Running pattern detector against the corpus
The dataset shows recipients receiving funding from both the federal grants & contributions stream and Alberta provincial grants — entities sitting at the intersection of two funder pools where program duplication is a real risk that funders can verify against.
Glassbox surfaces correlations and observations, not findings of misconduct. Severity is a calibrated read on how strongly the dataset matches the pattern definition — a starting point for review, not a verdict.
The match meets the pattern threshold but the signal is the lower band. Normal review queue.
The match exceeds the routine threshold. Worth a closer look — pull the source rows, walk the citation.
The match is in the highest band of the calibrated scale. Recommend: prioritise for active review.
Severity is computed from the detection signal · general.entity_golden_records with both 'fed' and 'ab' in dataset_sources · ≥ 5 federal and ≥ 5 Alberta source records · combined record count ≥ p90 within the entity's entity_type · confidence ≥ 0.7 · signal = combined record count
The dataset shows TOWN OF RIMBEY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 17 federal grant/contribution records and 144 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
Aggregated from the matches below. Severity bands are calibrated per pattern; counts and dollar totals reflect this snapshot only.
The dataset shows Gordon Food Service Canada Ltd (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 16 federal grant/contribution records and 145 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows Edmonton Mennonite Centre for Newcomers (non_profit) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 151 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for non_profit of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows TOWN OF CARDSTON|MUNICIPALITÉ DE CARDSTON (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 20 federal grant/contribution records and 140 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF TREATY SIX CONFEDERACY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 118 federal grant/contribution records and 42 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows Community Futures Treaty Seven (non_profit) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 43 federal grant/contribution records and 116 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for non_profit of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows BEAVER COUNTY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 6 federal grant/contribution records and 150 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows BIRCH HILLS COUNTY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 5 federal grant/contribution records and 147 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF WEMBLEY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 11 federal grant/contribution records and 136 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows CROWSNEST PASS SENIOR HOUSING (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 5 federal grant/contribution records and 142 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF LEGAL (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 18 federal grant/contribution records and 128 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF ELK POINT (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 13 federal grant/contribution records and 133 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows WINDERMERE EARLY LEARNING CENTRE INC (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 7 federal grant/contribution records and 139 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF BENTLEY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 11 federal grant/contribution records and 134 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows NUNEE HEALTH BOARD SOCIETY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 111 federal grant/contribution records and 34 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows VILLAGE OF BEISEKER (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 132 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF REDWATER (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 12 federal grant/contribution records and 129 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF ONOWAY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 16 federal grant/contribution records and 124 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows KLUB BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL CARE INCORPORATED (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 5 federal grant/contribution records and 132 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TUSCANY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 16 federal grant/contribution records and 121 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows West Fraser Mills Ltd (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 8 federal grant/contribution records and 129 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows BIG GUNS ENERGY SERVICES INC. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 6 federal grant/contribution records and 130 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows BOW VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT SERVICES COMMISSION (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 9 federal grant/contribution records and 126 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows ACE TENNIS ACADEMY INC. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 9 federal grant/contribution records and 124 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows AECOM Canada Ltd (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 46 federal grant/contribution records and 85 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows EARTHMASTER ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES INC. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 14 federal grant/contribution records and 113 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows THE MEADOWS EARLY LEARNING AND CHILD CARE LTD. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 5 federal grant/contribution records and 121 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows Klorious Services Inc. (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 7 federal grant/contribution records and 117 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows EQUS REA LTD. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 12 federal grant/contribution records and 112 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows VILLAGE OF WASKATENAU (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 11 federal grant/contribution records and 112 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows YELLOWHEAD TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 6 federal grant/contribution records and 113 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows VILLAGE OF BIG VALLEY (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 107 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows VILLAGE OF STANDARD (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 105 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 6 federal grant/contribution records and 109 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows FBA EDUCATION SERVICES LTD. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 104 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows IBM Canada Limited (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 7 federal grant/contribution records and 104 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows The Terry Fox Foundation (public_foundation) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 106 federal grant/contribution records and 5 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for public_foundation of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows VOLLEYBALL ALBERTA ASSOCIATION (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 9 federal grant/contribution records and 97 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF IRRICANA (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 7 federal grant/contribution records and 99 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows TOWN OF ATHABASCA (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 14 federal grant/contribution records and 90 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows SUMMER VILLAGE OF ISLAND LAKE (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 91 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows BOOK PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 34 federal grant/contribution records and 64 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows PIIKANI CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 59 federal grant/contribution records and 39 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows BALLAD CONSULTING GROUP INC. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 5 federal grant/contribution records and 92 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows MEDLIOR HEALTH OUTCOMES RESEARCH LTD. (organization) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 76 federal grant/contribution records and 21 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for organization of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows L & J Day Care Centre Ltd o/a B-Smart Learning Center Inc. (company) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 11 federal grant/contribution records and 81 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for company of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows Muhammad Khan (individual) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 7 federal grant/contribution records and 73 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for individual of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows Alicia Anderson (individual) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 10 federal grant/contribution records and 27 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for individual of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).
The dataset shows Matthew Johnson (individual) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 19 federal grant/contribution records and 17 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for individual of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · Receiving both federal and Alberta funding is common for universities, health authorities, municipalities and large NGOs whose programs are distinct by design; overlap is a verification prompt, not evidence of duplication.
The dataset shows Wang, Xin (individual) appears in both federal and Alberta provincial funding streams — 17 federal grant/contribution records and 18 Alberta provincial records, above the 90th percentile for individual of its type. Glassbox surfaces the overlap; the funder verifies whether programs are distinct or duplicative.
Why this may be benign · The recipient business number is missing or a placeholder ('0', all-zeros, '-', 'n/a'): rows were grouped by legal name only, so distinct entities with the same name may be merged (KNOWN-DATA-ISSUES F-6/F-7).