The dataset shows entities the upstream entity-resolution pipeline adjudicated as RELATED to other funded entities — distinct legal registrations that share a name, structure, or governance lineage — where related-party relationships are more likely to materialise.
Detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
At-a-glance
50 of 17,501 matches on this page · filtering clear filter ×
Glassbox surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is a calibrated read on how strongly the dataset matches the pattern definition — a starting point for review, not a verdict.
● Observation
The match meets the pattern threshold but the signal is the lower band. Normal review queue.
● Attention
The match exceeds the routine threshold. Worth a closer look — pull the source rows, walk the citation.
● Flag
The match is in the highest band of the calibrated scale. Recommend: prioritise for active review.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · general.entity_merge_candidates.llm_verdict = 'RELATED' (Splink candidate → LLM adjudication) edges joined to general.entity_golden_records on both sides · ≥ 2 distinct RELATED counterparties · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = related-counterparty count · severity weights cross-dataset presence and source-record volume
17,501 matches· page 16· severity = flag (this page)
Live table · computed Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:16:17 GMT
Burger King
high
recipient · Burger King
The dataset shows Burger King (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — BURGER KING FOUNDATION INC.; BURGER KING RESTAURANT # 10936; BURGER KING RESTAURANT #11896; BURGER KING RESTAURANT #12848; BURGER KING RESTAURANT #20792; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 6 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.734
related entity
BURGER KING FOUNDATION INC. (0.75) — Burger King Foundation Inc. is a non-profit/charitable foundation, while Burger King is the commercial restaurant chain. Foundation vs. operating company = RELATED, not SAME. Different legal entities with shared brand.
related entity
BURGER KING RESTAURANT # 10936 (0.75) — Entity A 'BURGER KING' appears to be a general/corporate entity while Entity B is a specific numbered franchise location (#10936). Individual restaurant locations are subsidiaries/affiliates of the parent brand, not the same legal entity.
related entity
BURGER KING RESTAURANT #11896 (0.75) — Entity B is a specific numbered Burger King franchise location (#11896), while Entity A is the broader Burger King brand/entity. A specific restaurant outlet is a franchise/subsidiary of the parent brand, not the same legal entity.
related entity
BURGER KING RESTAURANT #12848 (0.75) — Entity B is a specific numbered franchise location (#12848) of the Burger King brand, while Entity A appears to be the broader brand/corporate entity. A specific restaurant location is a subsidiary/affiliate, not the same legal entity.
related entity
BURGER KING RESTAURANT #20792 (0.75) — Entity B is a specific numbered Burger King franchise location (#20792), while Entity A is the broader brand/entity. A specific restaurant unit is a franchisee or subsidiary, not the same legal org as the parent brand. RELATED preferred per
recipient · CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY MOUNT ROYAL
The dataset shows CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY MOUNT ROYAL (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.88) — CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - AIRDRIE; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB BANFF; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - CALGARY CHINOOK; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY DOWNTOWN; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY NORTH; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.884
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - AIRDRIE (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club network but serve different cities/areas (Airdrie vs. Calgary Mount Royal). Same parent organization, different local chapters — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB BANFF (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club network but serve different locations (Banff vs. Calgary Mount Royal). Same national affiliation but distinct legal entities/clubs. Per rules, regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - CALGARY CHINOOK (0.92) — Both are local chapters of Canadian Progress Club in Calgary but have distinct chapter names (Chinook vs Mount Royal), indicating separate legal organisations under the same national umbrella. RELATED as affiliate chapters.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY DOWNTOWN (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club operating in Calgary but in different districts (Downtown vs. Mount Royal). Same parent organization, distinct local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY NORTH (0.92) — Both are local chapters of Canadian Progress Club in Calgary but distinct clubs: 'Calgary North' vs 'Calgary Mount Royal'. Same parent organization, different chapters/affiliates. No shared BN. RELATED not SAME.
recipient · CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY PRAIRIE ROSE
The dataset shows CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY PRAIRIE ROSE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY BOW RIVER.; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - CALGARY CHINOOK; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY CITY CENTRE; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY DOWNTOWN; CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY NORTH; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.891
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY BOW RIVER. (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club in Calgary but different chapters (Prairie Rose vs. Bow River). Same parent organization, distinct local clubs — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB - CALGARY CHINOOK (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club operating in Calgary, but 'Calgary Chinook' and 'Calgary Prairie Rose' are distinct chapters/affiliates of the same national organization, not the same legal entity.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY CITY CENTRE (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club organisation — 'Calgary City Centre' and 'Calgary Prairie Rose' are different chapters/clubs. Same parent federation, different legal entities. RELATED per chapter vs. national
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB CALGARY DOWNTOWN (0.92) — Both are local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club operating in Calgary but are distinct clubs: 'Downtown' vs 'Prairie Rose'. Same parent organization, different local chapters — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CANADIAN PROGRESS CLUB, CALGARY NORTH (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Canadian Progress Club organization operating in Calgary, but with different chapter names (North vs Prairie Rose). Same parent organization, different chapters = RELATED not SAME.
The dataset shows DAYS INN (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.69) — DAYS INN CALGARY NORTH BALZAC; DAYS INN CALGARY SOUTH; DAYS INN EDMONTON SOUTH; Days Inn Edmonton Airport (Denham Hotels Ltd); DAYS INN EDMONTON DOWNTOWN MAPLE HOSPITALITY (ALBERTA) LTD.; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.69
related entity
DAYS INN CALGARY NORTH BALZAC (0.75) — DAYS INN is likely a brand/franchisor or generic reference; DAYS INN CALGARY NORTH BALZAC is a specific location. No BN to confirm same legal entity. Different specific vs. generic scope => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
DAYS INN CALGARY SOUTH (0.75) — Days Inn Calgary South is a specific franchise location of the Days Inn brand. Entity A is the generic brand/franchisor name; Entity B is a distinct Calgary South property. Different locations/entities — RELATED as brand vs. specific hotel.
related entity
DAYS INN EDMONTON SOUTH (0.75) — Days Inn Edmonton South is a specific location/franchise of the Days Inn brand. Entity A is likely a generic or different Days Inn property. Different specific locations => RELATED (franchise/brand relationship), not SAME legal entity.
related entity
Days Inn Edmonton Airport (Denham Hotels Ltd) (0.72) — Entity A 'DAYS INN' is likely a generic/brand reference or different property; Entity B is a specific legal entity 'Denham Hotels Ltd.' operating Days Inn Edmonton Airport. Different legal entities under the same brand.
related entity
DAYS INN EDMONTON DOWNTOWN MAPLE HOSPITALITY (ALBERTA) LTD. (0.72) — Entity A 'DAYS INN' is a generic/brand-level name while Entity B is a specific legal entity (Maple Hospitality Alberta Ltd.) operating a Days Inn franchise in Edmonton Downtown. Brand vs. franchisee operator — RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows DELBURNE CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene; CANADIAN WORLD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; Church of the Nazarene Canada; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE CANADA WEST DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.826
related entity
Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene (0.85) — Delburne Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation in Delburne, AB. Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene is the regional district body. Different BN roots, different legal entities; parent district vs. local church = RELATED.
related entity
CANADIAN WORLD CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.85) — Both are Church of the Nazarene entities but distinct: A is the national/world-level Canadian body (CRA charity), B is a local congregation in Delburne, AB. Regional chapter vs. national denomination => RELATED.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.85) — Delburne Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation in Delburne, AB affiliated with the Church of the Nazarene denomination. Different BN roots (B has none), different geographic scope — local chapter vs. national/registered charity.
related entity
Church of the Nazarene Canada (0.85) — Delburne Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation affiliated with Church of the Nazarene Canada (the national body). Different legal entities: local chapter vs. national organization, no shared BN root. RELATED as affiliate/member con
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE CANADA WEST DISTRICT (0.85) — Entity A is the Canada West District (regional body) of the Church of the Nazarene with a CRA BN; Entity B is a local congregation in Delburne, AB under the same denomination. District vs. local church = RELATED, not SAME.
DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE, NOVA SCOTIA DIVISION (THE)
high
recipient · DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE, NOVA SCOTIA DIVISION (THE)
The dataset shows DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE, NOVA SCOTIA DIVISION (THE) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — THE DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD, YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE, NEW BRUNSWICK DIVISION LTD.; DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD IN CANADA (BC & YUKON DIVISION); THE DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE(ONTARIO); The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Young Canadians Challenge (Manitoba Division) Inc.; The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Canada - Newfoundland and Labrador Inc.; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.849
related entity
THE DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD, YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE, NEW BRUNSWICK DIVISION LTD. (0.95) — Both are regional divisions of the Duke of Edinburgh's Award Young Canadians Challenge program, but one is the New Brunswick Division (with CRA BN) and the other is the Nova Scotia Division — different legal entities in different provinces.
related entity
DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD IN CANADA (BC & YUKON DIVISION) (0.92) — Both are regional divisions of the Duke of Edinburgh's Award Young Canadians Challenge program, but BC & Yukon (BN 125906545) and Nova Scotia are separate legal entities/chapters. Different regions, different BN roots — RELATED as affiliate
related entity
THE DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S AWARD YOUNG CANADIANS CHALLENGE(ONTARIO) (0.92) — Same program brand (Duke of Edinburgh's Award Young Canadians Challenge) but different provincial divisions: Ontario (BN 126081884) vs Nova Scotia. Different legal entities/chapters of the same national program. No shared BN root.
related entity
The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Young Canadians Challenge (Manitoba Division) Inc. (0.92) — Both are Duke of Edinburgh's Award Young Canadians Challenge divisions but in different provinces (Manitoba vs Nova Scotia). No shared BN root. These are distinct regional chapters of the same national program — RELATED, not SAME.
EMMANUEL GOSPEL CHURCH FORT MCMURRAY (THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA)
high
recipient · EMMANUEL GOSPEL CHURCH FORT MCMURRAY (THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA)
The dataset shows EMMANUEL GOSPEL CHURCH FORT MCMURRAY (THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA) (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada; THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA, INTERNATIONAL OFFICE; Maritime District Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada; PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA, ALBERTA CHAPTER; Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada District Office; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Denominational hierarchies (dioceses, synods, conferences, councils, presbyteries) routinely move funds between the parent body and congregations; structural relatedness here is expected.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.851
related entity
The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada (0.92) — Entity B is a local congregation (Emmanuel Gospel Church, Fort McMurray) operating under the PAOC umbrella, not the national head office. Different legal entities: one is the national body (BN 889506836), the other a member church. Parent/s
related entity
THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA, INTERNATIONAL OFFICE (0.88) — Entity A is the national international office of Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada; Entity B is a local church in Fort McMurray affiliated with the same denomination. Same denomination but different legal entities (national office vs. local
related entity
Maritime District Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada (0.85) — Entity A is the Maritime District regional body of Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada (CRA charity, BN 119033295). Entity B is a local congregation in Fort McMurray affiliated with PAOC. Different legal entities, different BNs, different geog
related entity
PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA, ALBERTA CHAPTER (0.85) — Entity A is the Alberta provincial chapter of Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada; Entity B is a local Fort McMurray congregation affiliated with the same denomination. Different organizational levels (chapter vs. local church), different data
The dataset shows Fairview Church of the Nazarene (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - CANADA WEST DISTRICT; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - NATIONAL; Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene; Church of the Nazarene Canada; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE IN ONTARIO; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.837
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - CANADA WEST DISTRICT (0.92) — Entity A is the Canada West District (regional body, CRA charity BN 372804406). Entity B is a local congregation in Fairview, AB. Same denomination but different legal entities: district vs. local church.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - NATIONAL (0.92) — Entity A is the national-level CRA-registered charity for Church of the Nazarene (BN 127875267); Entity B is a local congregation in Fairview, AB with no BN. National body vs. local chapter = RELATED.
related entity
Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene (0.85) — Entity A is the Canada Central District administrative body of the Church of the Nazarene (CRA charity, BN 118828350). Entity B is a local congregation in Fairview, AB. Same denomination but district org vs. local church = RELATED.
related entity
Church of the Nazarene Canada (0.85) — Entity A is the national Canadian Church of the Nazarene charity (BN 127875276). Entity B is a local congregation in Fairview, AB with no BN. Local chapter vs. national body = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE IN ONTARIO (0.85) — Entity A is a provincial umbrella/regional body (Church of the Nazarene in Ontario, BN 188282350, CRA charity). Entity B is a local congregation in Fairview, AB. Same denomination, different legal entities and jurisdictions.
recipient · FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST SOCIETY
The dataset shows FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST SOCIETY (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.66) — FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST; First Church of Christ, Scientist, Etobicoke; First Church of Christ, Scientist, Kitchener, Ontario; FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, TORONTO; FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, WINNIPEG; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.661
related entity
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST (0.72) — Entity A is a CRA-registered charity with a BN (Halifax branch of the Boston Mother Church). Entity B is an Alberta non-profit 'Society' with no BN — likely a separate local congregation or affiliate, not the same legal entity.
related entity
First Church of Christ, Scientist, Etobicoke (0.72) — Both share 'First Church of Christ Scientist' name but A is a CRA-registered charity in Etobicoke (Ontario) with a BN, while B is an Alberta non-profit society with no BN. Different jurisdictions and legal forms suggest related congregation
related entity
First Church of Christ, Scientist, Kitchener, Ontario (0.72) — Entity A is a CRA-registered charity in Kitchener, ON with a BN. Entity B is an Alberta non-profit with no BN, named 'FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST SOCIETY' — likely a different local congregation. Different provinces, different legal st
related entity
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, TORONTO (0.72) — Both relate to First Church of Christ Scientist but differ: A is a Toronto CRA-registered charity with BN; B is an Alberta non-profit society with no BN. Different jurisdictions and legal forms suggest related congregations, not the same en
related entity
FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, WINNIPEG (0.72) — Both are Christian Science congregations sharing core name but differ: A is a specific Winnipeg church (CRA registered, BN 130649445), B is an Alberta non-profit 'Society' with no BN. Different provinces, different legal forms, likely separ
The dataset shows FOUNTAIN TIRE CALGARY MORAINE ROAD LTD (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — FOUNTAIN TIRE EDMONTON COMMONWEALTH LTD.; FOUNTAIN TIRE EDSON LTD.; FOUNTAIN TIRE FALHER CO. LTD.; FOUNTAIN TIRE (KELOWNA) LTD; FOUNTAIN TIRE LEDUC; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.828
related entity
FOUNTAIN TIRE EDMONTON COMMONWEALTH LTD. (0.85) — Both share 'Fountain Tire' brand but are different legal entities in different cities (Edmonton Commonwealth vs Calgary Moraine Road). No shared BN root. Likely franchisee affiliates under the Fountain Tire network, not the same legal org.
related entity
FOUNTAIN TIRE EDSON LTD. (0.85) — Both are Fountain Tire franchise locations but in different cities (Edson vs. Calgary Moraine Road). Separate legal entities under the same franchise brand. Different cities rule applies — RELATED as affiliates, not SAME.
related entity
FOUNTAIN TIRE FALHER CO. LTD. (0.85) — Both are distinct Fountain Tire franchise locations (Falher vs. Calgary Moraine Road) — separate legal entities under the same brand. Different cities, no shared BN. Franchise affiliates, not the same legal org.
related entity
FOUNTAIN TIRE (KELOWNA) LTD (0.85) — Both share the 'Fountain Tire' brand but are distinct legal entities: one is in Kelowna with BN 102507332, the other is a Calgary Moraine Road location with no BN. Different cities, different legal names, likely franchisee/affiliate structu
related entity
FOUNTAIN TIRE LEDUC (0.85) — Both are Fountain Tire franchise locations but in different cities (Leduc vs Calgary Moraine Road). Different legal entities under the same franchisor brand. No shared BN. Different city = RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF NL (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION CALGARY; HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF BC; HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF B.C AND YUKON; HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF PEI INC; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.858
related entity
HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION CALGARY (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of the Heart and Stroke Foundation but serve different provinces (Calgary/Alberta vs. Newfoundland and Labrador). Same national parent, different legal regional entities.
related entity
HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF BC (0.92) — Both are provincial chapters of the Heart and Stroke Foundation but serve different provinces (BC vs NL). Different BN roots (A has 118818340, B has none assigned). Regional chapters of same national org => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF B.C AND YUKON (0.92) — Both are regional chapters of Heart and Stroke Foundation but cover different provinces (BC/Yukon vs. Newfoundland & Labrador). Different BN roots, different geographic scope. Same national family but distinct legal entities.
related entity
HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF PEI INC (0.92) — Both are provincial chapters of the Heart and Stroke Foundation but cover different provinces: PEI (Entity A, BN 131341844) vs. Newfoundland & Labrador (Entity B, no BN). Different legal entities, same national network.
related entity
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (0.88) — Entity A is the national Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Entity B is the Newfoundland & Labrador provincial chapter. Same brand/network but distinct legal registrations (separate CRA qualified donees). Regional chapter vs. national =
The dataset shows Holiday Inn Express (company) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.63) — HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS COLD LAKE; HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS CALGARY UNIVERSITY; HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS LETHBRIDGE; HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS & SUITES EDMONTON IN; HOLIDAY INN EXPR DOWNT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 90 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.634
related entity
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS COLD LAKE (0.75) — Entity B is a specific location (Cold Lake) operating under the Holiday Inn Express brand/franchise. Entity A appears to be a broader or different Holiday Inn Express entity. Different specific locations => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS CALGARY UNIVERSITY (0.72) — Entity B is a specific Holiday Inn Express location (Calgary University), while Entity A is a generic/umbrella record. Without BNs to confirm same legal entity, specific location vs. generic brand name suggests RELATED rather than SAME.
related entity
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS LETHBRIDGE (0.70) — Entity B specifies a Lethbridge location; Entity A is a generic 'Holiday Inn Express' brand name across 46 source links likely covering multiple locations. Specific city franchise vs. brand-level record => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS & SUITES EDMONTON IN (0.70) — Entity A 'Holiday Inn Express' is a generic/brand-level entry with 46 source links; Entity B specifies a distinct location 'Edmonton'. Different specific properties under the same brand — likely different legal operators. Prefer RELATED ove
related entity
HOLIDAY INN EXPR DOWNT (0.62) — Both are Holiday Inn Express branded properties but B specifies 'Downtown' location, suggesting a distinct franchise/property. No BN to confirm same legal entity. Different locations likely mean different operators under the same brand.
Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Calgary Chapter
high
recipient · Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Calgary Chapter
The dataset shows Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Calgary Chapter (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.92) — Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Edmonton Chapter; LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA MEDICINE HAT CHAPTER; Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Red Deer Chapter; LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VERNON CHAPTER; Learning Disabilities Association of Manitoba; it appears in 2 datasets (ab, fed) with 5 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.921
related entity
Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Edmonton Chapter (0.95) — Both are chapters of Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta but in different cities (Edmonton vs Calgary). Different BN roots (A has BN, B has none). Regional chapters of same provincial org = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA MEDICINE HAT CHAPTER (0.95) — Both are chapters of the Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta but serve different cities (Calgary vs Medicine Hat). Different regional chapters of the same provincial association — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta - Red Deer Chapter (0.95) — Both are chapters of Learning Disabilities Association of Alberta but in different cities (Red Deer vs Calgary). Different BN roots (A has BN, B has none). Regional chapters of same provincial association = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VERNON CHAPTER (0.95) — Both are regional chapters of the Learning Disabilities Association network but in different provinces (BC-Vernon vs Alberta-Calgary) with different BN roots and datasets. Same national umbrella, distinct legal entities.
LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
high
recipient · LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA
The dataset shows LOCAL 1001 (CALGARY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — LOCAL #100 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.; LOCAL #176 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA.; LOCAL #104 (DESMARAIS) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #11 (ONOWAY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.893
related entity
LOCAL #100 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA. (0.95) — Both are local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but different locals in different cities: Local 1001 in Calgary vs Local #100 in Edmonton. Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
LOCAL #176 (EDSON) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA. (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but in different cities (Calgary Local 1001 vs Edson Local 176). Different locals = different legal entities, related as affiliates under the same parent association.
related entity
LOCAL #104 (DESMARAIS) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #104 (Desmarais) vs Local 1001 (Calgary). Different local numbers and different geographic locations confirm separate legal entities under a common parent body.
related entity
LOCAL #11 (ONOWAY) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta but different numbered locals in different cities (Onoway #11 vs Calgary #1001). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
recipient · METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394
The dataset shows METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION LOCAL 394 (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.87) — LOCAL #228 (SMITH) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; LOCAL #333 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; LOCAL #97 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION; Métis Nation of Alberta Association; Metis Nation of Alberta Otipemisiwak Metis Government; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.866
related entity
LOCAL #228 (SMITH) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association (Local 394 vs Local 228 Smith). Same parent organization but different numbered locals = separate legal entities. RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #333 (ST. PAUL) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.95) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Nation of Alberta Association — Local 394 vs Local 333 (St. Paul). Same parent organization but different numbered locals = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
LOCAL #97 (EDMONTON) OF THE METIS NATION OF ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of Metis Nation of Alberta Association — Local 394 vs Local 97 (Edmonton). Same parent organization but different numbered locals = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
Métis Nation of Alberta Association (0.88) — Entity B is a local chapter (Local 394) of the Métis Nation of Alberta Association (Entity A). Local chapters are subsidiary/affiliate bodies, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root confirms they are distinct legal registrations.
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec
high
recipient · Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec
The dataset shows Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.91) — AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE LA LANAUDIÈRE; AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE LA MONTÉRÉGIE; AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE L'ESTRIE; AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE L'OUTAOUAIS; AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DES LAURENTIDES; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 38 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.907
related entity
AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE LA LANAUDIÈRE (0.92) — Entity A is a regional health agency (Lanaudière) formerly under Quebec's health system structure; Entity B is the provincial ministry (MSSS). Related as regional agency to its provincial parent ministry, not the same legal entity.
related entity
AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE LA MONTÉRÉGIE (0.92) — Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de la Montérégie was a regional health agency under the Quebec MSSS, abolished in 2015. They are related (parent/subordinate) but distinct legal entities with different mandates and geographic scop
related entity
AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE L'ESTRIE (0.92) — Entity A is a regional health agency (Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de l'Estrie) operating under Entity B, the provincial ministry (MSSS Québec). They are distinct legal bodies: one is a regional agency, the other the parent pr
related entity
AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE L'OUTAOUAIS (0.92) — Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de l'Outaouais was a regional health agency (abolished 2015) under Quebec's MSSS. It is a subordinate regional body of the provincial ministry — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
AGENCE DE LA SANTÉ ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DES LAURENTIDES (0.92) — Entity A is a regional health agency (Agence des Laurentides) — a distinct administrative body covering the Laurentides region. Entity B is the provincial ministry (MSSS Quebec). The agency was subordinate to the ministry but a separate leg
The dataset shows MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CMP (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.73) — MINT HEALTH + DRUGS STERLING; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CHURCH STREET; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS FRANKLIN STATION; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS PEACE RIVER; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.734
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS STERLING (0.82) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix: STERLING vs CMP (likely different pharmacy locations/branches). Same franchise chain but likely separate legal entities or locations, not identical organisations.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CHURCH STREET (0.75) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix: 'CHURCH STREET' vs 'CMP' (likely different pharmacy locations/branches). Same chain but distinct operating units, not the same legal entity.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE (0.75) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ in location/branch suffix: 'CRYSTAL RIDGE' vs 'CMP'. Likely separate pharmacy locations under same brand. Different entities per rules; prefer RELATED as branches of same operator.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS FRANKLIN STATION (0.75) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix (FRANKLIN STATION vs CMP), suggesting distinct pharmacy locations under the same chain. Likely same franchisor/parent but different legal operating entities.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS PEACE RIVER (0.75) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but B specifies 'PEACE RIVER' location while A has 'CMP' suffix—likely different pharmacy locations/franchises under same brand. No BN to confirm shared legal entity. Prefer RELATED.
The dataset shows MINT HEALTH + DRUGS FESTIVAL PLACE (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.79) — MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS FRANKLIN STATION; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS: BEAVERLODGE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS BLUE BOTTLE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CHURCH STREET; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.791
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE (0.85) — Both are 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' pharmacy locations under the same brand/chain, but distinguished by location suffix (Crystal Ridge vs Festival Place). Likely same corporate parent but distinct operating entities/locations.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS FRANKLIN STATION (0.85) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix (Franklin Station vs Festival Place), indicating separate franchise/branch locations of the same chain, not the same legal entity.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS: BEAVERLODGE (0.82) — Both are 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' branded pharmacies but at different locations (Beaverlodge vs Festival Place). Likely same chain/franchisor but distinct legal or operational locations. No BN to confirm single entity.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS BLUE BOTTLE (0.82) — Both share 'Mint Health + Drugs' brand but are distinct pharmacy locations (Blue Bottle vs Festival Place). No shared BN root; likely same franchisor/operator but separate legal entities or branches. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CHURCH STREET (0.82) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix (Church Street vs Festival Place), suggesting separate franchise/branch locations of the same chain, not identical legal entities.
The dataset shows MINT HEALTH + DRUGS: MAINSTREET (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — MINT HEALTH + DRUGS: BEAVERLODGE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS PEACE RIVER; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS SHERWOOD; MINT HEALTH + DRUGS BLUE BOTTLE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.803
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS: BEAVERLODGE (0.85) — Both share the 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix (BEAVERLODGE vs MAINSTREET), indicating separate pharmacy locations/franchises under a common brand — likely affiliates, not the same legal entity.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS CRYSTAL RIDGE (0.85) — Both share the 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but are distinct retail pharmacy locations (Crystal Ridge vs. Mainstreet). Likely same franchise/owner but registered as separate legal entities or operating units. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS PEACE RIVER (0.85) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location (Mainstreet vs Peace River). Likely different franchise/branch locations under same parent brand — RELATED, not SAME legal entity.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS SHERWOOD (0.85) — Both share 'MINT HEALTH + DRUGS' brand but differ by location suffix (MAINSTREET vs SHERWOOD), suggesting separate pharmacy locations/franchises under same brand — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
MINT HEALTH + DRUGS BLUE BOTTLE (0.82) — Both share 'Mint Health + Drugs' brand but are distinct store locations (Blue Bottle vs Mainstreet). No shared BN root; likely same franchise/operator but separate legal or operating entities. Prefer RELATED over SAME.
recipient · NEW LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
The dataset shows NEW LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.74) — Church of the Nazarene Canada; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.742
related entity
Church of the Nazarene Canada (0.82) — Entity A is the national Canadian denomination body (BN 127875276). Entity B is a local congregation named 'New Life Fellowship Church of the Nazarene' with no BN, Alberta-only. Local church vs. national body = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.75) — Entity B is a specific local congregation ('New Life Fellowship') affiliated with the Church of the Nazarene denomination. No shared BN root; different legal entities. Local chapter vs. broader denominational body => RELATED.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.75) — Entity A is a national/registered CRA charity 'Church of the Nazarene' (BN 891006389). Entity B is a specific local congregation 'New Life Fellowship Church of the Nazarene' with no BN, in AB non-profit registry. Likely a local chapter/affi
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.75) — Entity A is a specific local Drumheller congregation of Church of the Nazarene (BN registered charity). Entity B is a distinct local congregation 'New Life Fellowship Church of the Nazarene' with no BN, different name, different dataset. Bo
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (0.75) — Both are Church of the Nazarene congregations but different local churches: A is Truro Church of the Nazarene (CRA BN 106926090), B is New Life Fellowship Church of the Nazarene (AB non-profit, no BN). Different entities under the same deno
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT
high
recipient · OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT
The dataset shows OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.95) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.95
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Athabasca Landing vs Calgary Elbow). Same parent organization, different regional chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Foothills vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different legal district entities => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Fort Edmonton vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts (Calgary Elbow vs Fort McMurray). Same parent organization, distinct regional bodies.
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT
high
recipient · OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT
The dataset shows OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.95) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.948
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Foothills vs. Athabasca Landing). Same parent organization, different regional chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Foothills vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different legal district entities => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts: Fort Edmonton vs. Foothills. Same parent org, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Foothills vs Fort McMurray). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT
high
recipient · OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT
The dataset shows OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.95) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC STE. ANNE METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.949
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LAC STE. ANNE METIS DISTRICT (0.97) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Jasper House vs. Lac Ste. Anne). Same parent org, different local entities — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Jasper House vs Athabasca Landing). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Jasper House vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Jasper House vs. Foothills). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MEDICINE HAT METIS DISTRICT
high
recipient · OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MEDICINE HAT METIS DISTRICT
The dataset shows OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MEDICINE HAT METIS DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.95) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.95
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts (Medicine Hat vs. Athabasca Landing). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but serve different geographic districts (Medicine Hat vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different local chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Medicine Hat vs. Foothills). Same parent org, different local chapters => RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts (Fort Edmonton vs. Medicine Hat). Same parent organization, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
Otipemisiwak Metis Government - District Council of St. Albert Métis District (11)
high
recipient · Otipemisiwak Metis Government - District Council of St. Albert Métis District (11)
The dataset shows Otipemisiwak Metis Government - District Council of St. Albert Métis District (11) (government) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.93) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LESSER SLAVE LAKE METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MEDICINE HAT METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 2 datasets (ab, fed) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.934
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Métis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (St. Albert vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent organization, different local chapters — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Métis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (St. Albert vs. Foothills). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are district councils under Otipemisiwak Metis Government but represent different geographic districts: St. Albert (District 11) vs. Fort McMurray. Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LESSER SLAVE LAKE METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Métis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (St. Albert vs. Lesser Slave Lake). Same parent org, different regional bodies — RELATED not SAME.
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ST. PAUL-COLD LAKE METIS DISTRICT
high
recipient · OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ST. PAUL-COLD LAKE METIS DISTRICT
The dataset shows OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ST. PAUL-COLD LAKE METIS DISTRICT (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.95) — OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT; OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.948
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF ATHABASCA LANDING METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Athabasca Landing vs. St. Paul-Cold Lake). They are affiliates/chapters of the same parent body, not the same le
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CALGARY ELBOW METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic regions (St. Paul-Cold Lake vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FOOTHILLS METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Foothills vs. St. Paul-Cold Lake). Same parent org, different legal regional bodies => RELATED.
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but serve different geographic districts (Fort Edmonton vs. St. Paul-Cold Lake). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 302 (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.81) — ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 105; Royal Canadian Legion Branch 1 Calgary; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 420; The Royal Canadian Legion; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION (ASSINIBOIA BRANCH); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
Why this may be benign · Federated charities (United Way / Centraide, Jewish federations, national bodies with provincial or local chapters) are legally distinct entities that are related by charter — relatedness is disclosed, not hidden.
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.808
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 105 (0.95) — Both are branches of the Royal Canadian Legion but with different branch numbers (105 vs 302), indicating distinct local chapters/legal entities under the same national organization. Same parent org, different legal units.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Branch 1 Calgary (0.95) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but different numbered branches (1 vs 302). Legion branches are separate legal entities. No shared BN root. High name overlap but distinct organisations under the same national parent.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 420 (0.95) — Both are branches of the Royal Canadian Legion but with different branch numbers (302 vs 420), indicating distinct local chapters/organizations. Same parent organization (RCL) but different legal entities. RELATED as regional chapters of na
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion (0.92) — Entity B is a local branch (Branch 302) of the Royal Canadian Legion national organization (Entity A). Branch vs. national body = regional chapter relationship, not the same legal entity. No shared BN root confirms separate registration.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION (ASSINIBOIA BRANCH) (0.82) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion branches but no evidence they are the same branch. 'Assiniboia Branch' and 'Branch 302' may or may not coincide; no shared BN to confirm. Treat as RELATED (same national organization, different branches).
recipient · ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NS/NU COMMAND POPPY FUND
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION NS/NU COMMAND POPPY FUND (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — Royal Canadian Legion NS/NU Command Benevolent Fund; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUND INC.; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUNDINC.; ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.851
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion NS/NU Command Benevolent Fund (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion NS/NU Command funds but serve distinct purposes: 'Poppy Fund' vs 'Benevolent Fund'. Same provincial command, different legal charitable funds. RELATED affiliates, not the same entity.
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUND INC. (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial Command Poppy Funds but serve different regions (Quebec vs NS/NU). Different BN roots (A has 887454280, B has none recorded). Same structure/brand family but distinct legal entities by province/terr
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUNDINC. (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial command Poppy Funds but serve different provinces (Quebec vs NS/NU). Different BN roots (A has 887454288, B has none but is a distinct entity). Regional affiliates of same national body, not the sam
related entity
ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION (0.88) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial/territorial commands but serve different regions (Alberta-NWT vs NS/NU) and the second is specifically a Poppy Fund. Same national umbrella but distinct legal entities.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command (0.88) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial command entities but serve different provinces (Ontario vs NS/NU). Different BN roots (A has 870781618, B has none assigned). Regional chapters of the same national organization — RELATED, not SAME.
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Charitable Foundation
high
recipient · Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Charitable Foundation
The dataset shows Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Charitable Foundation (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.87) — BRITISH COLUMBIA/YUKON COMMAND OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION FOUNDATION; ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUND INC.; ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND, RED DEER BRANCH NO. 35 OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Homeless Veterans Fund; The Royal Canadian Legion Dominion Command; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 20 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.874
related entity
BRITISH COLUMBIA/YUKON COMMAND OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION FOUNDATION (0.95) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion charitable foundations but serve different provincial commands: BC/Yukon (BN 880760285) vs Ontario. Different BN roots, different geographic jurisdictions, separate legal entities under the same national organ
related entity
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION QUEBEC COMMAND POPPY FUND INC. (0.95) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial command funds/foundations but serve different provinces (Quebec Poppy Fund vs Ontario Charitable Foundation) with different BN roots and distinct legal mandates. Related affiliates under the RCL nat
related entity
ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND, RED DEER BRANCH NO. 35 OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION (0.92) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion entities but distinct: A is the Ontario Command Charitable Foundation (CRA charity); B is a specific Alberta-NWT Command branch (Red Deer No.35). Different provinces, different legal structures, different purp
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Homeless Veterans Fund (0.92) — Both are RCL Ontario Command charities but legally distinct: A is the 'Homeless Veterans Fund' (BN 850781614), B is the 'Charitable Foundation' (no BN). Different mandates/legal identities under the same provincial command umbrella.
related entity
The Royal Canadian Legion Dominion Command (0.92) — Entity A is the Ontario Command Charitable Foundation (provincial level); Entity B is the Dominion Command (national level). Both are Royal Canadian Legion entities but distinct legal organizations at different command levels — RELATED as a
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND WOUNDED WARRIORS ADVEN
high
recipient · ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND WOUNDED WARRIORS ADVEN
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION ONTARIO COMMAND WOUNDED WARRIORS ADVEN (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — Royal Canadian Legion New Brunswick Command; ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Bursary Fund; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Charitable Foundation; Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Poppy Fund; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.848
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion New Brunswick Command (0.95) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion provincial commands/programs but in different provinces (New Brunswick vs Ontario) and serve different purposes. They share the RCL parent brand but are distinct legal entities — regional chapter vs. Ontario p
related entity
ALBERTA-NWT COMMAND ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION (0.85) — Both are regional commands of the Royal Canadian Legion but different legal entities: Alberta-NWT Command vs Ontario Command Wounded Warriors. Same national parent organization, different provincial commands/programs.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Bursary Fund (0.85) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command charities but serve distinct purposes: A is a bursary/scholarship fund; B is a Wounded Warriors adventure program. Same parent organization, different funds/programs — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Charitable Foundation (0.85) — Both are RCL Ontario Command charities but distinct: A is the Charitable Foundation; B is the Wounded Warriors Adventure program. Same parent command, different legal charitable entities/purposes.
related entity
Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command Poppy Fund (0.85) — Both are Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Command entities but serve distinct purposes: A is the Poppy Fund (fundraising/veterans support via poppies), B is the Wounded Warriors Adventure program. Same parent command, different funds/programs.
recipient · ROYAL CANADIAN SEA CADET CORPS (NAVY LEAGUE)
The dataset shows ROYAL CANADIAN SEA CADET CORPS (NAVY LEAGUE) (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — 360 OKOTOKS ROYAL CANADIAN SEA CADET CORPS.; NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA - BRANTFORD BRANCH; NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA - LETHBRIDGE BRANCH; NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA NL DIVISION; NAVY LEAGUE OF ONTARIO FOUNDATION; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
360 OKOTOKS ROYAL CANADIAN SEA CADET CORPS. (0.82) — Entity A is a specific local Sea Cadet Corps unit in Okotoks (corps #360); Entity B appears to be a broader/national Navy League Sea Cadet Corps body. Same cadet family but different legal organisations — local unit vs. parent/affiliate.
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA - BRANTFORD BRANCH (0.82) — Navy League of Canada Brantford Branch is a local chapter of the Navy League; Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Corps (Navy League) is a distinct cadet corps entity affiliated with the Navy League. Related but different legal organisations.
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA - LETHBRIDGE BRANCH (0.82) — Navy League of Canada Lethbridge Branch (BN 131939175) is a local chapter. Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Corps (Navy League) is a separate CRA qualified donee entity with no BN. Different legal entities but affiliated under Navy League umbrella.
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA NL DIVISION (0.82) — Navy League of Canada NL Division is a regional chapter of the national Navy League; Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Corps (Navy League) is a sponsored cadet corps unit. Related org under same umbrella but distinct legal entities with different BN
related entity
NAVY LEAGUE OF ONTARIO FOUNDATION (0.82) — Navy League of Ontario Foundation (public foundation, BN 888447273) is a funding/foundation body. Royal Canadian Sea Cadet Corps (Navy League) is a qualified donee/cadet corps it likely supports. Different legal entities, different BN roots
The dataset shows SHOPPERS DRUG MART HAMPTON MARKET (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.76) — SHOPPERS DRUG MART 305; SHOPPERS DRUG MART # 331; SHOPPERS DRUG MART 373; SHOPPERS DRUG MART 386; Shoppers Drug Mart Inc; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.762
related entity
SHOPPERS DRUG MART 305 (0.85) — Both are Shoppers Drug Mart franchise locations but appear to be distinct store locations (store #305 vs Hampton Market location). Same parent brand/franchisor but different physical outlets, so RELATED not SAME.
related entity
SHOPPERS DRUG MART # 331 (0.82) — Both are Shoppers Drug Mart franchise locations in Alberta but store #331 and Hampton Market are distinct store locations/franchises, not the same legal entity. Shared brand but different operating units.
related entity
SHOPPERS DRUG MART 373 (0.82) — Both are Shoppers Drug Mart franchise/store locations but appear to be distinct store locations (store #373 vs Hampton Market location). Same brand/parent but different retail outlets, not the same legal entity.
related entity
SHOPPERS DRUG MART 386 (0.82) — Both are Shoppers Drug Mart franchise/store locations under the same parent brand, but '386' and 'Hampton Market' appear to be distinct store locations, not the same legal entity. RELATED as affiliates under Shoppers Drug Mart umbrella.
related entity
Shoppers Drug Mart Inc (0.82) — Entity B is a specific store location (Hampton Market) of the Shoppers Drug Mart chain. No shared BN root. Individual franchise/store locations are subsidiaries or affiliates of the parent brand, not the same legal entity.
The dataset shows SPECIAL OLYMPICS OTTAWA NEPEAN SHARKS (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — Canadian Special Olympics Foundation; GREATER DURHAM SPECIAL OLYMPICS; NEW BRUNSWICK SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC.; NEW BRUNSWICK SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOCIETY INC.; QUEBEC SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC.; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
Canadian Special Olympics Foundation (0.85) — Entity A is the national Special Olympics Canada Foundation (BN 869562041); Entity B is a local Ottawa-Nepean club/chapter with no BN. Same movement but different legal entities — regional chapter vs. national foundation.
related entity
GREATER DURHAM SPECIAL OLYMPICS (0.85) — Both are regional Special Olympics chapters but serve different geographic areas (Durham vs. Ottawa-Nepean), have no shared BN root, and are distinct local affiliates of Special Olympics Canada — RELATED as sibling chapters.
related entity
NEW BRUNSWICK SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC. (0.85) — Both are Special Olympics entities but different organizations: A is the NB provincial body (registered charity with BN), B is a local Ottawa-Nepean club/team chapter. Different regions, different BN roots, regional chapter vs. provincial b
related entity
NEW BRUNSWICK SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOCIETY INC. (0.85) — Both are Special Olympics organizations but different entities: A is the provincial NB society (BN 132657706), B is a local Ottawa-Nepean club chapter. Different geographic scope, no shared BN, regional chapter vs. provincial body.
related entity
QUEBEC SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC. (0.85) — Both are Special Olympics affiliates but distinct legal entities: one is the Quebec provincial organization, the other is a local Ottawa-Nepean club. Different regions, different legal names, no shared BN. Regional chapter vs. provincial bo
The dataset shows SRI SATHYA SAI WORLD FOUNDATION (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF BRAMPTON INC.; SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF MISSISSAUGA-CENTRAL; SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF SASKATOON CORP.; SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF SCARBOROUGH, CANADA; CENTRE SRI SATHYA SAI BABA DE SAINT-HUBERT; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.822
related entity
SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF BRAMPTON INC. (0.85) — Both share 'Sri Sathya Sai' branding but are distinct legal entities: A is a local Brampton chapter with a CRA BN; B is a world foundation with no BN. Local chapter vs. global foundation = RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF MISSISSAUGA-CENTRAL (0.85) — Both share 'Sri Sathya Sai' branding but A is a local Mississauga centre with a registered BN, while B is a world foundation with no BN. Different scope/level suggests affiliate/parent relationship, not same entity.
related entity
SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF SASKATOON CORP. (0.85) — Both are Sri Sathya Sai Baba organizations but one is a local Saskatoon chapter/centre and the other is a world foundation — different scope, no shared BN root. Regional chapter vs. international foundation => RELATED.
related entity
SRI SATHYA SAI BABA CENTRE OF SCARBOROUGH, CANADA (0.85) — Both share 'Sri Sathya Sai' branding but are distinct legal entities: A is a local Scarborough chapter (BN 872084223) and B is a world foundation with no BN. Regional chapter vs. global foundation => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
CENTRE SRI SATHYA SAI BABA DE SAINT-HUBERT (0.82) — Both are Sri Sathya Sai Baba organisations but different legal entities: A is a local Quebec centre (Saint-Hubert) with BN 839841699; B is a world foundation with no BN. Different scope, no shared BN root.
ST. MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EDMONTON 2002 OUTREACH AND BUILDING SOCIETY
high
recipient · ST. MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EDMONTON 2002 OUTREACH AND BUILDING SOCIETY
The dataset shows ST. MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EDMONTON 2002 OUTREACH AND BUILDING SOCIETY (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.77) — CHURCH OF ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS; ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS ANGLICAN CHURCH; ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS ANGLICAN CHURCH; ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH; ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.772
related entity
CHURCH OF ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS (0.82) — Entity B is a separate legal body (outreach/building society founded 2002, no BN) affiliated with the same Edmonton Anglican church (Entity A, BN 106925449). Different legal structures and purposes; parent church vs. affiliated society.
related entity
ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS ANGLICAN CHURCH (0.82) — Entity B is a separate legal society ('Outreach and Building Society', founded 2002) associated with St. Michael & All Angels Anglican Church Edmonton, not the church itself. Different BN roots, different legal form — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS ANGLICAN CHURCH (0.82) — Entity B is a separate legal society ('Outreach and Building Society', 2002) affiliated with St. Michael & All Angels Anglican Church Edmonton, not the church itself. Different BN roots, different legal form. Parent/affiliate relationship,
related entity
ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH (0.82) — Entity B is a distinct legal society (outreach/building society, AB non-profit, no BN) affiliated with St. Michael & All Angels Church Edmonton, not the same legal org. Name overlap is high but purpose and legal structure differ — parent/af
related entity
ST. MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH (0.82) — Entity B is a distinct legal entity (outreach/building society founded 2002, no BN) affiliated with St. Michael & All Angels Church Edmonton, not the same legal org. Name overlap is high but purpose and legal form differ — prefer RELATED.
The dataset shows THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — Evangelical Free Church of Erskine, Alberta; EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA; EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA, PACIFIC DISTRICT; EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA - PRAIRIE DISTRICT; EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CARBERRY; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.828
related entity
Evangelical Free Church of Erskine, Alberta (0.88) — Entity A is a local congregation (Erskine, Alberta) with a CRA BN; Entity B is the national Canadian denomination body. Different legal entities: regional chapter vs. national parent organisation.
related entity
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA (0.85) — AMERICA vs CANADA in name indicates distinct national organizations. Evangelical Free Church of America and Evangelical Free Church of Canada are separate legal entities in different countries, though affiliated movements. Different BN root
related entity
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA, PACIFIC DISTRICT (0.85) — Entity A is the Pacific District chapter of the Evangelical Free Church of Canada (BN 890265530), a registered CRA charity. Entity B appears to be the national organisation. Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA - PRAIRIE DISTRICT (0.85) — Entity A is the Prairie District regional chapter of the national body (Entity B). Different BN roots (A has 107354169, B has none but is the parent org). Regional chapter vs. national organization => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CARBERRY (0.85) — Entity A is a local church (Carberry, MB) with a CRA BN; Entity B is the national Canadian denomination body. Same theological movement but regional chapter vs. national organization => RELATED, not SAME.
The dataset shows TIM HORTONS 1666330 ALBERTA LTD. (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.72) — TIM HORTONS #3393; TIM HORTONS; TIM HORTONS 3548; TIM HORTONS #640; TIM HORTONS 4131; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 3 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.718
related entity
TIM HORTONS #3393 (0.85) — Both are Tim Hortons franchise entities in Alberta but distinct legal identities: A is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd), B is a specific franchise location (#3393). Likely same franchisee or related operator, but not provabl
related entity
TIM HORTONS (0.82) — Entity B is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd.) operating as a Tim Hortons franchise, not the Tim Hortons parent brand (BN 762699726). Franchise vs. brand/parent => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
TIM HORTONS 3548 (0.75) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta corporation operating a Tim Hortons franchise; Entity B appears to be a specific Tim Hortons store location (store #3548). Likely same franchise owner or related, but no BN to confirm identity. Prefer RELATED
related entity
TIM HORTONS #640 (0.75) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd) operating a Tim Hortons franchise; Entity B is Tim Hortons #640, a specific store location. Likely same franchise operator but no proof they are identical legal entities; prefer R
related entity
TIM HORTONS 4131 (0.72) — Entity A is a numbered Alberta company (1666330 Alberta Ltd) operating a Tim Hortons franchise; Entity B appears to be a specific Tim Hortons store location (store #4131). Likely related franchises but not provably the same legal entity wit
recipient · TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS
The dataset shows TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN WELLNESS CONNECTIONS (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.80) — TOWN OF CARMAN - BOYNE RIVER KEEPERS; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL; TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN FARMERS MARKET; TOWN OF CARMAN - BACK ON CUE; TOWN OF CARMAN-CARMAN COMMUNITY GARDEN; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.798
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - BOYNE RIVER KEEPERS (0.85) — Both are distinct programs/initiatives under the Town of Carman umbrella (CRA qualified donees), but 'Carman Wellness Connections' and 'Boyne River Keepers' are different organizations/programs with different mandates. RELATED as municipal
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN COMMUNITY HALL (0.85) — Both are separate municipal programs/facilities under the Town of Carman listed as CRA qualified donees, but they are distinct entities (Community Hall vs. Wellness Connections) with different purposes, not the same legal organisation.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - CARMAN FARMERS MARKET (0.85) — Both are distinct programs/initiatives under the Town of Carman as CRA qualified donees, but 'Carman Farmers Market' and 'Carman Wellness Connections' are different organizations/programs sharing the same municipal parent.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN - BACK ON CUE (0.82) — Both are programs/initiatives of the Town of Carman listed as CRA qualified donees, but 'Carman Wellness Connections' and 'Back on Cue' are distinct programs under the same municipal umbrella — related but not the same legal entity.
related entity
TOWN OF CARMAN-CARMAN COMMUNITY GARDEN (0.82) — Both are Town of Carman municipal sub-entities listed as CRA qualified donees, but represent distinct programs: Carman Wellness Connections vs Carman Community Garden. Same municipal parent, different legal/program identities.
recipient · TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - STYLE AT HOME
The dataset shows TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - STYLE AT HOME (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - THE HOCKEY NEWS; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE HANTS JOURNAL; Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 10 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Media G.P. but represent distinct magazine brands (Canadian Gardening vs. Style at Home). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are divisions/imprints of Transcontinental Media G.P. — same parent legal entity but operating under different magazine brand names (Canadian Living vs. Style at Home). Parent/division relationship => RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - THE HOCKEY NEWS (0.85) — Both are divisions/imprints of Transcontinental Media G.P. but represent distinct publications (Style at Home vs. The Hockey News). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE HANTS JOURNAL (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Transcontinental media umbrella: Entity A is Transcontinental Media G.P. publishing Style at Home magazine; Entity B is Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. publishing The Hants Journal. D
related entity
Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Transcontinental media umbrella: A is 'Transcontinental Media G.P.' (a general partnership publishing Style at Home), B is 'Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc.' (a separate incorporated e
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE ANNAPOLIS COUNTY SPECTATOR
high
recipient · TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE ANNAPOLIS COUNTY SPECTATOR
The dataset shows TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE ANNAPOLIS COUNTY SPECTATOR (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post; TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE AURORA; TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE COMPASS; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN GARDENING; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 7 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.851
related entity
Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post (0.92) — Both are divisions/publications of the same legal entity Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc., but represent different newspaper titles (Sackville Tribune Post vs. Annapolis County Spectator). Same parent company, different operati
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE AURORA (0.85) — Both are distinct Transcontinental Media subsidiaries operating different regional newspapers (The Aurora vs. The Annapolis County Spectator) under different legal entities (Atlantic Media Group G.P. vs. Nova Scotia Media Group Inc.). Same
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE COMPASS (0.85) — Both are Transcontinental media subsidiaries operating distinct Atlantic publications (The Compass vs. The Annapolis County Spectator) under different legal entities (G.P. vs. Inc.), different provinces/regions. Same parent group, different
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN GARDENING (0.85) — Both are Transcontinental media subsidiaries/divisions but different legal entities: 'Transcontinental Media G.P.' vs 'Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc.' — different legal names, different publications, likely different BN roots
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Transcontinental media umbrella: A is Transcontinental Media G.P. publishing Canadian Living; B is Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. publishing a regional paper. Different legal entitie
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE KINGS COUNTY ADVERTISER
high
recipient · TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE KINGS COUNTY ADVERTISER
The dataset shows TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE KINGS COUNTY ADVERTISER (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DIGBY COUNTY COURIER; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE YARMOUTH COUNTY VANGUARD; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE CITIZEN-RECORD; TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE COMPASS; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 7 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.863
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DIGBY COUNTY COURIER (0.92) — Both are distinct publication divisions of Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc., but represent different newspaper titles (Digby County Courier vs Kings County Advertiser). Same parent company, different operating units/publication
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE YARMOUTH COUNTY VANGUARD (0.92) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc., but represent distinct newspaper titles (Kings County Advertiser vs Yarmouth County Vanguard). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED n
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE CITIZEN-RECORD (0.88) — Both share the same legal parent 'Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc.' but represent distinct newspaper publications (The Citizen-Record vs. The Kings County Advertiser). Same corporate parent, different operating units — RELATED
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE COMPASS (0.85) — Both are Transcontinental media subsidiaries operating distinct local publications (The Compass vs. Kings County Advertiser) under different legal entities (G.P. vs. Inc.) in different provinces (Atlantic vs. Nova Scotia). Same corporate fa
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Transcontinental media umbrella: one is Transcontinental Media G.P. (Canadian Living magazine), the other is Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. (Kings County Advertiser). Different legal
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE SHELBURNE COUNTY COAST GUARD
high
recipient · TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE SHELBURNE COUNTY COAST GUARD
The dataset shows TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE SHELBURNE COUNTY COAST GUARD (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE AMHERST NEWS; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE ANNAPOLIS COUNTY SPECTATOR; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE CITIZEN-RECORD; TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DIGBY COUNTY COURIER; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 6 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.848
related entity
Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. - The Sackville Tribune Post (0.88) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. but represent different newspapers (Sackville Tribune Post vs. Shelburne County Coast Guard), making them related operating units of the same parent, not the s
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE AMHERST NEWS (0.85) — Both share the same legal parent 'TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC.' but represent different newspaper divisions/publications (The Amherst News vs. The Shelburne County Coast Guard). Same parent company, different operating unit
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE ANNAPOLIS COUNTY SPECTATOR (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. but represent different newspaper brands (Annapolis County Spectator vs Shelburne County Coast Guard). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RE
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE CITIZEN-RECORD (0.85) — Both share the same legal entity 'Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc.' but represent distinct newspaper publication divisions/titles (The Citizen-Record vs. The Shelburne County Coast Guard). Same parent company, different operati
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL NOVA SCOTIA MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DIGBY COUNTY COURIER (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Nova Scotia Media Group Inc. but represent different newspapers (Digby County Courier vs. Shelburne County Coast Guard). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not S
TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE GRENFELL SUN
high
recipient · TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE GRENFELL SUN
The dataset shows TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE GRENFELL SUN (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.84) — TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE PILOT; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING; TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - THE HOCKEY NEWS; TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE BROADVIEW EXPRESS; TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DEEP SOUTH STAR; it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.838
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL ATLANTIC MEDIA GROUP G.P. - THE PILOT (0.85) — Both are distinct Transcontinental Media regional subsidiaries operating different newspapers in different provinces (Atlantic vs Saskatchewan). Same parent company but different legal entities with different provincial incorporations and p
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - CANADIAN LIVING (0.85) — Both are distinct legal entities under the Transcontinental media umbrella: Entity A is Transcontinental Media G.P. publishing Canadian Living; Entity B is Transcontinental Saskatchewan Media Group Inc. publishing The Grenfell Sun. Differen
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL MEDIA G.P. - THE HOCKEY NEWS (0.85) — Both are distinct Transcontinental Inc. subsidiaries/divisions operating different publications (The Hockey News vs. The Grenfell Sun) under different legal entities (Transcontinental Media G.P. vs. Transcontinental Saskatchewan Media Group
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE BROADVIEW EXPRESS (0.85) — Both are divisions of Transcontinental Saskatchewan Media Group Inc. but represent distinct newspaper publications (Broadview Express vs Grenfell Sun). Same parent legal entity, different operating units — RELATED not SAME.
related entity
TRANSCONTINENTAL SASKATCHEWAN MEDIA GROUP INC. - THE DEEP SOUTH STAR (0.85) — Both are divisions/publications of Transcontinental Saskatchewan Media Group Inc., but 'The Deep South Star' and 'The Grenfell Sun' are distinct newspaper titles/trade names, making them related units under the same parent rather than the s
recipient · TSUU T'INA BUILDING MAINTENANCE CORPORATION LTD.
The dataset shows TSUU T'INA BUILDING MAINTENANCE CORPORATION LTD. (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.82) — TSUU T'INA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; TSUU T'INA HOLDINGS CORPORATION LTD.; TSUU T'INA CATTLE COMPANY; TSUU T'INA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; TSUU T'INA ENERGY CORPORATION; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.819
related entity
TSUU T'INA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION (0.85) — Both are Tsuu T'ina Nation-affiliated corporations but serve different purposes: entertainment vs. building maintenance. Same community/nation affiliation but distinct legal entities with different names and functions.
related entity
TSUU T'INA HOLDINGS CORPORATION LTD. (0.85) — Both are Tsuu T'ina Nation corporate entities but serve distinct functions: Holdings Corp (investment/holding) vs Building Maintenance Corp (services). Same community origin but different legal entities with different mandates — parent/affi
related entity
TSUU T'INA CATTLE COMPANY (0.82) — Both are Tsuu T'ina Nation-affiliated entities but serve distinct purposes: cattle company vs. building maintenance corporation. Same community/nation affiliation but different legal organizations and business functions.
related entity
TSUU T'INA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (0.82) — Both are Tsuu T'ina Nation-affiliated corporations but serve distinct functions: construction vs. building maintenance. Same community origin, likely affiliated entities, but different legal organisations with different mandates.
related entity
TSUU T'INA ENERGY CORPORATION (0.82) — Both share 'Tsuu T'ina' prefix suggesting affiliation with Tsuu T'ina Nation, but one is an energy corporation and the other a building maintenance corporation — distinct legal entities, likely affiliated under the same First Nation.
The dataset shows WETASKIWIN CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (non_profit) adjudicated as RELATED to 13 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.83) — CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - CANADA WEST DISTRICT; Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene; Church of the Nazarene Canada; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE CANADA WEST DISTRICT; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - NATIONAL; it appears in 1 dataset (ab) with 1 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
0.59 · moderate
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
13
avg related confidence
0.828
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - CANADA WEST DISTRICT (0.88) — Entity A is the Canada West District (regional body, CRA charity BN 372804406). Entity B is a local congregation in Wetaskiwin, AB — a member church under that district. Same denomination, but different legal entities: regional vs. local.
related entity
Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene (0.85) — Canada Central District Church of the Nazarene is the regional district body; Wetaskiwin Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation in Wetaskiwin AB under that district. Different legal entities, parent/affiliate relationship.
related entity
Church of the Nazarene Canada (0.85) — Wetaskiwin Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation affiliated with Church of the Nazarene Canada (national body). Different legal entities: B has no BN, is city-specific, non_profit vs charity. Regional chapter vs national => RELATED
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE CANADA WEST DISTRICT (0.85) — Entity A is the Canada West District organization of the Church of the Nazarene (BN 106926652, CRA charity). Entity B is a local Wetaskiwin congregation. Same denomination, different legal entities: district vs. local church.
related entity
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE - NATIONAL (0.85) — Wetaskiwin Church of the Nazarene is a local congregation in Wetaskiwin, AB; Entity A is the national body. Same denomination but regional chapter vs. national organization => RELATED, not SAME.
ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE (AFÉAS)
high
recipient · 106731771
The dataset shows ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE (AFÉAS) (organization) adjudicated as RELATED to 12 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.85) — ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D’ÉDUCATION ET D’ACTION SOCIALE DE BÉGIN; ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D’ÉDUCATION ET D’ACTION SOCIALE DE SAINT-HONORÉ; ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE RÉGION DE SAGUENAY LAC SAINT-JEAN; AFÉAS ST-JACQUES, ASSOCIATION FÉMINISTE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE; ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE (AFEAS DE DUDSWELL); it appears in 1 dataset (fed) with 2 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
1.00 · strong
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
12
avg related confidence
0.851
related entity
ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D’ÉDUCATION ET D’ACTION SOCIALE DE BÉGIN (0.92) — Different BN roots (106731771 vs 900060492) confirm distinct legal entities. Entity B is a local chapter ('de Bégin') of the national AFÉAS organization (Entity A). Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED.
related entity
ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D’ÉDUCATION ET D’ACTION SOCIALE DE SAINT-HONORÉ (0.92) — Different BN roots (106731771 vs 900062548) confirm distinct legal entities. Entity B is a local chapter (Saint-Honoré) of the national AFÉAS organization (Entity A). Regional chapter vs. national body => RELATED.
related entity
ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE RÉGION DE SAGUENAY LAC SAINT-JEAN (0.92) — Different BN roots (106731771 vs 900067679) confirm distinct legal entities. B is a regional chapter (Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean) of the national AFÉAS organisation (A). Classic national/regional affiliate relationship.
related entity
AFÉAS ST-JACQUES, ASSOCIATION FÉMINISTE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE (0.88) — Different BN roots (106731771 vs 900098724). Entity A is the national AFÉAS organization; Entity B is a local chapter (St-Jacques). Same movement/brand but distinct legal entities — national vs. local chapter = RELATED.
related entity
ASSOCIATION FÉMININE D'ÉDUCATION ET D'ACTION SOCIALE (AFEAS DE DUDSWELL) (0.88) — Different BN roots (106731771 vs 900078619) confirm distinct legal entities. Entity B is a local chapter (Dudswell) of the national AFÉAS organization represented by Entity A. Parent/chapter relationship => RELATED.
The dataset shows BELLEVILLE WESLEYAN CHURCH (charitable_org) adjudicated as RELATED to 12 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.86) — Central Canada District of the Wesleyan Church in Canada; THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA; THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA/L'EGLISE WESLEYENNE DU CANADA; ATLANTIC DISTRICT OF THE WESLEYAN CHURCH; Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church; it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 6 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
1.00 · strong
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
12
avg related confidence
0.864
related entity
Central Canada District of the Wesleyan Church in Canada (0.92) — Different BN roots (106783087 vs 108013987). Belleville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; Central Canada District of the Wesleyan Church is its regional denominational body. Parent/affiliate relationship, not same legal entity.
related entity
THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA (0.92) — Different BN roots (106783087 vs 896256168). Belleville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; The Wesleyan Church of Canada is the national denominational body. Parent/affiliate relationship, not the same legal entity.
related entity
THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA/L'EGLISE WESLEYENNE DU CANADA (0.92) — Different BN roots (106783087 vs 892556168). Belleville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; The Wesleyan Church of Canada is the national denominational body. These are related (member church vs. national church organization), not the
related entity
ATLANTIC DISTRICT OF THE WESLEYAN CHURCH (0.88) — Different BN roots (106783087 vs 106736342) confirm distinct legal entities. Belleville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; Atlantic District of the Wesleyan Church is a regional denominational body — parent/affiliate relationship with
related entity
Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church (0.88) — Different BN roots (106783087 vs 108103987). Belleville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church is the regional district body. Same denomination, parent/affiliate relationship, not the same le
The dataset shows BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - TORONTO (charitable_org) adjudicated as RELATED to 12 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.96) — BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO DURHAM REGION; BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - HAMILTON/BURLINGTON; BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - KINGSTON REGION; BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO-KINGSTON REGION; BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - MIDWESTERN REGION; it appears in 2 datasets (cra, fed) with 47 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
1.00 · strong
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
12
avg related confidence
0.957
related entity
BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO DURHAM REGION (0.97) — Different BN roots (106785397 vs 861619880) confirm distinct legal entities. Both are regional chapters of Bereaved Families of Ontario — Toronto vs Durham Region — making them affiliated but separate organisations.
related entity
BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - HAMILTON/BURLINGTON (0.97) — Both are regional chapters of Bereaved Families of Ontario but have different BN 9-digit roots (106785397 vs 865892319) and serve different cities (Toronto vs Hamilton/Burlington), making them distinct legal entities under a shared provinci
related entity
BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - KINGSTON REGION (0.97) — Both share the 'Bereaved Families of Ontario' brand but have different BN roots (106785397 vs 865432730) and serve different regions (Toronto vs Kingston). These are distinct regional chapters — RELATED, not SAME.
related entity
BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO-KINGSTON REGION (0.97) — Both are regional chapters of Bereaved Families of Ontario but have different 9-digit BN roots (106785397 vs 865211718) and serve different cities (Toronto vs Kingston). They are affiliates under the same provincial network, not the same le
related entity
BEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO - MIDWESTERN REGION (0.97) — Different BN roots (106785397 vs 871593117) confirm distinct legal entities. Both are regional chapters of Bereaved Families of Ontario — Toronto vs Midwestern Region — making them RELATED affiliates, not the same org.
The dataset shows Brockville Wesleyan Church (charity) adjudicated as RELATED to 12 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.89) — THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA; ATLANTIC DISTRICT OF THE WESLEYAN CHURCH; Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church; Central Canada District of the Wesleyan Church in Canada; The Wesleyan Church of Canada (Central Canada District); it appears in 1 dataset (cra) with 12 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
1.00 · strong
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
12
avg related confidence
0.887
related entity
THE WESLEYAN CHURCH OF CANADA (0.95) — Different BN roots (106813264 vs 896256168). Brockville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; The Wesleyan Church of Canada is the national denominational body. Classic regional chapter vs. national parent relationship.
related entity
ATLANTIC DISTRICT OF THE WESLEYAN CHURCH (0.92) — Different BN roots (106813264 vs 106736342): Brockville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; Atlantic District of the Wesleyan Church is a regional denominational body. Same denomination but distinct legal entities — parent/affiliate re
related entity
Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church (0.92) — Different BN roots (106813264 vs 108103987): Brockville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; Central Canada District of The Wesleyan Church is the regional denominational body. Related as member church vs. district organization.
related entity
Central Canada District of the Wesleyan Church in Canada (0.92) — Different BN roots (106813264 vs 108013987): A is a local Wesleyan congregation in Brockville; B is the regional district body overseeing Wesleyan churches in Central Canada. Parent/affiliate relationship, not the same legal entity.
related entity
The Wesleyan Church of Canada (Central Canada District) (0.92) — Different BN roots (106813264 vs 108100001). Brockville Wesleyan Church is a local congregation; The Wesleyan Church of Canada (Central Canada District) is its regional denominational body. Related but distinct legal entities.
The dataset shows CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA (charitable_org) adjudicated as RELATED to 12 other entities by the entity-resolution pipeline (mean verdict confidence 0.91) — CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF MANITOBA INC; Child Evangelism Fellowship of Ontario; Child Evangelism Fellowship of Saskatchewan, Inc.; CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP ATLANTIC INC.; CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF ALBERTA; it appears in 2 datasets (cra, fed) with 50 source records. Glassbox surfaces the network; the funder verifies governance overlap.
Evidence strength
1.00 · strong
11 cited fields from source records
Show observations (11 cited fields)Hide observations
related count
12
avg related confidence
0.909
related entity
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF MANITOBA INC (0.97) — Different BN roots (106913502 vs 118851849): A is the national Canadian charity, B is the Manitoba provincial chapter/affiliate. Same movement, distinct legal entities. Regional chapter vs. national => RELATED.
related entity
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Ontario (0.97) — Different BN roots (106913502 vs 106913544): A is the national Canadian organization, B is the Ontario provincial chapter. Same movement/brand but distinct legal entities. Per rules: regional chapter vs. national => RELATED.
related entity
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Saskatchewan, Inc. (0.97) — Different BN roots (106913502 vs 106913536): national org vs Saskatchewan provincial chapter. Same CEF brand/movement but distinct legal entities. Per rules: regional chapter vs. national => RELATED.
related entity
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP ATLANTIC INC. (0.95) — Different BN roots (106913502 vs 106913486) confirm distinct legal entities. Entity B is a regional Atlantic chapter of the national Child Evangelism Fellowship of Canada (Entity A). Same brand/mission but separate registrations => RELATED.
related entity
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF ALBERTA (0.95) — Different BN roots (106913502 vs 118851823) confirm two distinct legal entities. Entity A is the national Canadian organization; Entity B is the Alberta provincial chapter/affiliate. Classic national-regional relationship => RELATED.
The Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Canada - Newfoundland and Labrador Inc. (0.88) — Both are provincial chapters of the Duke of Edinburgh's Award program but serve different provinces (Newfoundland & Labrador vs. Nova Scotia). No shared BN root. Same program family but distinct legal entities.
dataset sources
fed
source link count
1
entity type
organization
confidence
0.7
related entity
Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada District Office (0.85) — Entity A is the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada District Office (national/district body, CRA charity). Entity B is a local Fort McMurray congregation affiliated with PAOC. Same denomination but different legal entities: parent/affiliate vs
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Learning Disabilities Association of Manitoba (0.95) — Entity A is the Manitoba provincial association (CRA charity BN 119010452); Entity B is the Calgary Chapter of the Alberta provincial association. Different provinces, different legal entities, no shared BN. Regional chapter vs. different p
dataset sources
ab,fed
source link count
5
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
LOCAL #120 (ANZAC METIS LOCAL) OF THE METIS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (0.92) — Both are distinct local chapters of the Metis Association of Alberta — Local #120 (Anzac) vs Local 1001 (Calgary). Same parent organization but different numbered locals in different locations; regional chapters, not the same legal entity.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
Metis Nation of Alberta Otipemisiwak Metis Government (0.88) — Entity A is the Metis Nation of Alberta's central governing body (Otipemisiwak Metis Government). Entity B is a local chapter (Local 394), a sub-unit/affiliate. Same parent org, but legally distinct regional chapter vs. national body.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but serve different geographic districts (Jasper House vs. Calgary Elbow). Same parent org, different regional chapters => RELATED.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JASPER HOUSE METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Jasper House vs. Foothills). Same parent organization, different regional chapters => RELATED.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT EDMONTON METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella, but represent different geographic districts (Fort Edmonton vs. Jasper House). Same parent org, different legal chapter entities => RELATED.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct district councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts (Medicine Hat vs Fort McMurray). Same parent org, different local chapters => RELATED.
dataset sources
ab
source link count
1
entity type
non_profit
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MEDICINE HAT METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are district councils under the Otipemisiwak Métis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts: St. Albert (District 11) vs. Medicine Hat. Different local entities under the same parent organization.
dataset sources
ab,fed
source link count
3
entity type
government
confidence
0.7
related entity
OTIPEMISIWAK METIS GOVERNMENT - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF FORT MCMURRAY METIS DISTRICT (0.95) — Both are distinct District Councils under the Otipemisiwak Metis Government umbrella but represent different geographic districts (St. Paul-Cold Lake vs. Fort McMurray), making them separate legal entities that are affiliated under the same
