.72) — Both relate to Paddle Prairie Métis community but are distinct legal entities: A is a local chapter of the Métis Association of Alberta; B is the Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement Association, a separate governance body for the settlement.
related entity
PADDLE PRAIRIE FARM CORPORATION (0.72) — Both entities share 'Paddle Prairie' location and Métis settlement context. The Farm Corporation is likely an economic arm/affiliate of the Métis Settlement, but they are distinct legal entities with different names and types.
related entity
Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement (0.72) — Entity A is the Métis Settlement government body (BN 128552890, multi-dataset). Entity B is a separately registered non-profit 'Association' with no BN, only in ab_non_profit. Likely a community association affiliated with but distinct from
related entity
PADDLE PRAIRIE SETTLEMENT AND AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY (0.72) — Both are Paddle Prairie Métis Settlement organizations but have distinct legal names and purposes: one is a settlement/agriculture development society, the other a Métis settlement association. Likely related community bodies, not the same
The dataset shows PANAGO PIZZA STORE 129 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — PANAGO PIZZA 107; PANAGO PIZZA 116; PANAGO PIZZA #96; PANAGO PIZZA; PANAGO PIZZA ELLERSLIE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.795
related entity
PANAGO PIZZA 107 (0.85) — Both are Panago Pizza franchise locations (store 107 vs store 129) — distinct legal franchise entities sharing brand. Same brand/franchisor but different store numbers indicate separate operating entities. RELATED as affiliates under Panago
related entity
PANAGO PIZZA 116 (0.85) — Both are distinct Panago Pizza franchise locations identified by different store numbers (116 vs 129). Same brand/franchisor but separate legal franchise entities. RELATED as affiliates under the Panago Pizza franchise network.
related entity
PANAGO PIZZA #96 (0.85) — Both are Panago Pizza franchise locations but different store numbers (#96 vs #129), indicating distinct franchise outlets/legal entities operating under the same brand. Same brand, different locations => RELATED.
related entity
PANAGO PIZZA (0.75) — Entity B is a specific numbered franchise store (Store 129) of the Panago Pizza brand, while Entity A appears to be the broader brand/franchisor. Specific store vs. parent brand relationship suggests RELATED, not SAME legal entity.
related entity
PANAGO PIZZA ELLERSLIE (0.75) — Both are Panago Pizza franchise locations in Alberta, likely different stores (Ellerslie location vs. Store 129). Same brand/franchisor but distinct legal operating entities unless proven identical. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
recipient · PATCH, JACOB (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS)
The dataset shows PATCH, JACOB (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — ABRAHAM, RYAN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); HARTIGAN, BRIAN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); HUGHES, KEVIN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); OLSON, MATTHEW (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); TREMBLAY, PHILIPPE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.833
related entity
ABRAHAM, RYAN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records share 'Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions' as the parent org but represent different individuals (Abraham, Ryan vs Patch, Jacob). These are different grant recipients/contacts at the same company, not the same legal entity.
related entity
HARTIGAN, BRIAN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records represent different individuals (Hartigan, Brian and Patch, Jacob) affiliated with the same company Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. They share the parent org but are distinct grant recipient entries, not the same legal entity
related entity
HUGHES, KEVIN (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records share 'Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions' but represent different individuals (Kevin Hughes vs Jacob Patch) within that company. They are related via the same parent organization but are distinct grant recipient records.
related entity
OLSON, MATTHEW (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records represent different individuals (Olson Matthew vs Patch Jacob) affiliated with the same company Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. Same org, different persons — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TREMBLAY, PHILIPPE (CURTISS-WRIGHT DEFENSE SOLUTIONS) (0.85) — Both records represent different individuals (Patch, Jacob and Tremblay, Philippe) employed by the same organisation, Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. They share the same parent company but are distinct grant recipient entries, not the sam
The dataset shows PHO HOAN PASTEUR (WEST LINK PARK) LTD (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — PHO HOAN PASTEUR MAHOGANY LTD.; PHO HOAN PASTEUR (MAINSTREET) LTD.; PHO HOAN PASTEUR ROYAL OAK LTD.; PHO HOAN PASTEUR SAGE HILL LTD.; PHO HOAN PASTEUR (HEARTLAND COMMON) LTD.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.823
related entity
PHO HOAN PASTEUR MAHOGANY LTD. (0.85) — Both share 'Pho Hoan Pasteur' brand but are distinct legal entities at different locations: West Link Park and Mahogany. Likely same owner/franchise group but separate incorporated companies. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
PHO HOAN PASTEUR (MAINSTREET) LTD. (0.85) — Both share the 'Pho Hoan Pasteur' brand but are distinct legal entities: one operates at West Link Park, the other at Mainstreet. Likely same ownership/franchise group but separate incorporated companies — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
PHO HOAN PASTEUR ROYAL OAK LTD. (0.85) — Both share 'Pho Hoan Pasteur' brand but are distinct legal entities: one at West Link Park, one at Royal Oak — different locations, different Ltd. companies, likely same owner/franchise but separate legal registrations.
related entity
PHO HOAN PASTEUR SAGE HILL LTD. (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Pho Hoan Pasteur brand but at different locations (West Link Park vs Sage Hill). Same brand/operator but separate incorporated companies. No shared BN. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
PHO HOAN PASTEUR (HEARTLAND COMMON) LTD. (0.82) — Both share 'Pho Hoan Pasteur' brand but are distinct legal entities with different location identifiers (West Link Park vs Heartland Common), indicating separate franchise/branch corporations, not the same legal entity.
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (EDMONTON BRANCH)
medium
recipient · PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (EDMONTON BRANCH)
The dataset shows PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (EDMONTON BRANCH) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA(1978)/ASSOCIATION DE LA JEUNESSE UKRAINIENNE DE CANADA PLAST (1978); ASSOCIATION DE LA JEUNESSE UKRAINIENNE PLAST DU QUEBEC/PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF QUEBEC; PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBA; PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO, TORONTO BRANCH; FRIENDS OF PLAST EDMONTON SOCIETY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA(1978)/ASSOCIATION DE LA JEUNESSE UKRAINIENNE DE CANADA PLAST (1978) (0.88) — Entity A is the national CRA-registered charity (BN 888546447); Entity B is the Edmonton Branch chapter — a regional affiliate/subsidiary, not the same legal entity. No shared BN. Per rules, national vs. regional chapter => RELATED.
related entity
ASSOCIATION DE LA JEUNESSE UKRAINIENNE PLAST DU QUEBEC/PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF QUEBEC (0.85) — Both are Plast Ukrainian Youth Association branches but distinct legal entities: A is Quebec chapter (CRA charity, BN 118792613), B is Edmonton/Canada branch (Alberta non-profit, no BN). Same movement, different regional chapters.
related entity
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBA (0.85) — Both are Plast Ukrainian Youth Association branches but different legal entities: A is the Manitoba chapter (CRA BN 119094597), B is the Edmonton/Alberta branch with no BN. Different provinces, different registrations => RELATED chapters of
related entity
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO, TORONTO BRANCH (0.85) — Both are Plast Ukrainian Youth Association branches but different jurisdictions (Ontario/Toronto vs Canada/Edmonton) and different BN roots (A has BN, B has none). Regional chapters of same organization => RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows POINTS WEST LIVING SLAVE LAKE INC. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.91) — POINTS WEST LIVING COCHRANE INC.; POINTS WEST LIVING DRAYTON VALLEY LTD.; POINTS WEST LIVING LAC LA BICHE INC.; POINTS WEST LIVING LLOYDMINSTER INC.; POINTS WEST LIVING RED DEER INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.908
related entity
POINTS WEST LIVING COCHRANE INC. (0.92) — Both are 'Points West Living' branded seniors care facilities but in different cities (Cochrane vs Slave Lake), likely separate legal entities under a common brand/parent. Different cities => RELATED not SAME.
related entity
POINTS WEST LIVING DRAYTON VALLEY LTD. (0.92) — Both share 'Points West Living' brand but serve different locations (Drayton Valley vs Slave Lake), have different legal suffixes (Ltd vs Inc), different BN roots, and different datasets. Likely affiliated under same operator group but dist
related entity
POINTS WEST LIVING LAC LA BICHE INC. (0.92) — Both are 'Points West Living' branded long-term care facilities but incorporated separately for different cities (Lac La Biche vs Slave Lake). Same brand/operator family but distinct legal entities by location — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
POINTS WEST LIVING LLOYDMINSTER INC. (0.92) — Both share 'Points West Living' brand but are distinct legal entities in different cities (Lloydminster vs Slave Lake), different BN roots, different datasets. Likely affiliates under same corporate family.
related entity
POINTS WEST LIVING RED DEER INC. (0.92) — Both share 'Points West Living' brand but serve different cities (Red Deer vs Slave Lake) and have no shared BN root. Likely affiliated entities under the same corporate family, not the same legal organization.
recipient · POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #4
The dataset shows POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #4 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #13; Polish Combatants' Association in Canada Inc., Branch No. 2 London; THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION; POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO; POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.878
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #13 (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association but different numbered chapters (#13 vs #4). Same parent organization, different local branches. Different BN roots confirm separate legal entities. RELATED as regional chapters of a na
related entity
Polish Combatants' Association in Canada Inc., Branch No. 2 London (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association but different numbered chapters (#2 vs #4). Regional branches of the same parent organization are RELATED, not SAME. Different BN roots (A has one, B has none) confirms separate legal e
related entity
THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION (0.88) — Entity A is the charitable foundation of the Polish Combatants Association (CRA registered, BN 896007572). Entity B is a local branch (#4) of the Polish Combatants Association — a regional chapter, not the foundation. Different legal entiti
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO (0.85) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association but different numbered branches (#20 Toronto vs #4). Same national organization, different local chapters. No shared BN root. RELATED as regional affiliates, not SAME legal entity.
POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6
medium
recipient · POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6
The dataset shows POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6 (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.90) — POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO; THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION; THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION BRANCH 22 COLEMAN ALTA; THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, BRANCH 8, OTTAWA FOUNDATION; POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION IN CANADA INC BRANCH NO 20 CUL; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 7 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.902
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION BRANCH #20 TORONTO (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association in Canada but in different cities (Toronto Branch #20 vs Edmonton Branch #6) with no shared BN. Same national parent organization, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION (0.92) — Entity A is a national charitable foundation (CRA-registered, BN 896007572) affiliated with the Polish Combatants Association. Entity B is a local Edmonton branch (no BN). Different legal entities: foundation vs. regional chapter.
related entity
THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION BRANCH 22 COLEMAN ALTA (0.92) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants' Association in Canada but different local chapters: Entity A is Edmonton Branch No. 6, Entity B is Branch 22 in Coleman, Alta. Different locations/branch numbers = distinct legal entities, hence R
related entity
THE POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, BRANCH 8, OTTAWA FOUNDATION (0.92) — Both are branches of the same national Polish Combatants' Association in Canada, but different branches in different cities (Ottawa Branch 8 vs. Edmonton Branch 6) with different BNs. Regional chapters of same parent org => RELATED.
recipient · POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - CLINTON NEWS RECORD
The dataset shows POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - CLINTON NEWS RECORD (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - NANTON NEWS (THE); POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - RECORD-GAZETTE; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - TILLSONBURG NEWS; Postmedia Network Inc.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 8 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.828
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION (0.85) — Both share 'Postmedia Network' branding but are distinct legal entities: A is a registered CRA charity (foundation, BN 805497005); B is an operating media outlet (Clinton News Record) under Postmedia Network Inc. Foundation vs. commercial s
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - NANTON NEWS (THE) (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publication divisions (Clinton News Record vs Nanton News). Same parent legal entity but distinct newspaper brands/locations. Parent vs. subsidiary/division relationship => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - RECORD-GAZETTE (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications (divisions/trade names) but represent distinct newspaper titles: Clinton News Record vs. Record-Gazette. Same parent legal entity, different operating units/publications. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - TILLSONBURG NEWS (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications (subsidiaries/divisions) but represent different local newspapers (Clinton News Record vs. Tillsonburg News) — same parent company, different operating units. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Postmedia Network Inc. (0.82) — Entity B is a specific publication (Clinton News Record) operated under Postmedia Network Inc., indicating a parent-to-division relationship rather than the same legal entity record.
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - COCHRANE TIMES-POST (THE)
medium
recipient · POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - COCHRANE TIMES-POST (THE)
The dataset shows POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - COCHRANE TIMES-POST (THE) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — Postmedia Network Inc. - The Ingersoll Times; POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - EXETER LAKESHORE TIMES-ADVANCE; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE TILBURY TIMES; Postmedia Network Inc.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 8 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.845
related entity
Postmedia Network Inc. - The Ingersoll Times (0.88) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications (divisions/titles) but represent different newspapers in different cities (Cochrane Times-Post vs. Ingersoll Times). Same parent legal entity, different operating units/titles => RELATED.
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION (0.85) — Both share 'Postmedia Network' brand but A is a registered charity (foundation, BN 805497005) and B is a federal grant recipient tied to a specific newspaper publication. Different legal entities; foundation vs. operating media subsidiary.
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - EXETER LAKESHORE TIMES-ADVANCE (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of the same parent legal entity Postmedia Network Inc., but represent distinct newspaper brands (Cochrane Times-Post vs. Exeter Lakeshore Times-Advance) in different cities. Same parent, different operating u
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE TILBURY TIMES (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications (same parent legal entity) but represent distinct newspaper titles—Cochrane Times-Post vs. Tilbury Times—different local papers, so RELATED as affiliates under same corporate parent.
related entity
Postmedia Network Inc. (0.82) — Entity B is a specific publication (Cochrane Times-Post) operated under Postmedia Network Inc. — a division/trade name, not the same legal entity record. Parent vs. operating unit => RELATED, not SAME.
recipient · POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE PINCHER CREEK ECHO
The dataset shows POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE PINCHER CREEK ECHO (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE WIARTON ECHO; POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - ONTARIO FARMER; POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE MITCHELL ADVOCATE; Postmedia Network Inc.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 8 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.852
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE WIARTON ECHO (0.92) — Both are distinct newspaper publications under Postmedia Network Inc. legal umbrella, but represent different titles (Pincher Creek Echo vs Wiarton Echo) in different cities. Same parent company, different operating units — RELATED not SAME
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK FOUNDATION (0.85) — Both share 'Postmedia Network' branding but are distinct: A is a registered charity (CRA, BN 805497005); B is a specific newspaper publication (Pincher Creek Echo) under Postmedia Network Inc., a commercial entity. Foundation vs. operating
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - ONTARIO FARMER (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications/divisions but represent distinct named publications (Ontario Farmer vs. Pincher Creek Echo). Same parent legal entity, different operating units/titles — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. - THE MITCHELL ADVOCATE (0.85) — Both are Postmedia Network Inc. publications (divisions/trade names) but represent distinct newspaper titles (Mitchell Advocate vs Pincher Creek Echo). Same parent legal entity, different operating units. RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Postmedia Network Inc. (0.82) — Entity B is Postmedia Network Inc. operating a specific publication (Pincher Creek Echo), likely a grant recipient in that capacity. Same legal parent but B represents a distinct operational/publication unit, not purely a DBA synonym.
PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND|PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND
medium
recipient · PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND|PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND
The dataset shows PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND|PRINCE ALBERT GRAND COUNCIL/LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — Lac La Ronge Indian Band; LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCY INC.; LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND - STANLEY MISSION BAND OFFICE; LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, STANLEY MISSION FIRST NATION; LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND EDUCATION; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.805
related entity
Lac La Ronge Indian Band (0.82) — Entity B is a joint grant recipient pairing Prince Albert Grand Council with Lac La Ronge Indian Band — a consortium entry, not the standalone Lac La Ronge Indian Band (Entity A). RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCY INC. (0.82) — Entity A is a distinct child & family services agency incorporated under Lac La Ronge Indian Band. Entity B is a joint grant recipient pairing Prince Albert Grand Council with Lac La Ronge Indian Band — a different legal entity/partnership,
related entity
LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND - STANLEY MISSION BAND OFFICE (0.82) — Entity A is a specific band office (Stanley Mission) of Lac La Ronge Indian Band. Entity B is a joint grant recipient pairing Prince Albert Grand Council with Lac La Ronge Indian Band. LLRIB is shared but B includes a second org (PAGC), mak
related entity
LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, STANLEY MISSION FIRST NATION (0.82) — Entity B names a joint grant recipient pairing Prince Albert Grand Council WITH Lac La Ronge Indian Band — a consortium/co-applicant record, not the same legal entity as Lac La Ronge Indian Band / Stanley Mission First Nation alone. RELATED
related entity
LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND EDUCATION (0.80) — Entity A is the Education department/arm of Lac La Ronge Indian Band (a CRA qualified donee). Entity B is a federal grant recipient combining Prince Albert Grand Council and Lac La Ronge Indian Band. Overlapping band but different legal ent
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE
medium
recipient · PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE
The dataset shows PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.813
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication brands/divisions: 'La Semaine Cuisine' vs 'La Semaine Extra'. Same parent, different product lines — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc.' but represent distinct publication titles (La Semaine Cuisine vs La Semaine Pratique), suggesting separate publication lines/brands under the same company, not identi
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ (0.82) — Same legal entity 'LES PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC.' but different publication brands/divisions: 'La Semaine Cuisine' vs 'La Semaine Santé'. These are distinct magazine titles under one parent company, making them RELATED not SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication brands/titles (La Semaine Cuisine vs La Semaine Téléromans), suggesting divisions or trade names under one company rather tha
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS (0.82) — Both are publication titles/divisions under the same legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct magazine brands (La Semaine Cuisine vs Spécial Téléromans). Same parent company, different product lines => REL
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ
medium
recipient · PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ
The dataset shows PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.813
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE (0.82) — Same legal entity 'LES PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC.' but different publication brands/divisions: 'La Semaine Cuisine' vs 'La Semaine Santé'. These are distinct magazine titles under one parent company, making them RELATED not SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES)' but represent distinct publication titles (LA SEMAINE EXTRA vs LA SEMAINE SANTÉ), likely separate grant recipients or divisions. RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication titles (La Semaine Pratique vs La Semaine Santé). These are separate publication brands/divisions, not the same legal entity
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES)' but represent distinct publication titles (LA SEMAINE SANTÉ vs LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS). Same company, different branded publications/divisions — RELATED not SAME
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS (0.82) — Both share the same parent company 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication titles ('La Semaine Santé' vs 'Spécial Téléromans'). Same legal entity with different publication imprints — RELATED, not SAME.
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS
medium
recipient · PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS
The dataset shows PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ; PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.808
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE PRATIQUE (0.85) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc.' but represent distinct publication titles (La Semaine Pratique vs La Semaine Téléromans). These are separate publication brands/divisions, not the same legal entity.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE CUISINE (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication brands/titles (La Semaine Cuisine vs La Semaine Téléromans), suggesting divisions or trade names under one company rather tha
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE EXTRA (0.82) — Same parent legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc.' but different publication titles (La Semaine Extra vs La Semaine Téléromans) — likely separate publication/division records under the same company, not identical legal entities.
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - LA SEMAINE SANTÉ (0.82) — Both share the same parent legal entity 'PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES)' but represent distinct publication titles (LA SEMAINE SANTÉ vs LA SEMAINE TÉLÉROMANS). Same company, different branded publications/divisions — RELATED not SAME
related entity
PUBLICATIONS CHARRON & CIE INC. (LES) - SPÉCIAL TÉLÉROMANS (0.82) — Both share the same legal entity 'Publications Charron & Cie Inc. (Les)' but represent distinct publication titles (La Semaine Téléromans vs Spécial Téléromans). Same parent company, different named publications/divisions — RELATED not SAME
The dataset shows RCL DISTRICT HOSPITAL FUND (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.71) — RCL DISTRICT YOUTH EDUCATION; District Hospital Fund; RCL DISTRICT F YOUTH HOSPITAL FUND; RCL TRI-DISTRICT HOSPITAL; RCL DISTRICT E HOSPITAL FUND; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.708
related entity
RCL DISTRICT YOUTH EDUCATION (0.82) — Both appear to be RCL (Royal Canadian Legion) District-level funds—one for hospital, one for youth education. Likely separate funds under the same RCL District umbrella, making them affiliated but distinct legal entities.
related entity
District Hospital Fund (0.72) — Entity B has 'RCL' prefix (Royal Canadian Legion) suggesting it is an RCL-affiliated district hospital fund, while Entity A lacks this prefix. Likely related but distinct legal entities. No shared BN to confirm identity.
related entity
RCL DISTRICT F YOUTH HOSPITAL FUND (0.72) — Both are RCL (Royal Canadian Legion) District hospital funds but differ: A is a general district hospital fund, B is a 'District F Youth Hospital Fund' — different scopes/purposes. Likely related affiliated funds under the same Legion distr
related entity
RCL TRI-DISTRICT HOSPITAL (0.72) — Both are RCL (Royal Canadian Legion) hospital fund entities sharing 'District Hospital' theme, but 'Tri-District' suggests a merger/amalgamation of multiple districts vs. a single district — likely related but distinct legal entities.
related entity
RCL DISTRICT E HOSPITAL FUND (0.65) — Both are RCL (Royal Canadian Legion) district hospital funds but differ: A is 'DISTRICT' and B is 'DISTRICT E', suggesting different geographic districts. Likely related funds under RCL but distinct legal entities.
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA
medium
recipient · RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA
The dataset shows RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA HEALTH CANADA; RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA; Receiver General for Canada (Department of Canadian Heritage); RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & GOVERNMENT; RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA INNOVATION SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 9 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.847
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA HEALTH CANADA (0.92) — Both are federal Crown payee entries under 'Receiver General for Canada' but represent different departments (ESDC vs Health Canada). Same legal umbrella but distinct departmental entities — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA (0.92) — Both are 'Receiver General for Canada' payment instruments but for different federal departments (ESDC vs NRCan). Same Crown payment mechanism, different departmental entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Receiver General for Canada (Department of Canadian Heritage) (0.85) — Both are 'Receiver General for Canada' payment vehicles but represent different federal departments (ESDC vs. Canadian Heritage). Same Crown payment mechanism, different departmental entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & GOVERNMENT (0.82) — Both are 'Receiver General for Canada' disbursement accounts but represent different federal departments (ESDC vs. Public Works). Same Crown payment mechanism, different departmental entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA INNOVATION SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC (0.82) — Both are federal departments receiving Alberta grants/contracts under 'Receiver General for Canada' but represent different departments (ESDC vs ISED). Same Crown entity umbrella but distinct departmental recipients — RELATED, not SAME.
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA INNOVATION SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC
medium
recipient · RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA INNOVATION SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC
The dataset shows RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA INNOVATION SCIENCE AND ECONOMIC (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA HEALTH CANADA; RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA PARKS CANADA; Receiver General for Canada RCMP; Receiver General for Canada (Department of Canadian Heritage); RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.818
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA HEALTH CANADA (0.85) — Both are federal departments under Receiver General for Canada but represent distinct departments: Health Canada vs. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Same Crown paymaster, different legal/operational entities.
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA PARKS CANADA (0.85) — Both share 'Receiver General for Canada' as the legal payee umbrella but represent distinct federal departments: Parks Canada vs. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Same crown receiver, different ministries — RELATED not S
related entity
Receiver General for Canada RCMP (0.85) — Both are 'Receiver General for Canada' payment vehicles but represent different federal departments (RCMP vs. Innovation, Science and Economic Development). Same Crown payee mechanism, different ministerial portfolios — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Receiver General for Canada (Department of Canadian Heritage) (0.82) — Both are 'Receiver General for Canada' disbursement vehicles but represent different federal departments: Canadian Heritage vs. Innovation, Science and Economic Development. Same Crown agent mechanism, different departmental appropriations
related entity
RECEIVER GENERAL FOR CANADA EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA (0.82) — Both are federal departments receiving Alberta grants/contracts under 'Receiver General for Canada' but represent different departments (ESDC vs ISED). Same Crown entity umbrella but distinct departmental recipients — RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows RED DEER ROYAL PURPLE 389 (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — ALBERTA ROYAL PURPLE LODGES ASSOCIATION; ALBERTA ROYAL PURPLE ASSOCIATION; CANADIAN ROYAL PURPLE SOCIETY; EDMONTON LODGE #22 ROYAL PURPLE ASSOCIATION; ELKS AND ROYAL PURPLE FUND FOR CHILDREN; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.857
related entity
ALBERTA ROYAL PURPLE LODGES ASSOCIATION (0.92) — Red Deer Royal Purple #389 is a local lodge chapter; Alberta Royal Purple Lodges Association is the provincial association. Same fraternal organization family but different legal entities: chapter vs. provincial body.
related entity
ALBERTA ROYAL PURPLE ASSOCIATION (0.85) — Red Deer Royal Purple #389 is a local lodge/chapter in Red Deer; Alberta Royal Purple Association is the provincial body. Same fraternal organization family but chapter vs. provincial association = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CANADIAN ROYAL PURPLE SOCIETY (0.85) — Red Deer Royal Purple #389 is a local lodge/chapter in Red Deer, AB; Canadian Royal Purple Society is the national parent organization. Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
EDMONTON LODGE #22 ROYAL PURPLE ASSOCIATION (0.85) — Both are Royal Purple lodges/chapters but in different cities (Red Deer #389 vs Edmonton #22) and different datasets. Same fraternal organization family but distinct local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
ELKS AND ROYAL PURPLE FUND FOR CHILDREN (0.85) — Entity A is the national Elks and Royal Purple Fund for Children charity (BN 107447138). Entity B is a local Royal Purple lodge chapter (#389, Red Deer). Different BN roots, different scope: national fund vs. regional lodge. RELATED as affi
The dataset shows RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST. JOSEPH (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH HEALTH CENTRE OF CORNWALL FUND; RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF SAINT JOSEPH OF THE HOTEL DIEU OF KINGSTON; RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH AMHERSTVIEW, ON; RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTRE OF CORNWALL; RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.725
related entity
RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH HEALTH CENTRE OF CORNWALL FUND (0.75) — Entity A is a registered public foundation (CRA BN 869839175) specifically the health centre fund in Cornwall. Entity B is the broader Religious Hospitallers of St. Joseph organization (AB non-profit, no BN). Foundation vs. parent religious
related entity
RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF SAINT JOSEPH OF THE HOTEL DIEU OF KINGSTON (0.72) — Both refer to the Religious Hospitallers of St. Joseph congregation, but Entity A is specifically the Kingston Hotel Dieu chapter (CRA BN confirmed), while Entity B is a general Alberta non-profit listing with no BN. Likely regional chapter
related entity
RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH AMHERSTVIEW, ON (0.72) — Entity A is the Amherstview, ON chapter with a CRA BN; Entity B is an unlocated Alberta non-profit with no BN, likely a regional chapter or affiliate of the same religious order, not definitively the same legal entity.
related entity
RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTRE OF CORNWALL (0.72) — Entity A is specifically the Cornwall, Ontario health centre chapter with a CRA BN; Entity B is an Alberta non-profit with no BN, likely a different regional chapter or the broader congregation. Same religious order, different legal entitie
related entity
RELIGIOUS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM (0.72) — Entity A is a named health system under the Religious Hospitallers of St. Joseph umbrella; Entity B appears to be the broader religious order/organization. No shared BN root. Health system is likely a subsidiary/affiliate of the parent orde
recipient · RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - MISSISSAUGA
The dataset shows RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - MISSISSAUGA (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - CAMBRIDGE; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - KITCHENER; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - NIAGARA; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - WOODSTOCK; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - BARRIE; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.828
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - CAMBRIDGE (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different city suffixes (Cambridge vs Mississauga) suggest separate regional chapters or locations of the same org. No shared BN to confirm SAME. Prefer RELATED per rules.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - KITCHENER (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different cities (Kitchener vs Mississauga) suggest separate regional chapters/locations of the same parent org. Per rules, different cities => RELATED not SAME.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - NIAGARA (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different geographic chapters (Mississauga vs Niagara). Different cities indicate separate regional entities under a common umbrella, not the same legal organisation.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - WOODSTOCK (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different cities (Mississauga vs Woodstock) suggest separate regional chapters or branches, not the same legal entity. No shared BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED per rules.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - BARRIE (0.82) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but explicitly different cities (Barrie vs Mississauga), suggesting separate regional chapters or branches of the same organization. Per rules, different cities => RELATED not SAME.
recipient · RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - OAKVILLE
The dataset shows RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - OAKVILLE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - NIAGARA; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - BARRIE; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - CAMBRIDGE; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - KITCHENER; RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - WOODSTOCK; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.843
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - NIAGARA (0.88) — Both share the 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' name but differ by city (Niagara vs Oakville), suggesting regional chapters/affiliates of the same parent org. Different cities => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - BARRIE (0.85) — Same brand/foundation name 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different cities (Barrie vs Oakville) suggest separate regional chapters or locations. Per rules, different cities => usually RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - CAMBRIDGE (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different city branches (Cambridge vs Oakville). No shared BN. Different cities indicate separate legal registrations or chapters, so RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - KITCHENER (0.85) — Same brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different cities (Kitchener vs Oakville) suggest regional chapters/branches of the same org, not the same legal entity. No shared BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED.
related entity
RIAA'S ENLIGHTENED FOUNDATION - WOODSTOCK (0.85) — Same foundation brand 'RIAA's Enlightened Foundation' but different city chapters (Oakville vs Woodstock). Different locations suggest separate legal entities or regional chapters — prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
The dataset shows RIMBEY FAS GAS (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.67) — FAS GAS PLUS; FAS GAS PLUS ( ON THE RUN); FAS GAS SERVICES; Fas Gas Stations and Convenience Stores; 2167872 Alberta Ltd. Fas Gas; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.672
related entity
FAS GAS PLUS (0.72) — Rimbey Fas Gas is likely a specific location/franchise of the Fas Gas Plus brand. Same brand family but different legal entities — one is a named location, other is the broader brand. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
related entity
FAS GAS PLUS ( ON THE RUN) (0.72) — Both share 'Fas Gas' brand (Parkland Fuel network) but Entity A is 'Fas Gas Plus (On The Run)' and Entity B is 'Rimbey Fas Gas' — different location/operator names suggesting separate franchise locations, not the same legal entity.
related entity
FAS GAS SERVICES (0.72) — Both share 'Fas Gas' brand but Entity B specifies 'Rimbey' location, suggesting a specific franchise/location vs a generic service entity. No BNs to confirm identity. Likely related franchise locations, not the same legal org.
related entity
Fas Gas Stations and Convenience Stores (0.72) — Both share 'Fas Gas' brand but Entity A is MBA Gas Company Ltd (BN 793546482), a legal entity operating Fas Gas retail. Entity B is 'Rimbey Fas Gas', likely a specific location/franchise. No shared BN; different cities possible. Prefer RELA
related entity
2167872 Alberta Ltd. Fas Gas (0.60) — Entity A is numbered company 2167872 Alberta Ltd. operating as Fas Gas (with BN 713950913); Entity B is 'Rimbey Fas Gas' with no BN. Fas Gas is a fuel franchise; both may be franchisees but no BN match confirms identity. Likely related (sam
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION 91 (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.75) — Royal Canadian Legion Bursary Fund; The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.748
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Bursary Fund (0.85) — Entity A is Royal Canadian Legion Branch 91 (a local branch charity). Entity B is the Legion's Bursary Fund (a separate charitable fund). Both are RCL-affiliated but distinct legal organizations with different purposes.
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.85) — Entity A is Branch 91 of the Royal Canadian Legion (a local chapter/charity), while Entity B is the national Royal Canadian Legion organization. Same brand but different legal entities: national body vs. regional branch.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB (0.75) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion entities but 'NB' suggests New Brunswick provincial command (BN 100862816) while '91' suggests a specific branch number. No shared BN root. Provincial command vs. local branch = RELATED.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.72) — Entity A (BN 890732140) appears to be the Royal Canadian Legion Branch umbrella/parent charity record. Entity B 'Royal Canadian Legion 91' is likely a specific branch (#91) with no BN, suggesting a chapter/affiliate relationship, not identi
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.72) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but 'Branch 91' is a specific numbered branch while Entity B is a generic/unnamed branch entry with BN 108096512. No shared BN, different specificity. Likely related branches of the same national org
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 10 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.75) — The Royal Canadian Legion; Royal Canadian Legion Branch Poppy Fund; THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION WILSON BRANCH 527; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION TODMORDEN BRANCH 10; it appears in 2 datasets (fed, ab) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.752
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.92) — Entity B is a specific local branch (Branch 10) of the Royal Canadian Legion national organization (Entity A). Branch is a subsidiary/chapter of the parent; different legal entities with no shared BN root. Per rules, regional chapter vs. na
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Branch Poppy Fund (0.85) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion entities but Entity A is a consolidated Poppy Fund charity (BN 106830961) covering multiple branches, while Entity B is a specific local branch (#10) with no BN. Same national org, different chapters/purposes.
related entity
THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION WILSON BRANCH 527 (0.85) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered chapters (Branch 527 vs Branch 10). No shared BN root. Distinct legal entities under the same national organization umbrella.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.72) — Entity A (BN 890732140) appears to be a generic/umbrella CRA record for Royal Canadian Legion Branch, while B is a specific numbered branch (#10). Without matching BN or confirmed same branch, prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION TODMORDEN BRANCH 10 (0.62) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion Branch 10 but Entity B specifies 'Todmorden' (Toronto neighbourhood), suggesting a distinct branch. Same branch number but possibly different geographic locations. No BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED ove
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 420 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 302; The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION HANNA BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.823
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 302 (0.95) — Both are branches of the Royal Canadian Legion but with different branch numbers (302 vs 420), indicating distinct local chapters/organizations. Same parent organization (RCL) but different legal entities. RELATED as regional chapters of na
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.92) — Branch 420 is a local chapter of the national Royal Canadian Legion. Different legal entities (no shared BN, branch vs. national body). Regional chapter vs. national organization => RELATED per rules.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION HANNA BRANCH (0.82) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but no shared BN and no evidence of same branch number. Hanna Branch vs Branch 420 are distinct local chapters of the national RCL — related as affiliates, not the same legal entity.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is the generic CRA charity record for Royal Canadian Legion Branch (BN 890732140) with no branch number; Entity B is a specific branch (420) with no BN. Likely same umbrella but cannot confirm same legal entity without matching BN.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is a generic 'Royal Canadian Legion Branch' (BN 108096512) with no branch number; Entity B is specifically 'Branch 420'. Likely different local chapters. No shared BN. Prefer RELATED as branches of the same national organization.
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 530 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; Royal Canadian Legion Branch Poppy Fund; Royal Canadian Legion - Brigden Branch; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.813
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.92) — Branch 530 is a local chapter of the national Royal Canadian Legion. Regional branch vs. national parent = RELATED, not SAME. No shared BN root; different legal entities under the Legion structure.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.82) — Entity A is a generic CRA charity record for 'Royal Canadian Legion Branch' (BN 890732140) likely the national/umbrella entry; Entity B is a specific branch (530) with no BN. Same organization family but different legal units — branch vs. p
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.82) — Entity A (BN 108096512) is a generic Legion Branch record; Entity B is a specific numbered branch (530) with no BN. Different BNs/no shared BN and branch number specificity indicate chapter vs. umbrella — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Branch Poppy Fund (0.82) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but Entity A (BN 106830961) covers multiple branches/poppy funds under one CRA registration, while Entity B is Branch 530 with no BN and only fed data. Different branch numbers = distinct local chapte
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion - Brigden Branch (0.75) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different locals: A is Brigden Branch (CRA charity), B is Branch 530 (fed grants). No shared BN, no evidence Brigden=Branch 530. Same national organization, different chapters => RELATED.
recipient · Royal Canadian Legion Branch No. 86 (Wetaskiwin)
The dataset shows Royal Canadian Legion Branch No. 86 (Wetaskiwin) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION - BRANCH 429; Royal Canadian Legion Cheticamp Branch 32; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH; it appears in 3 datasets (ab, cra, fed) with 4 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.855
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.97) — Entity A is the national Royal Canadian Legion organization (BN 107930570). Entity B is Branch No. 86 (Wetaskiwin), a local chapter with no BN. National body vs. regional branch => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION - BRANCH 429 (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered branches (429 vs 86), different BN roots (A has BN 108096694, B has none). Separate local chapters of the same national organization — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Cheticamp Branch 32 (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered chapters (Branch 32 vs Branch 86). Same national organization affiliation but distinct local legal entities. No shared BN. Per rules, regional chapters are RELATED not SAME.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.82) — Entity A is the generic CRA-registered charity record for 'Royal Canadian Legion Branch' (BN 890732140) covering potentially many branches. Entity B is a specific named branch (#86) with no BN. Likely a chapter of the same org, but not prov
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH (0.75) — Entity A is a generic 'Royal Canadian Legion Branch' with BN 108096512 (likely national or a specific branch). Entity B is specifically 'Branch #86'. Different specific branches => RELATED as affiliates under the Legion umbrella, not provab
The dataset shows Royal Canadian Legion Bursary Fund (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION 91; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BR 60; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BR 83; The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.823
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION 91 (0.85) — Entity A is Royal Canadian Legion Branch 91 (a local branch charity). Entity B is the Legion's Bursary Fund (a separate charitable fund). Both are RCL-affiliated but distinct legal organizations with different purposes.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BR 60 (0.85) — Entity A is the Royal Canadian Legion's national bursary/charitable fund (CRA qualified donee, no BN). Entity B is a specific local branch (BR 60) with its own BN. Same parent organization but distinct legal entities.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BR 83 (0.85) — Entity A is a national bursary/charitable fund under the Royal Canadian Legion umbrella; Entity B is a specific local branch (BR 83) with its own BN. Same parent organization but different legal entities — branch vs. charitable fund.
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.85) — Royal Canadian Legion Bursary Fund is a distinct CRA charity (bursary/scholarship vehicle) affiliated with The Royal Canadian Legion national org. Different legal entities: one is a charity fund, one is the parent legion organization. Paren
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NB (0.82) — Entity A is the Royal Canadian Legion New Brunswick provincial command (BN 100862816); Entity B is a distinct bursary fund entity with no BN. Different legal entities sharing brand; bursary fund is likely affiliated but separate.
recipient · ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION PTSD SERVICE DOGS
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION PTSD SERVICE DOGS (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — PTSD SERVICE DOGS; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command - Service Dogs; Royal Canadian Legion - Ontario Command Support of Service Dogs; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION SERVICE DOGS; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION -S UPPORT OF SERVICE DOGS; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.703
related entity
PTSD SERVICE DOGS (0.72) — Entity B includes 'ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION' prefix, suggesting it is a program or chapter under the Royal Canadian Legion umbrella, while Entity A appears to be a standalone charity. Likely affiliated but distinct legal entities.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command - Service Dogs (0.72) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion service dog programs but differ: A is Ontario Command's Operation Service Dogs; B specifies PTSD Service Dogs. No shared BN. Likely related programs under RCL umbrella but registered as distinct charities.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion - Ontario Command Support of Service Dogs (0.72) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion charity programs involving service dogs, but Entity A is Ontario Command's service dog support program while Entity B specifically names PTSD service dogs — likely distinct CRA qualified donee registrations un
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION SERVICE DOGS (0.72) — Both are RCL service dog programs but 'PTSD SERVICE DOGS' specifies a distinct focus/program. No shared BN, no DBA/OA phrasing. Likely related programs under RCL umbrella but registered separately. Prefer RELATED over SAME per rules.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION -S UPPORT OF SERVICE DOGS (0.72) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion charity programs involving service dogs, but 'Support of Service Dogs' and 'PTSD Service Dogs' appear to be distinct programs/funds, not the same legal entity. No BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED.
recipient · SACRED HEART SCHOOL MARMORA BREAKFAST PROGRAM
The dataset shows SACRED HEART SCHOOL MARMORA BREAKFAST PROGRAM (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 6 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.70) — R C PARISH OF SACRED HEART; SACRED HEART CHURCH; SACRED HEART CHURCH; SACRED HEART CHURCH; Sacred Heart Parish; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.56 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
6
avg related confidence
0.703
related entity
R C PARISH OF SACRED HEART (0.72) — Entity B is a breakfast program associated with Sacred Heart School in Marmora, likely affiliated with or hosted by a Catholic parish, but has no BN and is a distinct program/entity. Different legal identities despite name overlap.
related entity
SACRED HEART CHURCH (0.72) — Entity A is Sacred Heart Church (a registered charity with BN). Entity B is a breakfast program run at Sacred Heart School in Marmora — a distinct program/qualified donee, not the same legal entity as the church.
related entity
SACRED HEART CHURCH (0.72) — Both share 'Sacred Heart' but A is a registered charity (church, BN 129090833) and B is a school breakfast program in Marmora with no BN. Likely affiliated but distinct legal entities — program may operate under or alongside the church.
related entity
SACRED HEART CHURCH (0.72) — Entity B is a breakfast program run at Sacred Heart School in Marmora, likely affiliated with or hosted by Sacred Heart Church (Entity A), but it is a distinct program/qualified donee, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root.
related entity
Sacred Heart Parish (0.72) — Entity A is Sacred Heart Parish (a CRA charity with BN). Entity B is a breakfast program at Sacred Heart School in Marmora, likely a qualified donee program associated with the school/parish but a distinct legal entity or program. No shared
CALGARY ITALIAN CULTURAL CENTRE (0.75) — Both are Italian-Canadian organizations in Calgary but distinct legal entities: A is a cultural centre with BN 106830763; B is the Calgary District chapter of a national congress. Different names, purposes, and no shared BN. Regional chapte
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN OF CANADA (0.92) — Entity B is the Calgary Section (regional chapter) of the national organization (Entity A). Different BN roots (A has CRA BN, B has none). Per rules, national vs. regional chapter => RELATED, not SAME.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COURT SERVICES DIVISION, CIVIL, FAMILY POLICY AND PROGRAMS (0.85) — Both are divisions of Ontario Ministry of Attorney General but serve distinct functions: Indigenous Justice Division vs. Court Services Division (Civil, Family Policy and Programs). Same parent ministry, different operational divisions — RE
dataset sources
fed
source link count
3
entity type
government
confidence
0.7
related entity
OMIROU OTHISTA CHAPTER CJII, OF THE ORDER OF AHEPA (0.75) — Both are separate local chapters of the Order of AHEPA in Alberta (C.J.10 Aurora Borealis vs. CJII Omirou Othista). Same parent fraternal order but distinct chapter entities — RELATED not SAME.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
FRIENDS OF PLAST EDMONTON SOCIETY (0.82) — Both are Edmonton-based Plast (Ukrainian scouting) organizations but legally distinct: one is a 'Friends of' support society, the other is the official Edmonton branch of the national Plast Ukrainian Youth Association of Canada.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS' ASSOCIATION IN CANADA, EDMONTON BRANCH NO. 6 (0.85) — Both are branches of the Polish Combatants Association in Canada, but different branch numbers (Branch #4 vs Branch No. 6) and different cities/regions. Same national parent organization, but distinct local chapters.
dataset sources
fed
source link count
1
entity type
organization
confidence
0.7
related entity
POLISH COMBATANTS ASSOCIATION IN CANADA INC BRANCH NO 20 CUL (0.88) — Both are branches of the same national Polish Combatants Association in Canada, but different numbered branches (No. 20 vs. No. 6) in different cities. Same parent organization, distinct local chapters => RELATED.
